<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Active IQ Unified Manager 9-7 PSL setting deletes the Volume QoS set in Active IQ and AutoSupport Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-and-AutoSupport-Discussions/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-9-7-PSL-setting-deletes-the-Volume-QoS-set/m-p/156954#M1641</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I created a custom PSL with Value settings.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Then I set that PSL to one Volume. This Volume has already its own QoS set.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;After applying the PSL and checking on the Storage, that QoS disappeared:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;the Volume was anymore associated to that QoS and the QoS as well, was not existing.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Why associating a PSL to the Volume this affects the link to the QoS and the QoS itself ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is there something predicted or is it a bug&amp;nbsp; ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;And there is a workaround in order to define and associate these PSLs without wasting the Storage configuration?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 11:05:08 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mark_display</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-04T11:05:08Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Active IQ Unified Manager 9-7 PSL setting deletes the Volume QoS set</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-and-AutoSupport-Discussions/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-9-7-PSL-setting-deletes-the-Volume-QoS-set/m-p/156954#M1641</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I created a custom PSL with Value settings.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Then I set that PSL to one Volume. This Volume has already its own QoS set.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;After applying the PSL and checking on the Storage, that QoS disappeared:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;the Volume was anymore associated to that QoS and the QoS as well, was not existing.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Why associating a PSL to the Volume this affects the link to the QoS and the QoS itself ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is there something predicted or is it a bug&amp;nbsp; ?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;And there is a workaround in order to define and associate these PSLs without wasting the Storage configuration?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thank you&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 11:05:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-and-AutoSupport-Discussions/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-9-7-PSL-setting-deletes-the-Volume-QoS-set/m-p/156954#M1641</guid>
      <dc:creator>mark_display</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T11:05:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Active IQ Unified Manager 9-7 PSL setting deletes the Volume QoS set</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-and-AutoSupport-Discussions/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-9-7-PSL-setting-deletes-the-Volume-QoS-set/m-p/156970#M1642</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This forum is for the Active IQ web portal and related AutoSupport topics...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I would post your question in the "Data Infrastructure Management SW" forum for help:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Infrastructure-Management-Software-Discussions/bd-p/oncommand-storage-management-software-discussions" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Infrastructure-Management-Software-Discussions/bd-p/oncommand-storage-management-software-discussions&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2020 19:02:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Active-IQ-and-AutoSupport-Discussions/Active-IQ-Unified-Manager-9-7-PSL-setting-deletes-the-Volume-QoS-set/m-p/156970#M1642</guid>
      <dc:creator>andris</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-06-12T19:02:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

