<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: SnapManager - Delay in retrieving database information in Data Protection</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SnapManager-Delay-in-retrieving-database-information/m-p/98013#M4704</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the good info, Andy. &amp;nbsp;I was coming from SnapDrive 6.4.2 and SMSQL 5.2, so this is our first jump into SMSQL 6.x.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Your suggestion to go through support (in addition to the information you've provided) seems like a logical step to try to reign this in, so I will likely try that route.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To answer your other questions:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;We do use VSC for VM/Datastore backups, but not during the timing in question, so I don't think that would be of impact here.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;It's only the SMSQL backups that are occuring on the server at this time from everything I can tell. &amp;nbsp;I took a look through the SQL Agent jobs on the box and didn't see anything that looked like it'd be getting in the way. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;We're utilizing SnapMirror replication upon SMSQL job completion.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hand't realized the lack of testing between SnapDrive 6.5 and vSphere 5.5. &amp;nbsp;I can't move to SDW 7.0 as of yet, as I believe the matrix says I need to be on Data ONTAP 8.2 for this to be supported (we're currently on 8.1.2).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks again for your feedback on this!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2014 17:04:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>stephenyursik</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-12-03T17:04:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SnapManager - Delay in retrieving database information</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SnapManager-Delay-in-retrieving-database-information/m-p/97954#M4702</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I recently upgraded SnapDrive/SnapManager on a Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1 host to SnapDrive 6.5 and SnapManager 6.0.1.1431. &amp;nbsp;At the time I upgraded, supposedly there were no other changes being made to the database server. &amp;nbsp;The server is a VMware virtual machine on vSphere 5.5 and the NetApp solution is a 3220 HA pair running ONTAP 8.1.2 7-Mode. &amp;nbsp;The server is running SQL Server 2008 R2 SP2. &amp;nbsp;I believe this configuration is supported according to the interop matrix.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Prior to updating this software, the hourly full SMSQL backups we were taking would take 3-5 minutes to complete. &amp;nbsp;Post upgrade, I'm seeing different behavior (most of the time, at least). &amp;nbsp;The syntax of my job is as shown below; I had to change it from what it was prior to the upgrade to get it to correctly pick up both SQL instances. &amp;nbsp;From reading the documentation, it seems that the "new-backup -srv&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;'&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;SERVERNAME&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;' -d 'SERVERNAME&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;' etc,etc,etc"&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;should&lt;/EM&gt; back up all instances on the server. &amp;nbsp;This was not the case post-upgrade, and only the default instance was getting backed up. &amp;nbsp;So, I changed it to what is shown below.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;NEW JOB SYNTAX:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;new-backup &amp;nbsp;–svr 'SERVERNAME' -d 'SERVERNAME', '0', 'SERVERNAME\NAMEDINSTANCE', '0' &amp;nbsp;-RetainBackupDays &amp;nbsp;10 -RetainShareBackupDays &amp;nbsp;0 -cpylgbkshare NOTHING_TOSHARE -lb -bksif -RetainSnapofSnapInfoDays 10 -rudays 10 -updmir &amp;nbsp;–mgmt standard&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #999999;"&gt;Old job syntax (pre software upgarde) for comparison - this job ran fine under the old software versions:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #999999;"&gt;new-backup &amp;nbsp;–svr 'SERVERNAME' &amp;nbsp;-RetainBackupDays &amp;nbsp;10 -lb -bksif -RetainSnapofSnapInfoDays 10 -rudays 10 -updmir –mgmt standard&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This new syntax seems to work and backs up the databases successfully. &amp;nbsp;However, the time that the job takes to complete (backing up the same databases as with the old SnapDrive/SnapManager software versions) has increased significantly, but not every time it is run.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now, when I run SMSQL backups called via a scheduled task, jobs that run between 7am and 1 am complete in 11-12 minutes. &amp;nbsp;Jobs that run between 2 am and 6 am run in 2-3 minutes. &amp;nbsp;Yes, certainly you'd be right to point out that when the job runs quickly, it is during off-peak hours. &amp;nbsp;However, there's nothing I'm aware of that is going on between 10 pm and 1 am (just for a simple example) that should be hitting the server any harder than between 2 am and 6 am. &amp;nbsp;And again, I never once saw this issue prior to upgrading the SnapDrive/SnapManager packages.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This excess time the jobs take seems to be due to SMSQL not retrieving the SQL Server database information successfully. &amp;nbsp;When the jobs take longer to run, I see the event timeline display similar to the following:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;10:00:01 am - Event 308 logged - "SnapManager for SQL Server per-server &amp;nbsp;license is licensed on server SERVERNAME"&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;10:10:22 am (This is the next SMSQL event logged) - Event 368 logged - "SQL Server database information was retrieved successfully."