Hyper-V using SOFS vs NetApp SMB 3.0

I have a customer asking about what the pros and cons would be to run Hyper-V using Windows Scale Out File Server instead of using NetApp SMB 3.0. MS is pushing hard telling the customer that there is no benifit to using NetApp or SAN when commidity hardware will suffice with SOFS. I checked the fieldportal can't find any type of matrix or battlecard comparing these options.