<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: VSC with SVM-DR / Snapshot cannot age due &amp;quot;database record owner&amp;quot; in Data Protection</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/VSC-with-SVM-DR-Snapshot-cannot-age-due-quot-database-record-owner-quot/m-p/139620#M11867</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hey Gidi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;we opened a case and will update the thread then the issue is solved.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Pat&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2018 13:25:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>pg2aude</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-04-16T13:25:07Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>VSC with SVM-DR / Snapshot cannot age due "database record owner"</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/VSC-with-SVM-DR-Snapshot-cannot-age-due-quot-database-record-owner-quot/m-p/139469#M11861</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hey folks,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;we have some troubles with Snapshots of VM-Datastore via VSC in combination with SVM-DR relationship of the NFS-Datastore.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Snapshots cannot be deleted as configured in the vsc backup job because some snapshots have an record-owner entry.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;CL1::*&amp;gt; snapshot show -volume ESXxx -fields owners,busy,record-owner,create-time
vserver volume      snapshot                         create-time              busy  owners record-owner
------- ----------- -------------------------------- ------------------------ ----- ------ ----------------------------------------------------------------------
NFS1 ESXxx smvi__ESXxx_20180124213000 Wed Jan 24 21:43:27 2018 false -      snapmirrorDP.7eb76d1189f2e6119fd100a098c68937_2149105432.nonSMDstOwned
NFS1 ESXxx smvi__ESXxx_20180201213000 Thu Feb 01 21:43:06 2018 false -      snapmirrorDP.7eb76d1189f2e6119fd100a098c68937_2149105432.nonSMDstOwned
NFS1 ESXxx smvi__ESXxx_20180214213000 Wed Feb 14 21:43:06 2018 false -      snapmirrorDP.7eb76d1189f2e6119fd100a098c68937_2149105432.nonSMDstOwned
NFS1 ESXxx smvi__ESXxx_20180301213001 Thu Mar 01 21:43:16 2018 false -      -
[...]
NFS1 ESXxx smvi__ESXxx_20180329213001 Thu Mar 29 21:41:46 2018 false -      -
NFS1 ESXxx smvi__ESXxx_20180330213000 Fri Mar 30 21:42:16 2018 false -      snapmirrorDP.7eb76d1189f2e6119fd100a098c68937_2149105432.nonSMDstOwned
NFS1 ESXxx smvi__ESXxx_20180402213000 Mon Apr 02 21:41:26 2018 false -      -
NFS1 ESXxx smvi__ESXxx_20180403213001 Tue Apr 03 21:42:16 2018 false -      -
NFS1 ESXxx smvi__ESXxx_20180404213000 Wed Apr 04 21:53:26 2018 false -      snapmirrorDP.7eb76d1189f2e6119fd100a098c68937_2149105432.nonSMDstOwned
NFS1 ESXxx smvi__ESXxx_20180405213000 Thu Apr 05 21:42:06 2018 false -      -
NFS1 ESXxx smvi__ESXxx_20180406213000 Fri Apr 06 21:42:06 2018 false -      -
NFS1 ESXxx smvi__ESXxx_recent         Mon Apr 09 21:42:54 2018 false -      -
NFS1 ESXxx vserverdr.0.116db77e-f289-11e6-9fd1-00a098c68937.2018-04-10_080500
                                                     Tue Apr 10 08:05:02 2018 false -      VserverDR,snapmirrorDP.7eb76d1189f2e6119fd100a098c68937_2149105432.base
32 entries were displayed.

CL1::*&amp;gt; snapshot show -volume ESXxx -snapshot smvi__ESXxx_20180124213000 -instance

                              Vserver: NFS1
                               Volume: ESXxx
                             Snapshot: smvi__ESXxx_20180124213000
                 Snapshot Data Set ID: 914828035119
          Snapshot Master Data Set ID: 916977139480
                        Creation Time: Wed Jan 24 21:43:27 2018
                        Snapshot Busy: false
                       List of Owners: -
                        Snapshot Size: 319.6GB
           Percentage of Total Blocks: 3%
            Percentage of Used Blocks: 5%
              Consistency Point Count: 3352386
                              Comment: -
                  File System Version: 9.0
             File System Block Format: 64-bit
                     Physical Snap ID: 213
                      Logical Snap ID: 213
                Database Record Owner: snapmirrorDP.7eb76d1189f2e6119fd100a098c68937_2149105432.nonSMDstOwned
                        Snapshot Tags: VOPL_owner_snapmirrorDP.
