<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: rebalance over-loaded luns between aggregates in Data Protection</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/rebalance-over-loaded-luns-between-aggregates/m-p/502#M5398</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, whatever method you chose it will be disruptive in your configuration. What is the best really depends on how much downtime you can afford, which licenses you have etc.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 03:08:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>aborzenkov</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-09-30T03:08:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>rebalance over-loaded luns between aggregates</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/rebalance-over-loaded-luns-between-aggregates/m-p/498#M5397</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a few aggrs, one with only one volume and a number of luns is extremely over load, and the other aggrs are not so much loaded. I wanted to move some of luns from the busy aggr to the other. What is the best steps/commands to do that? Does that require luns to be disruppted? I don't have two many space left, so, don't have too much free room to play. Thanks for your advices!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 05:53:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/rebalance-over-loaded-luns-between-aggregates/m-p/498#M5397</guid>
      <dc:creator>netappmagic</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T05:53:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: rebalance over-loaded luns between aggregates</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/rebalance-over-loaded-luns-between-aggregates/m-p/502#M5398</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, whatever method you chose it will be disruptive in your configuration. What is the best really depends on how much downtime you can afford, which licenses you have etc.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 03:08:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/rebalance-over-loaded-luns-between-aggregates/m-p/502#M5398</guid>
      <dc:creator>aborzenkov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-09-30T03:08:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: rebalance over-loaded luns between aggregates</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/rebalance-over-loaded-luns-between-aggregates/m-p/504#M5399</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have snampirror license, that is someting I think it might be related. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Would you please list a few methonds(steps/commands), no&amp;nbsp; matter how long the downtime would be if it could not avoided?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 10:51:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/rebalance-over-loaded-luns-between-aggregates/m-p/504#M5399</guid>
      <dc:creator>netappmagic</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-09-30T10:51:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: rebalance over-loaded luns between aggregates</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/rebalance-over-loaded-luns-between-aggregates/m-p/509#M5400</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The first obvious one (and requires no licenses) - stop access to LUN, used ndmpcopy to copy it to another volume, update lun mapping.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If LUNs are in qtrees, you can use QSM to migrate every qtree to different volume.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 10:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/rebalance-over-loaded-luns-between-aggregates/m-p/509#M5400</guid>
      <dc:creator>aborzenkov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-09-30T10:55:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: rebalance over-loaded luns between aggregates</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/rebalance-over-loaded-luns-between-aggregates/m-p/514#M5401</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;vol move&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;will do the trick...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 10:59:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/rebalance-over-loaded-luns-between-aggregates/m-p/514#M5401</guid>
      <dc:creator>peter_lehmann</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-09-30T10:59:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: rebalance over-loaded luns between aggregates</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/rebalance-over-loaded-luns-between-aggregates/m-p/518#M5402</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;PRE __jive_macro_name="quote" class="jive_text_macro jive_macro_quote" modifiedtitle="true"&gt;&lt;P&gt;vol move&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;To quote original message:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE __jive_macro_name="quote" class="jive_text_macro jive_macro_quote" modifiedtitle="true"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;only one volume&lt;/STRONG&gt; and a number of luns&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 11:02:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/rebalance-over-loaded-luns-between-aggregates/m-p/518#M5402</guid>
      <dc:creator>aborzenkov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-09-30T11:02:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: rebalance over-loaded luns between aggregates</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/rebalance-over-loaded-luns-between-aggregates/m-p/522#M5403</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;just wanted to make sure, does "vol move" also move luns? I only wanted to move some luns within a volume, not entire volume. could you show me the syntax to use "vol move" to move luns?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;snapmirror will copy the entire volume not on luns level, right? If I use snapmirror, I would have to copy the whole volume first, then remove those un-needed luns at the destination?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you all for your messages&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 13:22:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/rebalance-over-loaded-luns-between-aggregates/m-p/522#M5403</guid>
