Subscribe

VASA Provider built-in on controller vs. VM

Hi NetApp,

 

I see some other vendors have the VASA provider built-in on their controllers.

I like that approach as this becomes more and more critical. It would be easier / faster to deploy and I'm sure it would be more reliable.

 

What are your thoughts?

Re: VASA Provider built-in on controller vs. VM

Hello @thomasb82,

 

While the ONTAP VASA Provider is an appliance, SolidFire's implementation is a part of the cluster.  Both models have their advantages and disadvantages, unfortunately I don't know the engineering or product management decision process that led to each implementation.

 

If you haven't already, I highly recommend you check out SolidFire's VVOLs features.  There is lots of really great functionality there, and it further removes storage management overhead from the virtualization administrator.  It's a great example of just how simple storage for virtualization can be, while at the same time not sacrificing features or functionality.

 

Hope that helps.

 

Andrew

If this post resolved your issue, please help others by selecting ACCEPT AS SOLUTION or adding a KUDO.