<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Active IQ Unified Manager — NetApp Community</title>
        <link>https://community.netapp.com/community/</link>
        <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2026 06:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
        <language>en</language>
            <description>Active IQ Unified Manager — NetApp Community</description>
    <atom:link href="https://community.netapp.com/community/discussions/tagged/active-iq-unified-manager/feed.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
        <title>Adding datasources to AIQUM 9.18 fails</title>
        <link>https://community.netapp.com/community/discussion/468003/adding-datasources-to-aiqum-9-18-fails</link>
        <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2026 00:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Active IQ</category>
        <dc:creator>mbeattie</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">468003@/community/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<div><p>Hey NetApp Community,</p><p>Just sharing this, hopefully it helps other customers if you encounter an issue with AIQUM 9.18 when attempting to add a datasource and receive the following error:</p><pre><code>Unable to add cluster datasource. This can occur if the clocks on the systems are not synchronized and the Active IQ Unified Manger HTTPS certificate start date is later than the date on the cluster, or if the cluster has reached the maximum number of EMS notification destinations.</code></pre><p>In the "<em><strong>C:\ProgramData\NetApp\OnCommandAppData\ocum\log\ocumserver.log</strong></em>" file you will notice the following error:</p><pre><code>2026-06-30 12:14:57,463 ERROR [admin] [default task-15] [c.n.o.r.m.e.GlobalExceptionHandler] Server returned HTTP status 500.HTTP error message :{"timestamp":"2026-06-30T02:14:56.724+00:00","status":500,"error":"Internal Server Error","path":"/acquisition-api/server/datasource"} com.netapp.dfm.collector.OcieException: Server returned HTTP status 500.HTTP error message :{"timestamp":"2026-06-30T02:14:56.724+00:00","status":500,"error":"Internal Server Error","path":"/acquisition-api/server/datasource"}</code></pre><p>Which is similar to this KB (but not the actual issue)&nbsp;<a title="https://kb.netapp.com/data-mgmt/AIQUM/AIQUM_Kbs/Unable_to_add_cluster_on_AIQUM_RHEL_due_to_missing_acquisition_user" href="https://kb.netapp.com/data-mgmt/AIQUM/AIQUM_Kbs/Unable_to_add_cluster_on_AIQUM_RHEL_due_to_missing_acquisition_user" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">https://kb.netapp.com/data-mgmt/AIQUM/AIQUM_Kbs/Unable_to_add_cluster_on_AIQUM_RHEL_due_to_missing_acquisition_user</a>&nbsp;</p><p>In the "<em><strong>C:\ProgramData\NetApp\OnCommandAppData\ocie\log\server_acq.log</strong></em>" file you will notice the following error:<br /><br /></p><pre><code>Error Payload from ONTAP: {"error":{"code":"983115","message":"Cannot complete the operation because the filter rules will exceed the maximum rules count (256)."}}</code></pre><p><br />Related KB articles:</p><ul><li><a title="https://kb.netapp.com/data-mgmt/AIQUM/AIQUM_Kbs/AIQUM_Cluster_Addition_Fails_Due_to_Expired_Certificate_or_Cloud_Agent_Issue" href="https://kb.netapp.com/data-mgmt/AIQUM/AIQUM_Kbs/AIQUM_Cluster_Addition_Fails_Due_to_Expired_Certificate_or_Cloud_Agent_Issue" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">https://kb.netapp.com/data-mgmt/AIQUM/AIQUM_Kbs/AIQUM_Cluster_Addition_Fails_Due_to_Expired_Certificate_or_Cloud_Agent_Issue</a>&nbsp;</li><li><a title="https://kb.netapp.com/data-mgmt/AIQUM/AIQUM_Kbs/AIQUM_fails_to_add_ONTAP_cluster_due_to_a_breach_of_max_number_of_EMS_notification_destinations" href="https://kb.netapp.com/data-mgmt/AIQUM/AIQUM_Kbs/AIQUM_fails_to_add_ONTAP_cluster_due_to_a_breach_of_max_number_of_EMS_notification_destinations" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">https://kb.netapp.com/data-mgmt/AIQUM/AIQUM_Kbs/AIQUM_fails_to_add_ONTAP_cluster_due_to_a_breach_of_max_number_of_EMS_notification_destinations</a>&nbsp;</li></ul><p>In the above KB it states that the "<em><strong>max-filter-rule-count</strong></em>" should be set to 256 but i found with AIQUM 9.18 I needed to increase this to 512. The solution was:</p><pre><code>cluster1::&gt; set diag

Warning: These diagnostic commands are for use by NetApp personnel only.
