<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Performance Difference between two netapps node in Active IQ and AutoSupport Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-and-AutoSupport-Discussions/Performance-Difference-between-two-netapps-node/m-p/131769#M1411</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Do I understand correctly that in scenario 2 and 3 you are concatenating the LUNs in the host, using Sun Volume Manager/ VXVM&amp;nbsp;or similar?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How is the host connected to the array? From your data, I see you have about 420GB of data. At 22 minutes, that works out to ~325MByte/sec&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2017 02:51:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>AlexDawson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-06-12T02:51:39Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Performance Difference between two netapps node</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-and-AutoSupport-Discussions/Performance-Difference-between-two-netapps-node/m-p/131760#M1410</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Recently we bout new all flash netapp&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;AFF8040 model.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;We are trying to have better structure for our Oracle Database in term of performance for backuppool filesystem in solaris.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;We try few structure to test the time fo the backup as below&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Day 1 : 1 Volume 1 Lun at controller B.&amp;nbsp; Backup time is 30 minutes&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Day 2 : Multiple volume with single lun at controller B. Backup time is 22 minutes&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Day 3: 3 volumes with single lun at Controller A, 3 volumes with single lun at Controller B. Backup time is still 22 minutes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please refer the attachment.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;So the question is why went we setup volume in different controller but the performance look like same as setup multiple volume in same controller?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Is that the load not distributed evenly to the both controller?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 14:59:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-and-AutoSupport-Discussions/Performance-Difference-between-two-netapps-node/m-p/131760#M1410</guid>
      <dc:creator>THARMENDRANSUKUMARAN</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T14:59:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Performance Difference between two netapps node</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-and-AutoSupport-Discussions/Performance-Difference-between-two-netapps-node/m-p/131769#M1411</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Do I understand correctly that in scenario 2 and 3 you are concatenating the LUNs in the host, using Sun Volume Manager/ VXVM&amp;nbsp;or similar?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How is the host connected to the array? From your data, I see you have about 420GB of data. At 22 minutes, that works out to ~325MByte/sec&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2017 02:51:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-and-AutoSupport-Discussions/Performance-Difference-between-two-netapps-node/m-p/131769#M1411</guid>
      <dc:creator>AlexDawson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-12T02:51:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