&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;From that point on things start moving in the exected time frame&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;When the jobs run as I would have initially expcected (from 2-6 am) I see that the database information is retrieved in a much more timely manner:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;6:00:03 am -&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;Event 308 logged - "SnapManager for SQL Server per-server &amp;nbsp;license is licensed on server SERVERNAME"&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;6:00:21 am&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;(This is the next SMSQL event logged) - Event 368 logged - "&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;SQL Server database information was retrieved successfully.&lt;/SPAN&gt;"&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;The job then completes within a couple of minutes.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm trying to figure out why I'm getting this 10 minute delay on the backups between 7 am and 1 am. &amp;nbsp;Someone from our&amp;nbsp;DBA group is also seeing that the query/(ies) coming from SMSQL&amp;nbsp;on the delayed jobs seem to hit the server harder during this time frame, but they haven't been able to pinpoint anything other than to say the queries are taking a long time to complete. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Due to the nature/source of this issue, other SMSQL tasks are impacted as well (for example, database cloning [as one might expect] since we seem to be having issues retrieving the databases in a timely manner).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anyone have any ideas&amp;nbsp;as how I might go about further troubleshooting this to get the time it takes to retrieve the SQL server database information back to a reasonable range so that I don't hit a 10 minute delay on any SMSQL task I run between the hours of 7 am and 1 am? &amp;nbsp;Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated, thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 05:23:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SnapManager-Delay-in-retrieving-database-information/m-p/97954#M4702</guid>
      <dc:creator>stephenyursik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T05:23:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SnapManager - Delay in retrieving database information</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SnapManager-Delay-in-retrieving-database-information/m-p/97968#M4703</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;What version of SDW and SMSQL did you upgrade from?&amp;nbsp; Starting in SMSQL 6.x, the SQL Management Object (SMO) API framework was utilized, as opposed to the older Data management Object (DMO) API.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, in SMSQL 6.x, you can force the application to use the older DMO libraries to see if using the new libraries is causing a problem.&amp;nbsp; If this is a route you would like to explore, I would suggest contacting NetApp Support for a case creation, as it does require modifying the registry.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Additionally, I would&amp;nbsp; be curious as to what else is occurring on the storage controller during that time.&amp;nbsp; You mentioned this is a virtual machine running on 5.5.&amp;nbsp; Are you also utilizing NetApp's Virtual Storage Console for virtual machine/datastore backups?&amp;nbsp; If so, are those backups running during the 10pm to 1am timeframe?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Lastly, are any other backups hitting this server during this timeframe? Other SQL backups, Exchange backups, Oracle backups, etc.? Are you utilizing SnapMirror or SnapVault with replication running during this time?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In terms of versioning, SnapDrive 6.5 has not been tested with vSphere 5.5.&amp;nbsp; vSphere 5.5 and ESXi 5.5 have been verified with SDW 7.0 and higher.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There are a number of reasons why you could be experiencing slowdown.&amp;nbsp; The more information we have to work with, the better we can determine where the probable issue resides.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2014 21:20:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SnapManager-Delay-in-retrieving-database-information/m-p/97968#M4703</guid>
      <dc:creator>AndyD</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-12-02T21:20:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SnapManager - Delay in retrieving database information</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SnapManager-Delay-in-retrieving-database-information/m-p/98013#M4704</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the good info, Andy. &amp;nbsp;I was coming from SnapDrive 6.4.2 and SMSQL 5.2, so this is our first jump into SMSQL 6.x.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Your suggestion to go through support (in addition to the information you've provided) seems like a logical step to try to reign this in, so I will likely try that route.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To answer your other questions:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;We do use VSC for VM/Datastore backups, but not during the timing in question, so I don't think that would be of impact here.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;It's only the SMSQL backups that are occuring on the server at this time from everything I can tell. &amp;nbsp;I took a look through the SQL Agent jobs on the box and didn't see anything that looked like it'd be getting in the way. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;We're utilizing SnapMirror replication upon SMSQL job completion.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hand't realized the lack of testing between SnapDrive 6.5 and vSphere 5.5. &amp;nbsp;I can't move to SDW 7.0 as of yet, as I believe the matrix says I need to be on Data ONTAP 8.2 for this to be supported (we're currently on 8.1.2).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks again for your feedback on this!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2014 17:04:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SnapManager-Delay-in-retrieving-database-information/m-p/98013#M4704</guid>
      <dc:creator>stephenyursik</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-12-03T17:04:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