Do you want to continue? {y|n}: y

cluster1::*&gt; event config show -fields max-filter-count, max-filter-rule-count
max-filter-count max-filter-rule-count
---------------- ---------------------
50 256

cluster1::*&gt; event config modify -max-filter-rule-count 512</code></pre><p>Hope that helps</p><p>/Matt</p></div>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Active IQ Unfied Manager 9.18 ONTAP 9.17.1Px</title>
        <link>https://community.netapp.com/community/discussion/466819/active-iq-unfied-manager-9-18-ontap-9-17-1px</link>
        <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 12:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Active IQ</category>
        <dc:creator>AU-TT</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">466819@/community/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<div><p>I updated my Active IQ UnifiedManager from 9.16P2 to 9.18, and everything worked fine, including cluster discovery.<br />Now I&rsquo;ve updated a cluster to 9.17.1P6, and cluster discovery no longer works. I&rsquo;ve tried everything I can think of and searched everywhere, but unfortunately haven&rsquo;t found anything about this.</p><p>Does anyone know what this problem is?</p><p><br />Failure Reason: Monitoring refresh job ID 1f2fcec250a4451b:-58f305e3:19d967594cf:-7f98 for object &amp;#39;Cluster-Name&amp;#39; completed unsuccessfully (Status: FAI</p><p>Translated with DeepL.com (free version)</p></div>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Editing NaBOX alert rules (i.e.: Volume Full) to align with the AIUQUM Thresholds</title>
        <link>https://community.netapp.com/community/discussion/467859/editing-nabox-alert-rules-i-e-volume-full-to-align-with-the-aiuqum-thresholds</link>
        <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 15:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Active IQ</category>
        <dc:creator>AleTinivelli</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">467859@/community/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<div><p>Good day, we activated NaBox v4.2.0 email alerts, but we have to fine tune them, i.e. because thresholds differ from the one we defined in AIQUM.</p><p>What's the suggested way to proceed? import the&nbsp;<em>Data source-managed rules</em> in <em>Grafana-managed rules</em> in order to be able to edit them?</p><p>P.S.: we also currently find duplicated rules...</p><p><span><img src="https://us.v-cdn.net/6038798/uploads/migrated-images/33/33e2bd936b5c53dddccbf59e1762431d.png" role="button" title="grules.PNG" alt="grules.PNG" width="1565" /></span></p></div>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>NABOX_AN_Error_Occurred</title>
        <link>https://community.netapp.com/community/discussion/467366/nabox-an-error-occurred</link>
        <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 07:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Active IQ</category>
        <dc:creator>Sai1905</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">467366@/community/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<div><p>Hi Team,</p><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; We tried to add one of the clusters to the NABOX Tool, but we were unable to add it Successfully. It is showing the same error repeatedly. kindly suggest a solution for adding the below mention cluster. if required, we are ready to Upgrade the NABOX tool as Well.</p><p>Please review and provide your recommendation.</p></div>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Lockout, Lockout duration and Maximum of active sessions  in Active IQ Unified Manager settings</title>
        <link>https://community.netapp.com/community/discussion/465494/lockout-lockout-duration-and-maximum-of-active-sessions-in-active-iq-unified-manager-settings</link>
        <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2026 19:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Active IQ</category>
        <dc:creator>aboubeker</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">465494@/community/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<div><div><div><span>Hi,<br />Please, how to set up in&nbsp;Active IQ Unified Manager&nbsp; Version: 9.13 for a local accounts the following options :</span></div><div><span>Lockout after 5 unsuccessful attempts. The lockout duration to&nbsp; 30 minutes and a maximum of two active user sessions&nbsp; permitted .</span></div><div><span>Currently we installed&nbsp;Active IQ Unified Manager&nbsp; in a Virtual Machine (OVA)</span></div><div><span>Regards.</span></div></div></div>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Anlyze performance archives</title>
        <link>https://community.netapp.com/community/discussion/466750/anlyze-performance-archives</link>
        <pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 05:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Active IQ</category>
        <dc:creator>heshika</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">466750@/community/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<div><p><span>Hi team</span></p><p><span>I would like to understand if there is any details document / article to analyze</span><span>&nbsp;performance data collected as performance archive via an AutoSupport on Demand.</span></p></div>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>need to configure netapp harvest.</title>
        <link>https://community.netapp.com/community/discussion/466141/need-to-configure-netapp-harvest</link>
        <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2026 07:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Active IQ</category>
