<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Using &amp;quot;crash consistent&amp;quot; snapshots for MSSQL backup/recovery? in Data Protection</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/Using-quot-crash-consistent-quot-snapshots-for-MSSQL-backup-recovery/m-p/35775#M6560</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Oracle has the ability to use crash consistent snapshots as valid backups (TR-3858) which means that entire volumes of Oracle databases can be easily backed up and restored with little intrusion into the guest OS at the time of the snapshot.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am doing my due diligence on MSSQL and was wondering if there is anything that can be done to provide the same capability for MSSQL.&amp;nbsp; While we do have the SMSQL software, we are looking for an easier methodology to deploy, since we have literally hundreds of MSSQL databases.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The details:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Running NFS datastores to VMware&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;All database/OS files are contained within VMDKs on the same volumes (no consistency groups needed)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Various MSSQL versions...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Average database size ~300Gb&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Fitz&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:34:40 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ericfitzpatrick</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:34:40Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Using "crash consistent" snapshots for MSSQL backup/recovery?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/Using-quot-crash-consistent-quot-snapshots-for-MSSQL-backup-recovery/m-p/35775#M6560</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Oracle has the ability to use crash consistent snapshots as valid backups (TR-3858) which means that entire volumes of Oracle databases can be easily backed up and restored with little intrusion into the guest OS at the time of the snapshot.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am doing my due diligence on MSSQL and was wondering if there is anything that can be done to provide the same capability for MSSQL.&amp;nbsp; While we do have the SMSQL software, we are looking for an easier methodology to deploy, since we have literally hundreds of MSSQL databases.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The details:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Running NFS datastores to VMware&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;All database/OS files are contained within VMDKs on the same volumes (no consistency groups needed)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Various MSSQL versions...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Average database size ~300Gb&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Fitz&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:34:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/Using-quot-crash-consistent-quot-snapshots-for-MSSQL-backup-recovery/m-p/35775#M6560</guid>
      <dc:creator>ericfitzpatrick</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:34:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Using "crash consistent" snapshots for MSSQL backup/recovery?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/Using-quot-crash-consistent-quot-snapshots-for-MSSQL-backup-recovery/m-p/35780#M6561</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;BTW, I spoke with MS SQL Development, and, currently, there is no way of doing this, nor is there any means of doing this on the roadmap.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 17:28:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/Using-quot-crash-consistent-quot-snapshots-for-MSSQL-backup-recovery/m-p/35780#M6561</guid>
      <dc:creator>ericfitzpatrick</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-06-14T17:28:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Using "crash consistent" snapshots for MSSQL backup/recovery?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/Using-quot-crash-consistent-quot-snapshots-for-MSSQL-backup-recovery/m-p/35784#M6562</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Eric ,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would like to inform you that SQL Server is application consistent. SMSQL does generate application consistent snapshots.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Abhishek&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 09:07:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/Using-quot-crash-consistent-quot-snapshots-for-MSSQL-backup-recovery/m-p/35784#M6562</guid>
      <dc:creator>abhisek</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-06-15T09:07:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Using "crash consistent" snapshots for MSSQL backup/recovery?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/Using-quot-crash-consistent-quot-snapshots-for-MSSQL-backup-recovery/m-p/35789#M6563</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I apologize - it seems that I left out a few details:&amp;nbsp; While we can get a crash consistent backup at any time via snapshots, when you restore MSSQL from a crash consistent backup (snapshot), the database opens without any chance of applying transaction logs.&amp;nbsp; If the ability to apply logs is required, the backup has to be application consistent (e.g., using.SnapManager for SQL).&amp;nbsp; Oracle and DB2 do *not* have this issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sorry I omitted the important details.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Fitz&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 12:21:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/Using-quot-crash-consistent-quot-snapshots-for-MSSQL-backup-recovery/m-p/35789#M6563</guid>
      <dc:creator>ericfitzpatrick</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-06-15T12:21:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Using "crash consistent" snapshots for MSSQL backup/recovery?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/Using-quot-crash-consistent-quot-snapshots-for-MSSQL-backup-recovery/m-p/35794#M6564</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;Providing you will be lucky enough to recover from a crash consistent MS SQL snapshot - it doesn't have the same 4k block granularity / alignment as Oracle.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 20:23:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/Using-quot-crash-consistent-quot-snapshots-for-MSSQL-backup-recovery/m-p/35794#M6564</guid>
      <dc:creator>radek_kubka</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-06-15T20:23:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

