<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: SM-SQL &amp;amp; VMDKs / Remote Verification / SnapVault queries in Data Protection</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SM-SQL-amp-VMDKs-Remote-Verification-SnapVault-queries/m-p/2130#M5959</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Joel and welcome to the Community! &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.netapp.com/5.0.1/images/emoticons/happy.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Good questions really!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE __jive_macro_name="quote" class="jive_text_macro jive_macro_quote" modifiedtitle="true"&gt; we believe that if we use VMDKs we will be unable to do &lt;STRONG style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;remote &lt;/STRONG&gt;verification of SM-SQL snaps using DBCC? &lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;It is possible, but the caveat used to be that you need a separate vCenter server at the destination for this to work - haven't seen anything suggesting it changed recently.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE __jive_macro_name="quote" class="jive_text_macro jive_macro_quote" modifiedtitle="true"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please advise whether or not SnapVault integration is supported for VMDK disks?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;SMSQL is integrated with SnapVault via Protection Manager datasets - I've never heard about this not working with VMDKs, but having someone else's input re this would be nice.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Radek&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 17:01:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>radek_kubka</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-23T17:01:47Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SM-SQL &amp; VMDKs / Remote Verification / SnapVault queries</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SM-SQL-amp-VMDKs-Remote-Verification-SnapVault-queries/m-p/2125#M5958</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are planning to implement SM-SQL across our environment imminently.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We wish to take advantage of the following:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;* Latest version of SM-SQL / SDW&lt;BR /&gt;* VMDKs as opposed to RDMs to simplify &amp;amp; ease administration&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;* Remote verification on our secondary site of SQL snapshots using separate SQL verification server&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;* SnapVault on our secondary site for longer retentions of SM-SQL Snapshots&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Firstly, we believe that if we use VMDKs we will be unable to do &lt;SPAN style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;remote &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;verification of SM-SQL snaps using DBCC?&amp;nbsp; Please can this be confirmed by NetApp Admins on this site?&amp;nbsp; Also if this is correct, are there any plans in the NetApp roadmap for support for remote verification in the near future?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Secondly, we would like to take advantage of SnapVault on our secondary site so we can retain SM-SQL snapshots there for longer retentions, with shorter retentions on our primary site to reduce disk space requirements.&amp;nbsp; Please advise whether or not SnapVault integration is supported for VMDK disks? - if not, again are there any plans in the NetApp roadmap for support for SnapVault integation in the near future?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for any assistance in advance,&lt;BR /&gt;JK&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:04:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SM-SQL-amp-VMDKs-Remote-Verification-SnapVault-queries/m-p/2125#M5958</guid>
      <dc:creator>JOELKENYON</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:04:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SM-SQL &amp; VMDKs / Remote Verification / SnapVault queries</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SM-SQL-amp-VMDKs-Remote-Verification-SnapVault-queries/m-p/2130#M5959</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Joel and welcome to the Community! &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.netapp.com/5.0.1/images/emoticons/happy.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Good questions really!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE __jive_macro_name="quote" class="jive_text_macro jive_macro_quote" modifiedtitle="true"&gt; we believe that if we use VMDKs we will be unable to do &lt;STRONG style="text-decoration: underline;"&gt;remote &lt;/STRONG&gt;verification of SM-SQL snaps using DBCC? &lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;It is possible, but the caveat used to be that you need a separate vCenter server at the destination for this to work - haven't seen anything suggesting it changed recently.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE __jive_macro_name="quote" class="jive_text_macro jive_macro_quote" modifiedtitle="true"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please advise whether or not SnapVault integration is supported for VMDK disks?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;SMSQL is integrated with SnapVault via Protection Manager datasets - I've never heard about this not working with VMDKs, but having someone else's input re this would be nice.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Radek&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 17:01:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SM-SQL-amp-VMDKs-Remote-Verification-SnapVault-queries/m-p/2130#M5959</guid>
      <dc:creator>radek_kubka</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-23T17:01:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SM-SQL &amp; VMDKs / Remote Verification / SnapVault queries</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SM-SQL-amp-VMDKs-Remote-Verification-SnapVault-queries/m-p/2134#M5960</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your speedy reply Radek. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Good news that we can indeed do remote verification using a separate VMWare infrastructure (including separate V-Center) at our secondary site.&amp;nbsp; We will begin testing on this ASAP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;On SMSQL integration with SnapVault via Protection Manager, any comments from others on this subject would be appreciated as we believed that this wasn't supported?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;JK&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 09:48:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SM-SQL-amp-VMDKs-Remote-Verification-SnapVault-queries/m-p/2134#M5960</guid>
      <dc:creator>JOELKENYON</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-24T09:48:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