                                       7eb76d1189f2e6119fd100a098c68937_
                                       2149105432.nonSMDstOwned=snapmirror
                        Instance UUID: b3fea069-1938-4c7f-8ef2-670eb364894f
                         Version UUID: b3fea069-1938-4c7f-8ef2-670eb364894f
                      7-Mode Snapshot: false
      Label for SnapMirror Operations: -
                       Snapshot State: -
                 Constituent Snapshot: false
                                 Node: CL1_N1
               AFS Size from Snapshot: 4.86TB
    Compression Savings from Snapshot: 1.78TB
          Dedup Savings from Snapshot: 2.94TB
       VBN Zero Savings from Snapshot: 199.4GB
             Snapshot Inofile Version: 4
                          Expiry Time: -
                     Compression Type: adaptive
                 SnapLock Expiry Time: -&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Due to this entry, we cannot delete the snapshot in VSC, SystemManager and CLI (*force should work, but the vsc will not know about the deletion).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We&amp;nbsp;are looking for a way to delete the record-owner entry or to prevent the vm backup process (VSC+SVM-DR) to create snapshots with stuck Database record owner.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is there anyone out there, who&amp;nbsp;already had such an behaviour? And maybe an solution?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks for any hints,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;regards,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Pat&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 13:49:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/VSC-with-SVM-DR-Snapshot-cannot-age-due-quot-database-record-owner-quot/m-p/139469#M11861</guid>
      <dc:creator>pg2aude</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T13:49:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VSC with SVM-DR / Snapshot cannot age due "database record owner"</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/VSC-with-SVM-DR-Snapshot-cannot-age-due-quot-database-record-owner-quot/m-p/139618#M11866</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Pat&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;i suggest you open a case with NetApp to try and find why the&amp;nbsp;snapshot got stuck.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;they&amp;nbsp;should&amp;nbsp;easily search in the syslog and snapmirorr.log for the snapshot name and&amp;nbsp;figure out their history (you can also do it yourself in Active IQ. but they can maybe&amp;nbsp;correlate it to a bug based on internal database faster).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;once it found they could give you a full action plan for recovery. including when to force the&amp;nbsp;deletions and what&amp;nbsp;should be done before&amp;nbsp; / after.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Gidi&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2018 13:08:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/VSC-with-SVM-DR-Snapshot-cannot-age-due-quot-database-record-owner-quot/m-p/139618#M11866</guid>
      <dc:creator>GidonMarcus</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-16T13:08:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VSC with SVM-DR / Snapshot cannot age due "database record owner"</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/VSC-with-SVM-DR-Snapshot-cannot-age-due-quot-database-record-owner-quot/m-p/139620#M11867</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hey Gidi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;we opened a case and will update the thread then the issue is solved.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Pat&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2018 13:25:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/VSC-with-SVM-DR-Snapshot-cannot-age-due-quot-database-record-owner-quot/m-p/139620#M11867</guid>
      <dc:creator>pg2aude</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-16T13:25:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: VSC with SVM-DR / Snapshot cannot age due "database record owner"</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/VSC-with-SVM-DR-Snapshot-cannot-age-due-quot-database-record-owner-quot/m-p/139900#M11878</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;if you check the IMT you will find out that the combination SVM-DR and VSC is not Supportet!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;regards Piero&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2018 09:41:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/VSC-with-SVM-DR-Snapshot-cannot-age-due-quot-database-record-owner-quot/m-p/139900#M11878</guid>
      <dc:creator>Giagnorio</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-27T09:41:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

