<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Risking of taking down ports in a HA Cluster environment? in General Discussion</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/General-Discussion/Risking-of-taking-down-ports-in-a-HA-Cluster-environment/m-p/163943#M1177</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We're currently experiencing a bit of trouble getting ports 0f &amp;amp; 3b online on both heads&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="NetApp_Journeyman_1-1613141800388.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.netapp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/10943i61D92FC3452566A0/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="NetApp_Journeyman_1-1613141800388.png" alt="NetApp_Journeyman_1-1613141800388.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We believe the issue might have to do with the SFP&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="NetApp_Journeyman_2-1613141839721.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.netapp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/10944i259E834BB2EED1C9/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="NetApp_Journeyman_2-1613141839721.png" alt="NetApp_Journeyman_2-1613141839721.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The SFP 0f is stuck in Connection Mode: Loop for whatever reason&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;By comparison:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="NetApp_Journeyman_3-1613141931562.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.netapp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/10945i884FF95E93D0AFD6/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="NetApp_Journeyman_3-1613141931562.png" alt="NetApp_Journeyman_3-1613141931562.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;0e appears to be working. We suspect due to having a Connection Mode: Point-to-Point&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A suggested plan would be to take some of the functional SFPs from existing port pairs and give them to 0e and 3b.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My question is, &lt;STRONG&gt;would that cause an impact?&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The current environment is in a active-active cluster environment. The ports are being connected to 2 seperate switches for redundancy.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Is there a danger to taking SFPs from working port pairs (say, 0e &amp;amp; 3c)?&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is a semi-urgent request&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 10:35:14 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>NetApp_Journeyman</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-04T10:35:14Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Risking of taking down ports in a HA Cluster environment?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/General-Discussion/Risking-of-taking-down-ports-in-a-HA-Cluster-environment/m-p/163943#M1177</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We're currently experiencing a bit of trouble getting ports 0f &amp;amp; 3b online on both heads&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="NetApp_Journeyman_1-1613141800388.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.netapp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/10943i61D92FC3452566A0/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="NetApp_Journeyman_1-1613141800388.png" alt="NetApp_Journeyman_1-1613141800388.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We believe the issue might have to do with the SFP&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="NetApp_Journeyman_2-1613141839721.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.netapp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/10944i259E834BB2EED1C9/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="NetApp_Journeyman_2-1613141839721.png" alt="NetApp_Journeyman_2-1613141839721.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The SFP 0f is stuck in Connection Mode: Loop for whatever reason&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;By comparison:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="NetApp_Journeyman_3-1613141931562.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.netapp.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/10945i884FF95E93D0AFD6/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="NetApp_Journeyman_3-1613141931562.png" alt="NetApp_Journeyman_3-1613141931562.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;0e appears to be working. We suspect due to having a Connection Mode: Point-to-Point&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A suggested plan would be to take some of the functional SFPs from existing port pairs and give them to 0e and 3b.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My question is, &lt;STRONG&gt;would that cause an impact?&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The current environment is in a active-active cluster environment. The ports are being connected to 2 seperate switches for redundancy.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Is there a danger to taking SFPs from working port pairs (say, 0e &amp;amp; 3c)?&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is a semi-urgent request&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 10:35:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/General-Discussion/Risking-of-taking-down-ports-in-a-HA-Cluster-environment/m-p/163943#M1177</guid>
      <dc:creator>NetApp_Journeyman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T10:35:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Risking of taking down ports in a HA Cluster environment?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/General-Discussion/Risking-of-taking-down-ports-in-a-HA-Cluster-environment/m-p/164003#M1181</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You have the same behavior on 4 ports? 0f and 3b on each controller? That is strange... I would not blame it on the transceiver.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;0f shows port speed as 1Gbps which is not supported by this transceiver (4/8/16). Did you check port speed set on the switches?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2021 15:34:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/General-Discussion/Risking-of-taking-down-ports-in-a-HA-Cluster-environment/m-p/164003#M1181</guid>
      <dc:creator>pedro_rocha</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-02-15T15:34:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

