<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Multiple clones from same DB volumes in Data Protection</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/Multiple-clones-from-same-DB-volumes/m-p/19637#M2996</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yep if you just rename without the "cl_" it will no longer be managed by SC so SC wont delete it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you do clone split and dont rename volume I believe SC might delete it but not 100% sure. If it is easy I would test it to be sure.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Generally renaming volume before doing split would be my recommendation, since at that point it should no longer be managed by SC.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Keith&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 21:31:09 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ktenzer</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-09-26T21:31:09Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Multiple clones from same DB volumes</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/Multiple-clones-from-same-DB-volumes/m-p/19625#M2993</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a SnapCreator clone of an Informix production DB containing 5 volumes that gets refreshed every day at 4:30am and mounted up to a new server called Pegasus. This has been working fine. This pasted weekend I wanted to use SnapCreator to clone the same Production Informix DB to another server Asteroid. So I setup my new policy and pointed it to the new server Asteroid. When I ran the SnapCreator process to my surpise it removed the clone that I had to the original server Pegasus. Has anyone else ran into an issue cloning 1 DB to multiple servers using SnapCreator. Is there a setting that I am missing?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:45:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/Multiple-clones-from-same-DB-volumes/m-p/19625#M2993</guid>
      <dc:creator>cferbrache</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:45:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Multiple clones from same DB volumes</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/Multiple-clones-from-same-DB-volumes/m-p/19629#M2994</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Snap Creator clone policy NUM_CLONES is per volume so if NUM_CLONES=5 then SC will allow 5 clones for volumes listed in config. If you create two configs that number is still 5 and each time either config runs a clone will be deleted if you have more than 5 clones.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We dont support cloning to multiple systems at this time since we cant control when clones will be deleted if multiple configs are involved.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Keith&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 21:15:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/Multiple-clones-from-same-DB-volumes/m-p/19629#M2994</guid>
      <dc:creator>ktenzer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-09-26T21:15:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Multiple clones from same DB volumes</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/Multiple-clones-from-same-DB-volumes/m-p/19633#M2995</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Seems like being able to name the clone a specific name would resolve the issue of them getting removed. I was able to use SnapCreator to do the second clone by changing the NUM_CLONES parameter I then split the clone and renamed the clone once it was complete so that SnapCreator would not remove it. Do you know what would happen if I don't split the clone and just rename it? Would SnapCreator still be able to delete since it is not split?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 21:23:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/Multiple-clones-from-same-DB-volumes/m-p/19633#M2995</guid>
      <dc:creator>cferbrache</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-09-26T21:23:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Multiple clones from same DB volumes</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/Multiple-clones-from-same-DB-volumes/m-p/19637#M2996</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yep if you just rename without the "cl_" it will no longer be managed by SC so SC wont delete it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you do clone split and dont rename volume I believe SC might delete it but not 100% sure. If it is easy I would test it to be sure.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Generally renaming volume before doing split would be my recommendation, since at that point it should no longer be managed by SC.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Keith&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 21:31:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/Multiple-clones-from-same-DB-volumes/m-p/19637#M2996</guid>
      <dc:creator>ktenzer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-09-26T21:31:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Multiple clones from same DB volumes</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/Multiple-clones-from-same-DB-volumes/m-p/19646#M2997</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; Do you know if this will be added at a later time? I need to do 3 clones from the same DB and now will not be able to automate this using SnapCreator.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 21:33:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/Multiple-clones-from-same-DB-volumes/m-p/19646#M2997</guid>
      <dc:creator>cferbrache</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-09-26T21:33:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Multiple clones from same DB volumes</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/Multiple-clones-from-same-DB-volumes/m-p/19650#M2998</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;So you need 3 sets of clones? And for them to be deleted in by separate configs?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We can certainly add this as feature request for future, shouldnt be too difficult&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Keith&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 21:40:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/Multiple-clones-from-same-DB-volumes/m-p/19650#M2998</guid>
      <dc:creator>ktenzer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-09-26T21:40:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Multiple clones from same DB volumes</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/Multiple-clones-from-same-DB-volumes/m-p/19655#M2999</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; Yes, that is correct.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 21:42:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/Multiple-clones-from-same-DB-volumes/m-p/19655#M2999</guid>
      <dc:creator>cferbrache</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-09-26T21:42:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Multiple clones from same DB volumes</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/Multiple-clones-from-same-DB-volumes/m-p/19660#M3000</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ok I will get with the devs. I think simply changing clone naming convention to cl_&amp;lt;config&amp;gt;_&amp;lt;volume&amp;gt;_&amp;lt;timestamp&amp;gt; would allow this to work.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Keith&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 21:53:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/Multiple-clones-from-same-DB-volumes/m-p/19660#M3000</guid>
      <dc:creator>ktenzer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-09-26T21:53:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple clones from same DB volumes</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/Multiple-clones-from-same-DB-volumes/m-p/19667#M3001</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Has this been fixed in the new release?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2012 19:44:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/Multiple-clones-from-same-DB-volumes/m-p/19667#M3001</guid>
      <dc:creator>cferbrache</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-04-12T19:44:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple clones from same DB volumes</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/Multiple-clones-from-same-DB-volumes/m-p/19671#M3002</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yep SC 3.5 supports this. We changed the naming convention for clones to allow it to be more flexible. Just a warning done have a "-" in your config name, as that isnt allowed in a clone name and we now use config name as part of clone name.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Keith&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 09:26:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/Multiple-clones-from-same-DB-volumes/m-p/19671#M3002</guid>
      <dc:creator>ktenzer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-04-13T09:26:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple clones from same DB volumes</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/Multiple-clones-from-same-DB-volumes/m-p/19679#M3003</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is an underscore ok in the name?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 20:09:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/Multiple-clones-from-same-DB-volumes/m-p/19679#M3003</guid>
      <dc:creator>cferbrache</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-04-13T20:09:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

