<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: SMSQL scheduled jobs on MSCS in Data Protection</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SMSQL-scheduled-jobs-on-MSCS/m-p/72318#M6674</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;OK, so we have now resolved this small problem.&amp;nbsp; I basically checked the Scheduled Tasks and found that there were two jobs that were running at exactly the same time.&amp;nbsp; Basic really but it took a while to find it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Good luck!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 12:18:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>GOODFELLA2071</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-07-03T12:18:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SMSQL scheduled jobs on MSCS</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SMSQL-scheduled-jobs-on-MSCS/m-p/72307#M6672</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: 'Arial','sans-serif'; color: #333333; font-size: 10pt;"&gt;Hi.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: 'Arial','sans-serif'; color: #333333; font-size: 10pt;"&gt;SMSQL 5.0&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: 'Arial','sans-serif'; color: #333333; font-size: 10pt;"&gt;2003 cluster active/passive&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: 'Arial','sans-serif'; color: #333333; font-size: 10pt;"&gt;Windows scheduled jobs both active on both nodes.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: 'Arial','sans-serif'; color: #333333; font-size: 10pt;"&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: 'Arial','sans-serif'; color: #333333; font-size: 10pt;"&gt;My understanding is that windows scheduled jobs are not cluster aware therefore the job needs to enabled on both nodes in case 1 node dies. Unfortunately this leads to the annoying failure email message from SMSQL on the passive node.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: 'Arial','sans-serif'; color: #333333; font-size: 10pt;"&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM style="color: #333333; font-size: 10pt; font-family: 'Arial','sans-serif';"&gt;The requested SnapManager operation cannot start at this time because there is another SnapManager operation currently in progress. Please retry this operation after the current operation has finished.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt; &lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Has anyone found a way round this or are SQL jobs the best solution on clusters?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Andy&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:53:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SMSQL-scheduled-jobs-on-MSCS/m-p/72307#M6672</guid>
      <dc:creator>andymac73</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:53:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SMSQL scheduled jobs on MSCS</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SMSQL-scheduled-jobs-on-MSCS/m-p/72313#M6673</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We too have recently started receiving these e-mails in our Notifications inbox.&amp;nbsp; Nothing has changed recently, in particular no timings or frequency of backup jobs have changed so I am completely at a loss as to why we are receiving these messages all of a sudden.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If anybody has any solution or additional information that can be provided it would be most gratefully appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kind Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Justin Medcraft&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 Jun 2012 06:25:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SMSQL-scheduled-jobs-on-MSCS/m-p/72313#M6673</guid>
      <dc:creator>GOODFELLA2071</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-06-16T06:25:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SMSQL scheduled jobs on MSCS</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SMSQL-scheduled-jobs-on-MSCS/m-p/72318#M6674</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;OK, so we have now resolved this small problem.&amp;nbsp; I basically checked the Scheduled Tasks and found that there were two jobs that were running at exactly the same time.&amp;nbsp; Basic really but it took a while to find it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Good luck!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 12:18:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SMSQL-scheduled-jobs-on-MSCS/m-p/72318#M6674</guid>
      <dc:creator>GOODFELLA2071</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-07-03T12:18:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SMSQL scheduled jobs on MSCS</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SMSQL-scheduled-jobs-on-MSCS/m-p/72323#M6675</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the update.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2012 19:48:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SMSQL-scheduled-jobs-on-MSCS/m-p/72323#M6675</guid>
      <dc:creator>abhisek</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-07-03T19:48:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SMSQL scheduled jobs on MSCS</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SMSQL-scheduled-jobs-on-MSCS/m-p/72329#M6676</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;As a plan B we configure all our schedule jobs on both nodes to call a script on a cluster drive path.&amp;nbsp; Only the active node can access the drive which has the scripts that do the work.&amp;nbsp; So the passive node will just go back to sleep.&amp;nbsp; Reduces maintenance too, as only a single copy of the 'active' scripts live on the shared drive and the local schedule batch files are just pointers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope it helps&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bren &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PS - Always worth closing the thread once you have your answer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2012 21:43:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SMSQL-scheduled-jobs-on-MSCS/m-p/72329#M6676</guid>
      <dc:creator>BrendonHiggins</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-07-31T21:43:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