        <dc:creator>storageteamsha</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">466141@/community/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<div><p><span>I am trying to configure NetApp Harvest. we can't receive any logs in NetApp harvest&nbsp;</span></p><p><span>Can someone please help?</span></p></div>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Feature request - Volume view filter based on volume comment</title>
        <link>https://community.netapp.com/community/discussion/465720/feature-request-volume-view-filter-based-on-volume-comment</link>
        <pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2026 03:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Active IQ</category>
        <dc:creator>RJC</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">465720@/community/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<div><p>Hi All,</p><p>I'd like to produce Volume reports from AIQUM but I only want a subset of the Volumes. They span vservers and not all Volumes in a vserver are required. I'd like to be able to filter Volumes based on some assigned label, maybe in the volume comment.</p></div>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>fail to add a certificate for aium server</title>
        <link>https://community.netapp.com/community/discussion/465348/fail-to-add-a-certificate-for-aium-server</link>
        <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2026 16:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Active IQ</category>
        <dc:creator>grocanar</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">465348@/community/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<div><p>When i want to add a letsencrypt to my ocum server in the following adress&nbsp;</p><p><a href="https://ocum.admin.ibfj-evry.fr/certificate" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer">https://ocum.admin.ibfj-evry.fr/certificate</a></p><p>I got the following message&nbsp;<br /><span>Failed to install certificate: The certificate input is not valid. Either the Common Name (CN) of the host certificate is not valid or the host certificate does not belong to this host.</span></p><p><span>i have careffully the documentation here&nbsp;</span></p><p><span><a href="https://docs.netapp.com/us-en/active-iq-unified-manager/config/concept_install_https_certificate_generated_using_external_tools.html#format-for-loading-a-certificate-with-an-ec-key-pair" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">https://docs.netapp.com/us-en/active-iq-unified-manager/config/concept_install_https_certificate_generated_using_external_tools.html#format-for-loading-a-certificate-with-an-ec-key-pair</a></span></p><p><span>i have concerted the key to pkcs1 format and prepend it to the fullchain certificate</span></p><p><span>i have append too the root certificate.</span></p><p><span>the hostname of my machine is owum.admin.ibfj-evry.fr and the CN of the certificate is exactely the sam name.<br /><br />I don't know where to search further.&nbsp;&nbsp;</span></p></div>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Not able to add cluster onto Unified Manager</title>
        <link>https://community.netapp.com/community/discussion/457807/not-able-to-add-cluster-onto-unified-manager</link>
        <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2025 22:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Active IQ</category>
        <dc:creator>Brandon3</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">457807@/community/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<div><p>Unable to add cluster data source. This can occur if the clocks on the systems are not synchronized and the Active IQ Unified Manager HTTPS certificate start date is later than the date on the cluster, or if the cluster has reached the maximum number of EMS notification destinations.</p><p>Still getting this error after seeing that the clock systems were fine. The HTTPS cert on UM expires 2026 while the cluster HTTPS cert expires on a later date, 2027. The EMS notification was increased to the suggested amount (5)&nbsp; via:&nbsp;<a href="https://kb.netapp.com/data-mgmt/AIQUM/AIQUM_Kbs/fails_to_add_ONTAP_cluster_due_to_a_breach_of_max_number_of_EMS_notification_destinations" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">Active IQ Unified Manager fails to add ONTAP cluster due to a breach of max number of EMS notification destinations - NetApp Knowledge Base</a></p><p>Not sure why I'm not able to add any cluster to Active IQ UM.</p></div>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>NetApp Harvest: Performance Metrics Collection Issue</title>
        <link>https://community.netapp.com/community/discussion/464995/netapp-harvest-performance-metrics-collection-issue</link>
        <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2026 06:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Active IQ</category>
