<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic SnapCenter file-based backup for SAP HANA MDC with multiple tenants in Data Protection</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SnapCenter-file-based-backup-for-SAP-HANA-MDC-with-multiple-tenants/m-p/145373#M12228</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As "&lt;STRONG&gt;Snapshot&lt;/STRONG&gt; backup of HANA 2.x MDC with multiple tenant" is not supported by SAP now, I'd like to know if&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;at least the "&lt;STRONG&gt;file-based&lt;/STRONG&gt; backup of&amp;nbsp;HANA &lt;STRONG&gt;MDC with multiple tenants&lt;/STRONG&gt;" is possible with SnapCenter....&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 13:01:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Spaceball</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-04T13:01:10Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SnapCenter file-based backup for SAP HANA MDC with multiple tenants</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SnapCenter-file-based-backup-for-SAP-HANA-MDC-with-multiple-tenants/m-p/145373#M12228</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As "&lt;STRONG&gt;Snapshot&lt;/STRONG&gt; backup of HANA 2.x MDC with multiple tenant" is not supported by SAP now, I'd like to know if&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;at least the "&lt;STRONG&gt;file-based&lt;/STRONG&gt; backup of&amp;nbsp;HANA &lt;STRONG&gt;MDC with multiple tenants&lt;/STRONG&gt;" is possible with SnapCenter....&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 13:01:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SnapCenter-file-based-backup-for-SAP-HANA-MDC-with-multiple-tenants/m-p/145373#M12228</guid>
      <dc:creator>Spaceball</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T13:01:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SnapCenter file-based backup for SAP HANA MDC with multiple tenants</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SnapCenter-file-based-backup-for-SAP-HANA-MDC-with-multiple-tenants/m-p/145396#M12231</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;No, SnapCenter can't execute file-based backups&amp;nbsp; for SAP HANA MDC multiple tenant systems.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2018 13:39:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SnapCenter-file-based-backup-for-SAP-HANA-MDC-with-multiple-tenants/m-p/145396#M12231</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nils_Bauer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-14T13:39:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SnapCenter file-based backup for SAP HANA MDC with multiple tenants</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SnapCenter-file-based-backup-for-SAP-HANA-MDC-with-multiple-tenants/m-p/145401#M12232</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;first, I have to correct myselfe, I shoud have asked if SnapCenter can do file-based backups of HANA 1.0 MDC Multitenant.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I figured out that there is a difference at the sqlcli backup command string formed by snapcenter, depending on what type of hana resorce is created at SnapCenter Resource configuration:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;chosing single container: the backup command looks like&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;backup data using file ('SnapCenter_hostname_hana_sid_hostname_date_time') asynchronous&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;chosing multitenant database container: it looks like&lt;BR /&gt;BACKUP DATA FOR SYSTEMDB USING FILE ('SC_SnapCenter_hostname_hana_sid_tenant_hostname_date_time') ASYNCHRONOUS &lt;STRONG&gt;COMMENT 'hostname_hana_sid_tenant_hostname_date_time'&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;the comment statement is not supported on hana 1.0, so the file-backup failed.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;the same string executed in hana sqlcli (hana 2.0 MDC single tenant) works (also with the comment statement.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I still have some tests outstanding with hana 2.0 MDC multitenant.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So, as it looks now: it seems to be possible to me hat SnapCenter based fiel-backup of hana 2.0 mdc, multitenant will work.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'll keep you updated.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2018 14:48:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SnapCenter-file-based-backup-for-SAP-HANA-MDC-with-multiple-tenants/m-p/145401#M12232</guid>
      <dc:creator>Spaceball</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-14T14:48:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SnapCenter file-based backup for SAP HANA MDC with multiple tenants</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SnapCenter-file-based-backup-for-SAP-HANA-MDC-with-multiple-tenants/m-p/145402#M12233</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;For a file-based backup of a HANA single container, SnapCenter is executing a single SQL backup statement.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- Backup data using file ...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;For a file-based backup of a HANA MDC single tenant system SnapCenter executes the backup of the SystemDB as well as the backup of the tenant DB using two SQL commands.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- Backup data for systemdb ...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;- Backup data for &amp;lt;tenant name&amp;gt; ...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;For a file-based backup of an MDC multiple tenant system, SnapCenter would need to execute the backup of the SystemDB as well as a&amp;nbsp; backup for each tenant. This is not implemented in SnapCenter and therefore won't work.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2018 15:01:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SnapCenter-file-based-backup-for-SAP-HANA-MDC-with-multiple-tenants/m-p/145402#M12233</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nils_Bauer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-14T15:01:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