      <dc:creator>netappmagic</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-09-30T13:22:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: rebalance over-loaded luns between aggregates</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/rebalance-over-loaded-luns-between-aggregates/m-p/527#M5404</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;vol move will move an entire volume (that's why it's called vol move) and all the luns inside that volume will move along with it.&amp;nbsp; This is non-disruptive.&amp;nbsp; However, since you want to move only a few luns out of the volume, you can't use vol move.&amp;nbsp; If non-disruption is a priority, my recommendation is to create new matching luns on the destination/new volume and use host-based mirroring (if available on your OS) to get the data copied over.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2013 14:54:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/rebalance-over-loaded-luns-between-aggregates/m-p/527#M5404</guid>
      <dc:creator>resqme914</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-10-01T14:54:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: rebalance over-loaded luns between aggregates</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/rebalance-over-loaded-luns-between-aggregates/m-p/532#M5405</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've done it a few times, used snapmirror due to the lack of downtime. it was from 30 minutes to an hour, or sometimes even less 10-15 minutes. It depends on server (VM or physical) and snapdrive how fast they are&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2013 15:00:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/rebalance-over-loaded-luns-between-aggregates/m-p/532#M5405</guid>
      <dc:creator>vims</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-10-01T15:00:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: rebalance over-loaded luns between aggregates</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/rebalance-over-loaded-luns-between-aggregates/m-p/537#M5406</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;vims,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is my quesitons about using snapmirror. I only want to migrate some luns in a volume. As I understand, snapmirror only can copy entire volume not luns. Do you mean that I have to copy the entire volume first, then map only luns I need?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, as I understand, I still need to resync in last step while the lun is un-accessable, so, during this short time, there would be still a short downtime, is not it? even though&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2013 15:15:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/rebalance-over-loaded-luns-between-aggregates/m-p/537#M5406</guid>
      <dc:creator>netappmagic</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-10-01T15:15:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: rebalance over-loaded luns between aggregates</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/rebalance-over-loaded-luns-between-aggregates/m-p/541#M5407</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;PRE __jive_macro_name="quote" class="jive_text_macro jive_macro_quote"&gt;&lt;P&gt;netappmagic wrote:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;vims,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is my quesitons about using snapmirror. I only want to migrate some luns in a volume. As I understand, snapmirror only can copy entire volume not luns. Do you mean that I have to copy the entire volume first, then map only luns I need?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, as I understand, I still need to resync in last step while the lun is un-accessable, so, during this short time, there would be still a short downtime, is not it? even though&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. Yes it is correct. You can delete luns you do not need later on and use luns of your choice.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. yes - resync is the vital step. I did it in MS SQL environment, stopped SQL server first - resync - reconnect &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2013 15:31:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/rebalance-over-loaded-luns-between-aggregates/m-p/541#M5407</guid>
      <dc:creator>vims</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-10-01T15:31:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: rebalance over-loaded luns between aggregates</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/rebalance-over-loaded-luns-between-aggregates/m-p/550#M5408</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Great, vims, Thanks a lot, we are in the same page.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just wanted to confirm, and make sure I understand you. So, will there be a short downtime when you stop SQL server, in my case, I will have to somehow stop accessing the lun? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2013 15:43:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/rebalance-over-loaded-luns-between-aggregates/m-p/550#M5408</guid>
      <dc:creator>netappmagic</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-10-01T15:43:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: rebalance over-loaded luns between aggregates</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/rebalance-over-loaded-luns-between-aggregates/m-p/554#M5409</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;PRE __jive_macro_name="quote" class="jive_text_macro jive_macro_quote"&gt;&lt;P&gt;netappmagic wrote:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Great, vims, Thanks a lot, we are in the same page.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just wanted to confirm, and make sure I understand you. So, will there be a short downtime when you stop SQL server, in my case, I will have to somehow stop accessing the lun? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;yes there will be a downtime, i coordinated it with DBAs. They stopped SQL Servers, then i did my job - run snapmirror update. Disconect drives (luns) and reconnect to the new location. However there are a few steps you have to complete with snapmirror relationship. Once update is completed - then break snapmirror and delete it. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2013 16:25:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/rebalance-over-loaded-luns-between-aggregates/m-p/554#M5409</guid>
      <dc:creator>vims</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-10-01T16:25:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