        <dc:creator>Manisinam</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">464995@/community/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<div><p>We are observing gaps in latency metrics graphs.&nbsp;</p><p>Errors in Harvest Logs:</p><p>poller_netapp-cmode-01.log:461:{"level":"info","Poller":"netapp-cmode-01","collector":"ZapiPerf:CIFSvserver","error":"API&nbsp;request&nbsp;rejected&nbsp;=&gt;&nbsp;Instance&nbsp;name&nbsp;was&nbsp;not&nbsp;set&nbsp;for&nbsp;given&nbsp;object.&nbsp;errNum=\"13001\"&nbsp;statusCode=\"0\"","task":"data","caller":"collector/collector.go:415","time":"2025-12-30T01:26:56Z","message":"Entering&nbsp;standby&nbsp;mode"}<br />poller_netapp-cmode-01.log:1830:{"level":"info","Poller":"netapp-cmode-01","collector":"ZapiPerf:NFSv3","error":"API&nbsp;request&nbsp;rejected&nbsp;=&gt;&nbsp;Instance&nbsp;name&nbsp;was&nbsp;not&nbsp;set&nbsp;for&nbsp;given&nbsp;object.&nbsp;errNum=\"13001\"&nbsp;statusCode=\"0\"","task":"data","caller":"collector/collector.go:415","time":"2025-12-30T01:58:12Z","message":"Entering&nbsp;standby&nbsp;mode"}</p></div>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>NetApp-harvest - Unable to list the volume usage metric values on prometheus using harvest exporter</title>
        <link>https://community.netapp.com/community/discussion/464539/netapp-harvest-unable-to-list-the-volume-usage-metric-values-on-prometheus-using-harvest-exporter</link>
        <pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2025 06:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Active IQ</category>
        <dc:creator>BigDataSupportTeam</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">464539@/community/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<div><p>NetApp-AFF-ONTAP - Unable to list the volume usage metric values on prometheus using harvest exporter.</p><p>Configured harvest exporter and initially it was fetching or populating values for all metrics.</p><p>No recent changes but it stopped populating values for volume related metrics.</p><p>On NetApp- ONTAP i could see lot of pending GET requests from harvest user in audit logs.</p><p>Issue observed with volume usage metrics and snapshot metrics&nbsp;volume_size_used,volume_size_available,volume_filesystem_size,volume_size_total,volume_size_used_percent,volume_inode_used_percent,volume_inode_used_percent,volume_snapshots_size_used,volume_snapshots_size_available</p><p>harvest.yml&nbsp;</p><p>----------------</p><p>Admin:<br /><br />Tools:</p><p>Exporters:<br />prometheus:<br />exporter: Prometheus<br />local_http_addr: 0.0.0.0<br />port: 12990</p><p><br />Defaults:<br />collectors:<br />- Rest<br />- RestPerf<br /># - Zapi<br /># - ZapiPerf<br /># - Ems<br /># - StorageGrid<br />use_insecure_tls: true</p><p>Pollers:<br />&lt;dc-name&gt;:<br />datacenter: &lt;dc-name&gt;<br />addr: &lt;address&gt;<br />username: harvest<br />password: &lt;password&gt;<br />exporters:<br />- prometheus<br />collectors:<br />- Rest<br />- RestPerf<br />objects:<br />volumes: true<br />svm: true<br />aggregate: true<br />node: true<br />lif: true<br />qos: true<br />svm_include: ["*"]</p></div>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>how to migrate AIQUM to a new server</title>
        <link>https://community.netapp.com/community/discussion/464512/how-to-migrate-aiqum-to-a-new-server</link>
        <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2025 10:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Active IQ</category>
        <dc:creator>grocanar</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">464512@/community/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<div><p>Hi</p><p>I have an old installation of AIQUM version 9.14 on an Centos7 server and i would like to move it on an RHL9 server.&nbsp;</p><p>As far as i can see i should first migration to a RHEL8 server with the 9.14 version. Then upgrade on place to 9.16 and after migrate to the RHEL9 server with a 9.16 version.&nbsp;</p><p>But i have a problem with the firt step.&nbsp;</p><p>I have installed my RHEL8 server with 9.14 version.</p><p>I can connect with no problem.</p><p>i have make a baclup on my old server tansfer the required files</p><p>I have restored the filed with the maintenance console on the RHEL8 server. I got no error</p><p>but rght now i can't log on my new server on the web interface.<br />i never get the banner for entering credentials.&nbsp;<br /><br />Did i use the good way to make this migration?&nbsp;</p></div>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Active IQ Unified Manager 9.16 Values that should be GB are reported as TB , values that are TB are</title>
        <link>https://community.netapp.com/community/discussion/459665/active-iq-unified-manager-9-16-values-that-should-be-gb-are-reported-as-tb-values-that-are-tb-are</link>
        <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2025 16:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Active IQ</category>
        <dc:creator>xiawiz</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">459665@/community/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<div><p>Active IQ Unified Manager 9.16 Values that should be GB are reported as TB , values that are TB are reported as PB.&nbsp;&nbsp; <span>The volume qtree quota overcommitted threshold set at 400% is breached. 25.88 PiB (94642.86%) of 28.00 TiB is committed. 6.82 TiB (24.37%) is used.</span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><div><div><div>Details (Physical)</div><div><div><div><div><div>Total Capacity</div></div>40.00 TiB100.00%</div></div><div></div><div><div><div><div>Data Capacity</div></div>28.00 TiB70.00%</div></div><div><div><div><div>Used</div></div>6.82 TiB24.37%</div></div></div></div><div><div><div><div><div><div>Free</div></div>21.18 TiB75.63%</div></div></div></div><div><div><div></div><div><div><div><div>Snapshot Reserve</div></div>12.00 TiB30.00%</div></div><div><div><div><div>Used</div></div>8.19 MiB0.00%</div></div></div></div><div><div><div><div><div><div>Free</div></div>12.00 TiB100.00%</div></div><div></div></div></div></div><div><div><div><div><div>Volume Thresholds</div></div><div></div><div><div><div><div>Nearly Full Threshold (Global level)</div></div>26.32 TiB94%</div></div><div><div><div><div>Full Threshold (Global level)</div></div>27.44 TiB98%</div></div><div></div></div></div></div><div><div><div><div><div><div><div>Other Details</div></div></div></div></div></div><div><div><div><div><div>Qtree Quota Committed Capacity:</div><div><div>25.88 PiB</div></div></div></div><div><div><div>Qtree Quota Over committed Capacity:</div><div><div>25.85 PiB</div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Aggregate space configuration</title>
