<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Data assurance on the E5700 in General Discussion</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/General-Discussion/Data-assurance-on-the-E5700/m-p/142171#M128</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;What is the performance penalty for enabling data assurance on E5700? Aslo can this feature be disabled safely with production data on the volumes?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 13:24:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Bugs</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-04T13:24:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Data assurance on the E5700</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/General-Discussion/Data-assurance-on-the-E5700/m-p/142171#M128</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;What is the performance penalty for enabling data assurance on E5700? Aslo can this feature be disabled safely with production data on the volumes?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 13:24:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/General-Discussion/Data-assurance-on-the-E5700/m-p/142171#M128</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bugs</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T13:24:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

