Reallocate or not?

ONTAP 7.3.2


I've just added 10 additonal disks into an exisitng aggregate. The aggregate contains NFS datastores which in turn contain live VMDK files. The NetApp volumes containing the NFS datstores are deduplicated.

Do I reallocate or not? If yes, which command do I use?


Re: Reallocate or not?

You may want to. How many data disks did you have before the addition ?

What is the resulting RAID layout ?

You cna run 'reallocate measure' on a volume or two on the aggregate - look for a 'hot spots' index number.

See the man page for reallocate:

I hope this response has been helpful to you.

At your service,

Eugene E. Kashpureff
Senior Systems Architect / NetApp Certified Instructor

(P.S. I appreciate points for helpful or correct answers.)

Re: Reallocate or not?

We often have customers run a perfstat, or we run statit separately (perfstat contains statit) and statit will show disk utilization percentage.  If mostly writes, you will see the new disks have heavier utilization but see how much.... if 50% or less it usually isn't an issue.

measure_layout is also a good method like Eugene mentioned, but statit may give what you need much quicker, or you can run both.  For stati,  "priv set advanced ; statit -b"  wait a while for a representative sample of the counters then "priv set advanced ; statit -enr" and you will see util% on all disks.  Check the disks in your aggregate and see the range of % between disks.  For example if you see 10 disks at 95% and the rest at 20% it might make sense to reallocate....but if you see those 10 disks at 40% and the other disks at 20% it wouldn't.

Re: Reallocate or not?

Could you explain what hotpspot (in reallocate output) actually means and how to intepret it? I do not remember any paper describing it.

Re: Reallocate or not?

Thanks for the replies gents.

Disks in aggergate: 40

RAID groups: 2 x 20 disks (18 data + 2 parity)

Scott, good point about the statit command. I've checked util% and its running at 5% for the original disks and 1% for the new disks I've added.

I've seen the reallocate man pages, however I raised the question because of some other posts that I've seen. One guy says don't reallocate on a volume which contains live virtual machines. Is there any truth in that comment?

Just for clarity, the measure_layout increments range between 1 (optimised) to 10 (very unpotimised)? I get '2' for all volumes in the aggregate.


Re: Reallocate or not?

Have you seen this thread already?

One guy says don't reallocate on a volume which contains live virtual machines. Is there any truth in that comment?

To me it does make sense to be cautious - reallocate process will consume some resources, so scheduling it off peak is recommended.



Re: Reallocate or not?

Very good.  At 5% it wouldn't be worth changing anything.  Put more VMs on that aggregate

Re: Reallocate or not?

I realize this thread is older, but just FYI:  The NetApp recommendation is to never run reallocate on deduplicated volumes.  The deduplication process itself eliminates the benefits of reallocation and vice versa.

Re: Reallocate or not?

Do you have reference to (document with) this recommendation?

Re: Reallocate or not?

TR-3505 page 21 under the heading 4.4 deduplication and read reallcoation:


A read reallocation scan does not rearrange blocks on disk that are shared between files by deduplication
on deduplicated volumes. Since read reallocation does not predictably improve the file layout and the
sequential read performance when used on deduplicated volumes, performing read reallocation on
deduplicated volumes is not supported. Instead, for files to benefit from read reallocation, they should be
stored on volumes that are not enabled for deduplication"