<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Snapcenter vs SMO Feature Parity Issues in Data Protection</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/Snapcenter-vs-SMO-Feature-Parity-Issues/m-p/163014#M13118</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;We have been evaluating SC 4.4 as we need to move away from SMO for Oracle 19c support. We are finding a lot of limitation on the SC UI around admin aspects that were easy in SMO. Some examples:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Clone &lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;hierarchy&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; not present in SC&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;UI does not show a list of backups for all resources&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Backup to clone hierarchy would be better suited to a tree view&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Backups/Clones cannot have an arbitrary name specified at creation&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Limited tagging of entities to add metadat for admins/dev teams&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Some panes show loading when creating clones etc. UI should be more responsive&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;In SMO we could provide a simply XML file that contyained all the SGA setup etc. for a clone. Nothing in SC UI for this. Need to do it manually each time.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Perhaps I am not using the product as it is intended but these have proved very frustrating.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 10:38:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>darraghos</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-04T10:38:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Snapcenter vs SMO Feature Parity Issues</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/Snapcenter-vs-SMO-Feature-Parity-Issues/m-p/163014#M13118</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We have been evaluating SC 4.4 as we need to move away from SMO for Oracle 19c support. We are finding a lot of limitation on the SC UI around admin aspects that were easy in SMO. Some examples:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;OL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Clone &lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;hierarchy&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt; not present in SC&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;UI does not show a list of backups for all resources&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Backup to clone hierarchy would be better suited to a tree view&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Backups/Clones cannot have an arbitrary name specified at creation&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Limited tagging of entities to add metadat for admins/dev teams&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Some panes show loading when creating clones etc. UI should be more responsive&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;In SMO we could provide a simply XML file that contyained all the SGA setup etc. for a clone. Nothing in SC UI for this. Need to do it manually each time.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Perhaps I am not using the product as it is intended but these have proved very frustrating.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2025 10:38:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/Snapcenter-vs-SMO-Feature-Parity-Issues/m-p/163014#M13118</guid>
      <dc:creator>darraghos</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-04T10:38:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

