<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Client force SMB encryption in Data Protection</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/Client-force-SMB-encryption/m-p/155328#M12789</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I want to backup SMB shares using a client. Now, this client lives in a different domain and it would be preferred if the data is encrypted.&amp;nbsp; However, other traffic to this server need not be encrypted. So, is there a way to selectively encrypt the data for a share? Can the client force server to encrypt the data.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 11:14:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ntapAdminUser</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-04T11:14:20Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Client force SMB encryption</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/Client-force-SMB-encryption/m-p/155328#M12789</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I want to backup SMB shares using a client. Now, this client lives in a different domain and it would be preferred if the data is encrypted.&amp;nbsp; However, other traffic to this server need not be encrypted. So, is there a way to selectively encrypt the data for a share? Can the client force server to encrypt the data.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 11:14:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/Client-force-SMB-encryption/m-p/155328#M12789</guid>
      <dc:creator>ntapAdminUser</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T11:14:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Client force SMB encryption</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/Client-force-SMB-encryption/m-p/155337#M12790</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;SMB is a client/server Model, so I don't think client can force it. It's the SMB Server setting that can force encryption and the client must support it.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Encryption is provided by the 'Protocol/SMB3.0' itself (@Session/share level), It can either be for all the shares or at individual share. Therefore, whatever Ontap version supports SMB3.0 dialect, you should be able to enable it.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;By default, it is disabled (b'cos of possible performance impact).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;ONTAP (SMB Server): You can configure the desired SMB encryption setting on a share-by-share basis through a share property setting or at SVM level for all the shares.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;SMB Client: To create an encrypted SMB session, the SMB client must support SMB encryption. Windows clients starting with Windows Server 2012 and Windows 8 support SMB encryption. SMB clients that do not support encryption cannot connect to a SMB server or share that requires encryption.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I think it's worth testing to see if there is any serge in CPU at client or storage side due to it, I haven't used it so I can't share first hand experience with you. Following section do talk about it:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;When SMB sessions use SMB encryption, all SMB communications to and from Windows clients experience a performance impact, which affects both the clients and the server.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Performance impact of SMB encryption:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A href="https://docs.netapp.com/ontap-9/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.netapp.doc.cdot-famg-cifs%2FGUID-EF158266-85EE-4648-8D0F-6F80F0E13DCA.html" target="_blank"&gt;https://docs.netapp.com/ontap-9/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.netapp.doc.cdot-famg-cifs%2FGUID-EF158266-85EE-4648-8D0F-6F80F0E13DCA.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;SMB is well documented in Microsoft docs as well, so testing is worth it.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2020 10:08:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/Client-force-SMB-encryption/m-p/155337#M12790</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ontapforrum</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-06T10:08:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Client force SMB encryption</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/Client-force-SMB-encryption/m-p/155351#M12792</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.netapp.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/73493"&gt;@Ontapforrum&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp; Thanks for the info. Just want to confirm that we are on the same page:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The command to enable/disable encryption is:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;vserver cifs security modify -vserver&amp;nbsp;&lt;VAR class="keyword varname"&gt;vserver_name&lt;/VAR&gt;&amp;nbsp;-is-smb-encryption-required true/false&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Let's say I set it to false (i.e disable encryption for a vserver). If a client wants to negotiate encryption. Will the client be able to negotiate with the server to encrypt the traffic between them?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The idea is that only one client to the SMB server needs encrypted data. Others clients do not need data to be encrypted. Is this possible?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2020 17:44:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/Client-force-SMB-encryption/m-p/155351#M12792</guid>
      <dc:creator>ntapAdminUser</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-06T17:44:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