        <link>https://community.netapp.com/community/discussion/462015/aggregate-space-configuration</link>
        <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2025 16:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Active IQ</category>
        <dc:creator>aggregate</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">462015@/community/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<div><p>Hi Team,</p><p>I need your help to understand NetApp aggregate configuration; there is space mismatch on GUI and CLI.</p></div>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>NetApp ActiveIQ Unified Manager - HTTPS</title>
        <link>https://community.netapp.com/community/discussion/461992/netapp-activeiq-unified-manager-https</link>
        <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2025 10:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Active IQ</category>
        <dc:creator>NEO-BAHAMUT</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">461992@/community/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<div><p>Hi All,&nbsp;</p><p>We have recently installed NetApp IQ Unified Manager, and in this last week ive upgraded the system to the latest version at this time, 9.16P2.</p><p>I'm trying to configure the system to use a ca generated certificate rather than the self-generated cert. - Now I dont claim to be any sort of PKI expert, but i have generated lots of certs in my time and got them working. However for this i am sort of stumped.</p><p>I've used the GUI to generate the CSR file. I've submitted this to our internal CA and i've got a .cer file back. Ive converted it to a .pem file and when i try to upload the cert if gives me the following error.</p><p><span><img src="https://us.v-cdn.net/6038798/uploads/migrated-images/a2/a2167cda2e50917d18c995c5f64e81db.png" role="button" title="NEOBAHAMUT_0-1752574841794.png" alt="NEOBAHAMUT_0-1752574841794.png" width="696" /></span></p><p>When i install the cert in windows I can see that there is a full chain on the cert. ActiveIQ doesn't appear to be able to see that. I'm guessing its something im doing wrong.</p><p>Can anyone confirm the steps that do work and i can try again. Or is this a bug?</p></div>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Unified Manager SAML - Entra ID?</title>
        <link>https://community.netapp.com/community/discussion/461508/unified-manager-saml-entra-id</link>
        <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 20:30:37 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Active IQ</category>
        <dc:creator>uphill</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">461508@/community/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<div><p>For 9.16 still it only shows this as validated providers</p><ul><li><p>Shibboleth</p></li><li><p>Active Directory Federation Services (ADFS)</p></li></ul><p>When is support for Entra ID or any of the other providers coming for UM?</p><p>Reason I ask is because we've tried (with less than stellar results) to make this work. Note the word "tried". It works for a bit, then fails for all users and has to be disabled. More or less wondering if SAML is one of those features which might work, but there's no real ongoing validation or testing going on to provide some sort of recommendations for making it reliable.</p><p>If anyone's using this with no issues, there must be something the docs don't provide.</p><p>thanks</p></div>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>one node is down and its sitting at &quot;Waiting for Giveback&quot;</title>
        <link>https://community.netapp.com/community/discussion/461053/one-node-is-down-and-its-sitting-at-waiting-for-giveback</link>
        <pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2025 18:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Active IQ</category>
        <dc:creator>Srinivas9091</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">461053@/community/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<div><p>Hi All - I have situation here (in C mode),&nbsp; &nbsp;</p><p>Controller A is down and its sitting at "Waiting for Giveback".</p><p>Controller B is completely dead. I cann't execute cf give here.</p><p>In this case how I can make normal boot controller A.&nbsp;</p><p>Kindly do the needful.&nbsp;</p></div>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Ontap PowerShell Toolkit:  How to create a security descriptor from the DACLs of an existing dir</title>
        <link>https://community.netapp.com/community/discussion/127043/ontap-powershell-toolkit-how-to-create-a-security-descriptor-from-the-dacls-of-an-existing-dir</link>
        <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2017 19:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Active IQ</category>
