<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Need Help on NetApp Ontap 9.5SP1 [VMware] / Hardware Raid 6 [Cisco UCS240M5] in Ask The Experts</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Ask-The-Experts/Need-Help-on-NetApp-Ontap-9-5SP1-VMware-Hardware-Raid-6-Cisco-UCS240M5/m-p/150999#M810</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Putting all aggregate in one node is not a recomended solution fro Metrocluster SDS .&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The Select VM uses VMDK&amp;nbsp; as Disk from Host datastore so its the Host vendor who should be responsible for its expansion .&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I don't think we have any way to control that .&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 05:57:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>shuklas</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-09-16T05:57:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Need Help on NetApp Ontap 9.5SP1 [VMware] / Hardware Raid 6 [Cisco UCS240M5]</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Ask-The-Experts/Need-Help-on-NetApp-Ontap-9-5SP1-VMware-Hardware-Raid-6-Cisco-UCS240M5/m-p/150881#M791</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Need Help on NetApp Ontap 9.5SP1 [VMware] / Hardware Raid 6 [Cisco UCS240M5]&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Hi Experts , I need your help regarding our NetApp infrastructure.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We have a NetApp OnTap Select 9.5 on VMware &lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt; 2 nodes HA Stretch Metro Cluster SDS (Network interlink 10GB with jumbo frame)&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt; 1 node per site separed by 6 Miles&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt; 1 Aggregates by Site (4 aggregates with plex1)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Plex: /&lt;STRONG&gt;aggr1_xxx/plex0&lt;/STRONG&gt; (online, normal, active, pool0) &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Plex: /&lt;STRONG&gt;aggr1_xxx/plex0&lt;/STRONG&gt; (online, normal, active, pool0) &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Plex: /&lt;STRONG&gt;aggr1_xxx/plex1&lt;/STRONG&gt; (online, normal, active, pool1) &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Plex: /&lt;STRONG&gt;aggr1_xxx/plex1&lt;/STRONG&gt; (online, normal, active, pool1) &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;We added space by installing new SSD disks to our current RAID6 hosted by a Cisco UCS (6 SSD / 3.5TB)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The expanding process takes a while , more than 2 months &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":disappointed_face:"&gt;😞&lt;/span&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Cisco Engeeneer has replied this is a normal beahavior when you add 20 TB.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Have you got any inputs to improve the processes on the second node and avoiding this uncomfortable situation ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Can we use only 1 node for hosting the both aggregates (putting the both aggregates read and write) and rebuild the raid from scratch on the remaing node ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your help and support&lt;BR /&gt;Kind Regards&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2019 15:06:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Ask-The-Experts/Need-Help-on-NetApp-Ontap-9-5SP1-VMware-Hardware-Raid-6-Cisco-UCS240M5/m-p/150881#M791</guid>
      <dc:creator>CLA</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-11T15:06:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Need Help on NetApp Ontap 9.5SP1 [VMware] / Hardware Raid 6 [Cisco UCS240M5]</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Ask-The-Experts/Need-Help-on-NetApp-Ontap-9-5SP1-VMware-Hardware-Raid-6-Cisco-UCS240M5/m-p/150999#M810</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Putting all aggregate in one node is not a recomended solution fro Metrocluster SDS .&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The Select VM uses VMDK&amp;nbsp; as Disk from Host datastore so its the Host vendor who should be responsible for its expansion .&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I don't think we have any way to control that .&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 05:57:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Ask-The-Experts/Need-Help-on-NetApp-Ontap-9-5SP1-VMware-Hardware-Raid-6-Cisco-UCS240M5/m-p/150999#M810</guid>
      <dc:creator>shuklas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-16T05:57:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

