<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: SMVI created initiator groups in Data Protection</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SMVI-created-initiator-groups/m-p/80085#M10058</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Times-Roman; "&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P align="left"&gt;SMVI does not clean up an existing igroup when a LUN is unmounted and reuse it for future mounts.If there are no mounted backups and there are no VMFS-based virtual machine restore processes running, you can manually delete the igroup.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P align="left"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P align="left"&gt;regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P align="left"&gt;Amrita&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 07:38:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>amritad</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-10-19T07:38:21Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SMVI created initiator groups</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SMVI-created-initiator-groups/m-p/80067#M10054</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I notice that there are several new initiator groups since I installed SMVI.&amp;nbsp; Do I need these or is it safe to remove them? Any insight would be appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:23:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SMVI-created-initiator-groups/m-p/80067#M10054</guid>
      <dc:creator>ttrulis01</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:23:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SMVI created initiator groups</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SMVI-created-initiator-groups/m-p/80072#M10055</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm also very curious to know why SMVI creates these igroups, but I do know that you can safely remove them. I removed them several times without problems.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It may have something to do with clusternodes with different igroup configurations?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:22:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SMVI-created-initiator-groups/m-p/80072#M10055</guid>
      <dc:creator>bjornkoopmans</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-10-16T09:22:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SMVI created initiator groups</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SMVI-created-initiator-groups/m-p/80077#M10056</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Our controllers are clustered and we only have one inital igroup for for both of our ESX's called VMware that is mapped.&amp;nbsp; Also the two viaRPC connections made by snapdrive for the two LUNs of the exchange server are not mapped to any visible LUN.&amp;nbsp; I hope they figure out why SMVI does that.&amp;nbsp; Thanks for response.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 13:23:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SMVI-created-initiator-groups/m-p/80077#M10056</guid>
      <dc:creator>ttrulis01</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-10-16T13:23:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SMVI created initiator groups</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SMVI-created-initiator-groups/m-p/80080#M10057</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hmm....are you doing "test restore" by any chance?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm wondering if it's tied to lun cloning during the restore process.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 01:21:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SMVI-created-initiator-groups/m-p/80080#M10057</guid>
      <dc:creator>amiller_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-10-17T01:21:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SMVI created initiator groups</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SMVI-created-initiator-groups/m-p/80085#M10058</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Times-Roman; "&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P align="left"&gt;SMVI does not clean up an existing igroup when a LUN is unmounted and reuse it for future mounts.If there are no mounted backups and there are no VMFS-based virtual machine restore processes running, you can manually delete the igroup.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P align="left"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P align="left"&gt;regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P align="left"&gt;Amrita&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 07:38:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SMVI-created-initiator-groups/m-p/80085#M10058</guid>
      <dc:creator>amritad</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-10-19T07:38:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