        <dc:creator>ChadPruden</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">127043@/community/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<div><p>I'm looking for help on creating some powershell code that retrieves the current DACLs of a volume (or directory path) and stores it as a security descriptor. &nbsp;I had come across this page on the web (<a href="http://www.craig-tolley.co.uk/2016/02/09/assigning-permissions-to-a-volume-through-the-netapp-powershell-toolkit/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer">http://www.craig-tolley.co.uk/2016/02/09/assigning-permissions-to-a-volume-through-the-netapp-powershell-toolkit/</a>) and it guided me through applying new permissions using the OnTap Powershell toolkit - however I cannot devise a way to modify the code so that an ACE can be removed or added to the ACL (Security Descriptor).</p><p>I presume it's some combination of&nbsp;Get-NcFileDirectorySecurity and (New-NcFileDirectorySecurityNtfs or&nbsp;Add-NcFileDirectorySecurityNtfsDacl). &nbsp;I've investigated all of the&nbsp;<span>*NcFileDirectorySecurity* cmdlets, and only Get-NCFileDirectorySecurity appears to retrieve currently applied permissions, but it cannot be pipe'd into another cmdlet <span title=":disappointed_face:">&#128542;</span></span></p><p>My larger objective is to build a WFA command that allows a user to add/remove an AD Group from their volume. &nbsp; I've found the Powershell toolkit to be much quicker and straightforward than using (Get-Acl / Set-Acl)</p><p>connect-NcController $ClusterName</p><p>$volName = "vol_test_3"<br />$Vserver = "svm-lab-a"<br /><br /></p><p>Get-NcFileDirectorySecurity -Path "/$volName" -VserverContext $Vserver | New-NcFileDirectorySecurityNtfs -SecurityDescriptor $VolName &nbsp; &nbsp; #this part doesn't work! &nbsp; First cmdlet returns ACLs, but doesn't store it within SecurityDescriptor.</p><p>Get-NcFileDirectorySecurityNtfsDacl -SecurityDescriptor $volName -Vserver $vserver &nbsp; #my output is {Administrators,Users,CREATOR OWNER, SYSTEM}. &nbsp; I'm hoping to capture the DACLs of "/$VolName" - such as displayed by&nbsp;(Get-NcFileDirectorySecurity -Path "/$volName" -VserverContext $Vserver).acls</p></div>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Remove System not possible</title>
        <link>https://community.netapp.com/community/discussion/451249/remove-system-not-possible</link>
        <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2024 06:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Active IQ</category>
        <dc:creator>sanadmin_do</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">451249@/community/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<div><p><span><span>We have an old FAS2520 in the cluster setup.</span></span> <span><span>We want to remove these.</span></span> <span><span>Unfortunately we cannot remove the system, it remains at Operation "Deletion" (Operation state "In Progress").</span></span> <span><span>We restarted the Active IQ Manager, to no avail.</span></span> <span><span>The system has also been decommissioned for a long time.</span></span> <span><span>We use Active IQ Manager 9.13P1.&nbsp;<span>Does anyone have an idea what else we can do?</span></span></span></p></div>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Is AIQ a hybrid or on-prem solution?</title>
        <link>https://community.netapp.com/community/discussion/459245/is-aiq-a-hybrid-or-on-prem-solution</link>
        <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2025 05:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Active IQ</category>
        <dc:creator>Pooja2</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">459245@/community/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<div><p>Is NetApp Active IQ a hybrid or on-prem solution?</p></div>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Unable to create Dashboards or edit panels</title>
        <link>https://community.netapp.com/community/discussion/458678/unable-to-create-dashboards-or-edit-panels</link>
        <pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2025 19:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Active IQ</category>
        <dc:creator>JoeFoster</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">458678@/community/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<div><p>Hey team!&nbsp; We just installed NAbox and started using grafana.&nbsp; Right after installing it I was able to edit panels.&nbsp; I now get the same error when trying to create a Dashboard.</p><p>I searched the community but wasn't able to find anything that looked like the problem I'm having.&nbsp; I'm logged in as admin, I've restarted NAbox, relaunched browser, etc.&nbsp; &nbsp;all the normal things.</p><p>I appreciate everyone's help that can give it.&nbsp;&nbsp;</p><p>When trying to create a new dashboard I get this error:</p><h2 id="toc-hId-1706701376">An unexpected error happened</h2><p>Details to the error are:</p><p>DetailsSecurityError: Failed to construct 'Worker': Access to the script at 'blob:<a href="https://dtxcp001inf15/8fb0350c-1f46-45c6-8b6f-41c37ddc6014" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer">https://dtxcp001inf15/8fb0350c-1f46-45c6-8b6f-41c37ddc6014</a>' is denied by the document's Content Security Policy.