2013-07-26 02:27 AM
I need some advice on snapmanager for sharepoint and the latest version 7.11, and on the RBS setup. For the RBS you can setup a storage location on the filers where you want to store the documents which is the RBS. I can setup a new volume for each RBS per web applicatiom or site in sharepoint, and then setup a CIFS share on it.
I wanted to ask for a rbs storage location, is it best to setup a volume or a qtree, any advantages of having either.
2013-07-30 10:29 PM
The best practice is to keep BLOB shares separate for each farm / SQL server instance. The Stub database for the farm will maintain reference pointers to externalize-retrieve BLOB content from NetApp CIFS shares. There is no real need for qtree to get RBS working correctly. But if you go with qtrees, keep a 1:1 ratio between volumes and qtrees.
If SnapVault integration is planned, the LUN should always be placed in a qtree.
Also place the SMSP index on a separate LUN/ CIFS share from that of the RBS data.
2013-07-31 02:05 AM
Thanks for the reply.
I was planning on setting a volume for RBS per a site collection as each site collection has its own content database. But from your previous post you are saying you can create a volume for RBS per a sharepoint farm no matter how many content databases there are.
Also we do want to use snapvault integration eventually in the future, so do we need to setup a LUN for the RBS location, as I read somewhere you can only setup the volume or qtree as a cifs share for RBS only.
2013-08-01 03:45 AM
The general guideline is to choose create a volume for RBS per a sharepoint farm. Although you choose to setup a volume for RBS per site collection as well.
You're right, setup a qtree for RBS in order to leverage the Netapp SnapVault feature later.
2013-08-01 04:15 AM
Thanks for the reply back Cheryl.
I am going to setup a volume, qtree and then enable cifs for this qtree and enable this for RBS for the whole sharepoint farm. I guess we cant use luns for RBS,
Also i want to utlilize the sync data to associated physical devices as part of the logical device setup, is there any impact on using this feature. I want to create 2 physical devices on under 2 different filers, so that data from rbs gets synced between 2 filers. Is this a recommended setup, is there any performance impact, should it be best if the physical devices are on the same filer.