<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ONTAP Cloud HA at two AZ region in Cloud Volumes ONTAP</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Cloud-Volumes-ONTAP/ONTAP-Cloud-HA-at-two-AZ-region/m-p/124305#M33</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi there,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ONTAP Cloud HA can work on top of 2 AZs only. This setup, while working, is not optimal in a way that it may not save you from AZ failure,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;but it is good for any other failure.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The spread of instances should be one data node per AZ and the mediator in one of them.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If the AZ without the mediator fails - You'd have HA.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;if the AZ with the mediator fails - The other node may still work, but you won't have HA and there would be no failover.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It would still protect you from instance/storage/network failure to one of the data nodes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope that helps,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yaron Haimsohn&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Solution Architect Team Lead&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cloud Manager&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2016 08:59:49 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>yaronh</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-10-18T08:59:49Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ONTAP Cloud HA at two AZ region</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Cloud-Volumes-ONTAP/ONTAP-Cloud-HA-at-two-AZ-region/m-p/124293#M32</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would like to ask regarding ONTAP Cloud HA at AWS Tokyo region.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Tokyo region has two Availability zone. So, we cannot create the&amp;nbsp;mediator at individual&amp;nbsp;AZ.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Are there any good methodologies for that?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Regards,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 18:37:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Cloud-Volumes-ONTAP/ONTAP-Cloud-HA-at-two-AZ-region/m-p/124293#M32</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mikky</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T18:37:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ONTAP Cloud HA at two AZ region</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Cloud-Volumes-ONTAP/ONTAP-Cloud-HA-at-two-AZ-region/m-p/124305#M33</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi there,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ONTAP Cloud HA can work on top of 2 AZs only. This setup, while working, is not optimal in a way that it may not save you from AZ failure,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;but it is good for any other failure.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The spread of instances should be one data node per AZ and the mediator in one of them.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If the AZ without the mediator fails - You'd have HA.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;if the AZ with the mediator fails - The other node may still work, but you won't have HA and there would be no failover.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It would still protect you from instance/storage/network failure to one of the data nodes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope that helps,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yaron Haimsohn&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Solution Architect Team Lead&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cloud Manager&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2016 08:59:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Cloud-Volumes-ONTAP/ONTAP-Cloud-HA-at-two-AZ-region/m-p/124305#M33</guid>
      <dc:creator>yaronh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-18T08:59:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ONTAP Cloud HA at two AZ region</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Cloud-Volumes-ONTAP/ONTAP-Cloud-HA-at-two-AZ-region/m-p/124315#M34</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,yaronh&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your reply!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt;If the AZ without the mediator fails - You'd have HA.&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;gt;if the AZ with the mediator fails - The other node may still work, but you won't have HA and there would be no failover.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So,my understanding of your senario is that&lt;BR /&gt;we should deploy the primary volume on the AZ without the mediator node only.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This senario is always to keep the volume and services cotinutiees!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please let me know if there are any mistakes in that.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;regards,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2016 09:42:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Cloud-Volumes-ONTAP/ONTAP-Cloud-HA-at-two-AZ-region/m-p/124315#M34</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mikky</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-18T09:42:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ONTAP Cloud HA at two AZ region</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Cloud-Volumes-ONTAP/ONTAP-Cloud-HA-at-two-AZ-region/m-p/124327#M35</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Mikky,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Generally you are correct.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you'd use the two nodes in form of the active node not in the mediator subnet (In case you work active-standby) - You can survive an AZ failure on the active node.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Still, if the other AZ (with the mediator) fails - You may not have the full functionality as advertised.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yaron&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2016 13:46:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Cloud-Volumes-ONTAP/ONTAP-Cloud-HA-at-two-AZ-region/m-p/124327#M35</guid>
      <dc:creator>yaronh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-18T13:46:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