<br />at Jt (<a href="https://dtxcp001inf15/grafana/public/build/1518.a3f1f690c084a37f01c7.js:39:138757" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer">https://dtxcp001inf15/grafana/public/build/1518.a3f1f690c084a37f01c7.js:39:138757</a>) at VS (<a href="https://dtxcp001inf15/grafana/public/build/1518.a3f1f690c084a37f01c7.js:39:368708" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer">https://dtxcp001inf15/grafana/public/build/1518.a3f1f690c084a37f01c7.js:39:368708</a>) at In (<a href="https://dtxcp001inf15/grafana/public/build/8779.e255d939a1787b5617b6.js:1:2522" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer">https://dtxcp001inf15/grafana/public/build/8779.e255d939a1787b5617b6.js:1:2522</a>) at Xo (<a href="https://dtxcp001inf15/grafana/public/build/8779.e255d939a1787b5617b6.js:51:32923" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer">https://dtxcp001inf15/grafana/public/build/8779.e255d939a1787b5617b6.js:51:32923</a>) at Suspense at g (<a href="https://dtxcp001inf15/grafana/public/build/322.177b4bb01c5d74f9b28f.js:12:133441" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer">https://dtxcp001inf15/grafana/public/build/322.177b4bb01c5d74f9b28f.js:12:133441</a>) at th (<a href="https://dtxcp001inf15/grafana/public/build/322.177b4bb01c5d74f9b28f.js:2378:39173" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer">https://dtxcp001inf15/grafana/public/build/322.177b4bb01c5d74f9b28f.js:2378:39173</a>) at tt (<a href="https://dtxcp001inf15/grafana/public/build/1518.a3f1f690c084a37f01c7.js:295:25390" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer">https://dtxcp001inf15/grafana/public/build/1518.a3f1f690c084a37f01c7.js:295:25390</a>) at Re (<a href="https://dtxcp001inf15/grafana/public/build/1518.a3f1f690c084a37f01c7.js:295:4581" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer">https://dtxcp001inf15/grafana/public/build/1518.a3f1f690c084a37f01c7.js:295:4581</a>) at ot (<a href="https://dtxcp001inf15/grafana/public/build/1518.a3f1f690c084a37f01c7.js:295:12260" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer">https://dtxcp001inf15/grafana/public/build/1518.a3f1f690c084a37f01c7.js:295:12260</a>) at zt (<a href="https://dtxcp001inf15/grafana/public/build/1518.a3f1f690c084a37f01c7.js:286:18058" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer">https://dtxcp001inf15/grafana/public/build/1518.a3f1f690c084a37f01c7.js:286:18058</a>) at tt (<a href="https://dtxcp001inf15/grafana/public/build/1518.a3f1f690c084a37f01c7.js:295:27584" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer">https://dtxcp001inf15/grafana/public/build/1518.a3f1f690c084a37f01c7.js:295:27584</a>) at div at <a href="https://dtxcp001inf15/grafana/public/build/3719.c065b2e146c4c8347d51.js:1:135436" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer">https://dtxcp001inf15/grafana/public/build/3719.c065b2e146c4c8347d51.js:1:135436</a> at main at div at div at div at Pf (<a href="https://dtxcp001inf15/grafana/public/build/322.177b4bb01c5d74f9b28f.js:2380:4677" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer">https://dtxcp001inf15/grafana/public/build/322.177b4bb01c5d74f9b28f.js:2380:4677</a>) at Af (<a href="https://dtxcp001inf15/grafana/public/build/322.177b4bb01c5d74f9b28f.js:2380:9995" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer">https://dtxcp001inf15/grafana/public/build/322.177b4bb01c5d74f9b28f.js:2380:9995</a>) at Re (<a href="https://dtxcp001inf15/grafana/public/build/1518.a3f1f690c084a37f01c7.js:295:4581" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer">https://dtxcp001inf15/grafana/public/build/1518.a3f1f690c084a37f01c7.js:295:4581</a>) at ot (<a href="https://dtxcp001inf15/grafana/public/build/1518.a3f1f690c084a37f01c7.js:295:12260" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer">https://dtxcp001inf15/grafana/public/build/1518.a3f1f690c084a37f01c7.js:295:12260</a>) at Ke (<a href="https://dtxcp001inf15/grafana/public/build/1518.a3f1f690c084a37f01c7.js:295:11590" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer">https://dtxcp001inf15/grafana/public/build/1518.a3f1f690c084a37f01c7.js:295:11590</a>) at un (<a href="https://dtxcp001inf15/grafana/public/build/1518.a3f1f690c084a37f01c7.js:286:18360" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer">https://dtxcp001inf15/grafana/public/build/1518.a3f1f690c084a37f01c7.js:286:18360</a>) at v (<a href="https://dtxcp001inf15/grafana/public/build/322.177b4bb01c5d74f9b28f.js:5:188553" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer">https://dtxcp001inf15/grafana/public/build/322.177b4bb01c5d74f9b28f.js:5:188553</a>) at tt (<a href="https://dtxcp001inf15/grafana/public/build/1518.a3f1f690c084a37f01c7.js:295:21551" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer">https://dtxcp001inf15/grafana/public/build/1518.a3f1f690c084a37f01c7.js:295:21551</a>) at Kc (<a href="https://dtxcp001inf15/grafana/public/build/322.177b4bb01c5d74f9b28f.js:2380:11398" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer">https://dtxcp001inf15/grafana/public/build/322.177b4bb01c5d74f9b28f.js:2380:11398</a>) at div at Xl (<a href="https://dtxcp001inf15/grafana/public/build/322.177b4bb01c5d74f9b28f.js:2378:18744" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer">https://dtxcp001inf15/grafana/public/build/322.177b4bb01c5d74f9b28f.js:2378:18744</a>) at y (<a href="https://dtxcp001inf15/grafana/public/build/1518.a3f1f690c084a37f01c7.js:151:9173" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer">https://dtxcp001inf15/grafana/public/build/1518.a3f1f690c084a37f01c7.js:151:9173</a>) at C (<a href="https://dtxcp001inf15/grafana/public/build/4239.c2eca2b0222ddf40980b.js:183:17550" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer">https://dtxcp001inf15/grafana/public/build/4239.c2eca2b0222ddf40980b.js:183:17550</a>) at d (<a href="https://dtxcp001inf15/grafana/public/build/3719.c065b2e146c4c8347d51.js:24:12171" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer">https://dtxcp001inf15/grafana/public/build/3719.c065b2e146c4c8347d51.js:24:12171</a>) at g (<a