<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Inconsistent interface names, ndmpd.preferred_interface and HA in Data Protection</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/Inconsistent-interface-names-ndmpd-preferred-interface-and-HA/m-p/45601#M6600</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi all&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just been looking at a HA pair system where the interface groups (VIFs) on each controller have different names and I want to enable ndmpd.preferred_interface on the controllers. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When running options ndmpd.preferred_interface &amp;lt;interface name&amp;gt; the following warning message is displayed:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You are changing option ndmpd.preferred_interface which applies to both members of&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the HA configuration in takeover mode.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This value must be the same in both HA members prior to any takeover&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;or giveback, or that next takeover/giveback may not work correctly.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anyone have any knowledge of what will actually happen during CF failover if the ndmpd.preferred_interface value is different on each node? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In this case the ifgrp on controller A is "ifgrpA" and on controller B it is "ifgrpB". The partnert interface names are configure correctly in ifconfig (ifgrpA's partner is ifgrpB and vice versa) but this is a different issue. I will probably need to change the ifgrp names anyway but I would like some idea of the risk before proceeding.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:23:41 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>akw_white</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:23:41Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Inconsistent interface names, ndmpd.preferred_interface and HA</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/Inconsistent-interface-names-ndmpd-preferred-interface-and-HA/m-p/45601#M6600</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi all&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just been looking at a HA pair system where the interface groups (VIFs) on each controller have different names and I want to enable ndmpd.preferred_interface on the controllers. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When running options ndmpd.preferred_interface &amp;lt;interface name&amp;gt; the following warning message is displayed:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You are changing option ndmpd.preferred_interface which applies to both members of&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the HA configuration in takeover mode.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This value must be the same in both HA members prior to any takeover&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;or giveback, or that next takeover/giveback may not work correctly.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does anyone have any knowledge of what will actually happen during CF failover if the ndmpd.preferred_interface value is different on each node? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In this case the ifgrp on controller A is "ifgrpA" and on controller B it is "ifgrpB". The partnert interface names are configure correctly in ifconfig (ifgrpA's partner is ifgrpB and vice versa) but this is a different issue. I will probably need to change the ifgrp names anyway but I would like some idea of the risk before proceeding.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:23:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/Inconsistent-interface-names-ndmpd-preferred-interface-and-HA/m-p/45601#M6600</guid>
      <dc:creator>akw_white</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:23:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Inconsistent interface names, ndmpd.preferred_interface and HA</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/Inconsistent-interface-names-ndmpd-preferred-interface-and-HA/m-p/45606#M6601</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have to test on a live system but the option should be assumed by the failed node on takeover. So if nodeA ha ifgrpA preferred and nodeB has IfgrpB preferred then on takeover of b by a then b in failover node will use ifgrpA which doesn't exist in b. although not sure if it would work if a is the partner interface. Good question and need to test to confirm what happens.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 03:03:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/Inconsistent-interface-names-ndmpd-preferred-interface-and-HA/m-p/45606#M6601</guid>
      <dc:creator>scottgelb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-07-03T03:03:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

