<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic XenServer, FC protocol and SnapManager products in Additional Virtualization Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Additional-Virtualization-Discussions/XenServer-FC-protocol-and-SnapManager-products/m-p/79345#M31</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am designing an environment that will use XenServer for virtualization, and will virtualized Exchange 2003 and SQL 2005 servers. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can I use the associated SnapManager products (SQL, Exchange, Oracle) with XenServer VMs using fibre channel as my protocol of choice on this Windows 2003 based VMs?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In a VMWare environment I would use Raw Device Mappings, but I can't figure out if something similar can be done in XenServer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have reviewed the best practice guide here:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://media.netapp.com/documents/tr-3732.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;http://media.netapp.com/documents/tr-3732.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thoughts?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Gerry&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:23:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>thome</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:23:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>XenServer, FC protocol and SnapManager products</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Additional-Virtualization-Discussions/XenServer-FC-protocol-and-SnapManager-products/m-p/79345#M31</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am designing an environment that will use XenServer for virtualization, and will virtualized Exchange 2003 and SQL 2005 servers. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can I use the associated SnapManager products (SQL, Exchange, Oracle) with XenServer VMs using fibre channel as my protocol of choice on this Windows 2003 based VMs?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In a VMWare environment I would use Raw Device Mappings, but I can't figure out if something similar can be done in XenServer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have reviewed the best practice guide here:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://media.netapp.com/documents/tr-3732.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;http://media.netapp.com/documents/tr-3732.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thoughts?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Gerry&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:23:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Additional-Virtualization-Discussions/XenServer-FC-protocol-and-SnapManager-products/m-p/79345#M31</guid>
      <dc:creator>thome</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:23:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>XenServer, FC protocol and SnapManager products</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Additional-Virtualization-Discussions/XenServer-FC-protocol-and-SnapManager-products/m-p/79350#M32</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Gerry,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;just wondering how you got on with this, as I've got a similar environment where XenServer 5.6 with FC LUNs will be used and they would also like to use SMSQL &amp;amp; SME for the MSSQL and Exchange VMs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Did you need to directly map the LUNs via iSCSI to the VMs for Snapdrive/snapmanager to work, or were you able to get FC LUNs to work ok with Snapdrive on the VM through XenServer?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;John&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 00:41:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Additional-Virtualization-Discussions/XenServer-FC-protocol-and-SnapManager-products/m-p/79350#M32</guid>
      <dc:creator>jherlihy1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-11-04T00:41:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>XenServer, FC protocol and SnapManager products</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Additional-Virtualization-Discussions/XenServer-FC-protocol-and-SnapManager-products/m-p/79355#M33</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; Hmmm.. just found this on FieldPortal which says NO to all the above: &lt;A href="https://fieldportal.netapp.com/ci_getfile.asp?method=1&amp;amp;uid=6347&amp;amp;docid=32820" target="_blank"&gt;https://fieldportal.netapp.com/ci_getfile.asp?method=1&amp;amp;uid=6347&amp;amp;docid=32820&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 01:15:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Additional-Virtualization-Discussions/XenServer-FC-protocol-and-SnapManager-products/m-p/79355#M33</guid>
      <dc:creator>jherlihy1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-11-04T01:15:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>XenServer, FC protocol and SnapManager products</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Additional-Virtualization-Discussions/XenServer-FC-protocol-and-SnapManager-products/m-p/79360#M34</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;A _jive_internal="true" class="jiveTT-hover-user jive-username-link" href="https://community.netapp.com/people/jherlihy-1" id="jive-684916211597243053204" target="_blank"&gt;jherlihy-1&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Citrix recommends as a best practice to use NFS for the VM repository, for SnapManager I would go with iSCSI (XS don't support raw device mapping), if you are concerned about performance i think the smart move is to use 10Gb ethernet.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 20:35:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Additional-Virtualization-Discussions/XenServer-FC-protocol-and-SnapManager-products/m-p/79360#M34</guid>
      <dc:creator>ralfaro01zero</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-11-04T20:35:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>XenServer, FC protocol and SnapManager products</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Additional-Virtualization-Discussions/XenServer-FC-protocol-and-SnapManager-products/m-p/79365#M35</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please open a PVR with customer name and provide all details. I have received 4 PVRs so far. I believe there are more opportunities out there but not hearing them so I encourage folks to open a PVR. We are working on putting together a plan to formally qualify SMxin XenServer environment&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2011 08:14:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Additional-Virtualization-Discussions/XenServer-FC-protocol-and-SnapManager-products/m-p/79365#M35</guid>
      <dc:creator>gautamj</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-11-05T08:14:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>XenServer, FC protocol and SnapManager products</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Additional-Virtualization-Discussions/XenServer-FC-protocol-and-SnapManager-products/m-p/79370#M36</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for that - that's the conclusion I came to as well although I couldn't find it documented that Citrix actually recommends that. Do you have a URL (off the top of your head:) that shows that?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I found some posts which stated that any XS VMs which had Snapdrive installed (for use with SnapManager etc) had trouble booting and running normal backups with VSS if their non-NetApp disks (ie C: drive) were not on NFS. Something to do with XS StorageLink creating a separate LUN for every disk on a VM (including the C: drive) and mapping through the physical device name (ie "NETAPP LUN") which was confusing Snapdrive when the VSS hardware provider was called.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;John&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 03:25:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Additional-Virtualization-Discussions/XenServer-FC-protocol-and-SnapManager-products/m-p/79370#M36</guid>
      <dc:creator>jherlihy1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-11-07T03:25:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>XenServer, FC protocol and SnapManager products</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Additional-Virtualization-Discussions/XenServer-FC-protocol-and-SnapManager-products/m-p/79375#M37</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't have a link right now, but I remember that it was an exam question &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="grin" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.netapp.com/4.5.5/images/emoticons/grin.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 03:38:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Additional-Virtualization-Discussions/XenServer-FC-protocol-and-SnapManager-products/m-p/79375#M37</guid>
      <dc:creator>ralfaro01zero</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-11-07T03:38:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: XenServer, FC protocol and SnapManager products</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Additional-Virtualization-Discussions/XenServer-FC-protocol-and-SnapManager-products/m-p/79380#M38</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anything new on this?&amp;nbsp; I'm hearing from customers who would like to run SME in Xen-hosted VMs, but I don't believe NetApp supports that yet.&amp;nbsp; You can map to "raw" NetApp LUNs using Storage Link in Xen, but the SD/SME support just isn't there yet, correct?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2012 23:10:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Additional-Virtualization-Discussions/XenServer-FC-protocol-and-SnapManager-products/m-p/79380#M38</guid>
      <dc:creator>lederman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-09-05T23:10:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