href="https://dtxcp001inf15/grafana/public/build/322.177b4bb01c5d74f9b28f.js:12:133441" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer">https://dtxcp001inf15/grafana/public/build/322.177b4bb01c5d74f9b28f.js:12:133441</a>) at i (<a href="https://dtxcp001inf15/grafana/public/build/322.177b4bb01c5d74f9b28f.js:12:133950" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer">https://dtxcp001inf15/grafana/public/build/322.177b4bb01c5d74f9b28f.js:12:133950</a>) at pn (<a href="https://dtxcp001inf15/grafana/public/build/4239.c2eca2b0222ddf40980b.js:187:507" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer">https://dtxcp001inf15/grafana/public/build/4239.c2eca2b0222ddf40980b.js:187:507</a>) at jf (<a href="https://dtxcp001inf15/grafana/public/build/322.177b4bb01c5d74f9b28f.js:2380:13056" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer">https://dtxcp001inf15/grafana/public/build/322.177b4bb01c5d74f9b28f.js:2380:13056</a>)</p></div>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>Inquiry Regarding Upgrade Path from NetApp Active IQ Unified Manager 9.12 to 9.14</title>
        <link>https://community.netapp.com/community/discussion/458753/inquiry-regarding-upgrade-path-from-netapp-active-iq-unified-manager-9-12-to-9-14</link>
        <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2025 13:49:27 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Active IQ</category>
        <dc:creator>Besi</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">458753@/community/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<div><p>I am currently planning to upgrade my NetApp Active IQ Unified Manager from version 9.12 to 9.14, but I have found that the available upgrade paths listed in the support documentation only include upgrades from version 9.11 to 9.13, 9.13 to 9.14, and so on.</p><p>Could you please confirm if it&rsquo;s possible to directly upgrade from version 9.12 to 9.14, or would I need to upgrade through an intermediate version (e.g., 9.12 &rarr; 9.13 &rarr; 9.14)?</p></div>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>NABox Public Dashboards</title>
        <link>https://community.netapp.com/community/discussion/457668/nabox-public-dashboards</link>
        <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2025 23:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Active IQ</category>
        <dc:creator>Nathan_Zingg</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">457668@/community/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<div><p>When I initially tried to use NABox Public Dashboard links for use in an executive summary, I got a warning about template variables.<br />I cloned a few panels into a new dashboard and hardcoded the template variables values.<br />That worked fine and public dashboard link appears correctly.&nbsp;<br />However when I browse to the public link, the dashboard comes up, but each panel reports "No data" and an "Internal Server Error" pops up on the screen.<br /><br />Has anyone gotten NABox Public Dashboard links working?<br /><br /><strong>Currently running:<br />NAbox</strong> v4.0.4 (b358e0d)<br /><strong>Harvest</strong> 24.05.2&nbsp;<br /><strong>Victoria Metrics</strong> 2.24.0<br /><br />Thanks in advance for any guidance.<br />- Nathan Zingg</p><div></div><div></div></div>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>IN CDOT, what would be the  Best practices for volume and Lun  size in creation</title>
        <link>https://community.netapp.com/community/discussion/148356/in-cdot-what-would-be-the-best-practices-for-volume-and-lun-size-in-creation</link>
        <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2019 18:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Active IQ</category>
        <dc:creator>RSEKHAR84</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">148356@/community/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<div><p>IN CDOT, what would be the Best practices for creating volume and Lun settings and sizes. please</p></div>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>tomcat CVE-2024-38286</title>
        <link>https://community.netapp.com/community/discussion/457398/tomcat-cve-2024-38286</link>
        <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2024 15:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Active IQ</category>
        <dc:creator>cheese123</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">457398@/community/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<div><p><a href="https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20241101-0010/" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow">https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20241101-0010/</a></p><p>will that get fixed in older releases (9.14), too?</p></div>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
    <item>
        <title>ActiveIQ Remote Authentication fails</title>
        <link>https://community.netapp.com/community/discussion/154764/activeiq-remote-authentication-fails</link>
        <pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2020 10:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
        <category>Active IQ</category>
        <dc:creator>Sheetal15</dc:creator>
        <guid isPermaLink="false">154764@/community/discussions</guid>
        <description><![CDATA[<div><p>Hi,</p><p>I am trying to set Remote Authentication using Active Directory, but despite configuring with relevant information, I am getting error as attached when performing Test Authentication.&nbsp; Any help will be greatly appreciated.&nbsp;</p><p>Thanks &amp; regards,</p></div>]]>
        </description>
    </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
