<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: So what is there in the new world compared to the old NearStore? in Data Protection</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/So-what-is-there-in-the-new-world-compared-to-the-old-NearStore/m-p/128748#M11260</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please refer&amp;nbsp;Maximum concurrent transfers for clustered confingurations in the link below:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://library.netapp.com/ecmdocs/ECMP1129530/html/index.html" target="_blank"&gt;https://library.netapp.com/ecmdocs/ECMP1129530/html/index.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2017 03:24:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Sahana</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-03-07T03:24:58Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>So what is there in the new world compared to the old NearStore?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/So-what-is-there-in-the-new-world-compared-to-the-old-NearStore/m-p/128642#M11259</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am thinking of building a new and third cluster on a third location for backups only. Previously we had NearStore and R200's to accept lots of concurrent transfers.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a way to turn a cDOT cluster into something similar? As in a backup only cluster accepting lots of concurrent transfers say 100+ and storing them om NL-SAS drives.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 15:23:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/So-what-is-there-in-the-new-world-compared-to-the-old-NearStore/m-p/128642#M11259</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kishanb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T15:23:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: So what is there in the new world compared to the old NearStore?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/So-what-is-there-in-the-new-world-compared-to-the-old-NearStore/m-p/128748#M11260</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please refer&amp;nbsp;Maximum concurrent transfers for clustered confingurations in the link below:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://library.netapp.com/ecmdocs/ECMP1129530/html/index.html" target="_blank"&gt;https://library.netapp.com/ecmdocs/ECMP1129530/html/index.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2017 03:24:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/So-what-is-there-in-the-new-world-compared-to-the-old-NearStore/m-p/128748#M11260</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sahana</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-07T03:24:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: So what is there in the new world compared to the old NearStore?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/So-what-is-there-in-the-new-world-compared-to-the-old-NearStore/m-p/129989#M11310</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;with cluster mode we don't have nearstore feature anymore.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Maximum number of concurrent transfers is related to platform model&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Most of platform supports at least 100 simultaneous transfers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However I would recommend you to contact your account team for better clarifying that&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2017 11:01:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/So-what-is-there-in-the-new-world-compared-to-the-old-NearStore/m-p/129989#M11310</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sergey_Osipov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-11T11:01:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

