<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: SnapCreator 4.1: Consistency group Snapshot with vFilers in Data Protection</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SnapCreator-4-1-Consistency-group-Snapshot-with-vFilers/m-p/72199#M710</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Siva&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your answer. This help me a lot.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When I understand your Explanation correct, we are not affected:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;--&amp;gt; The Volumes are in the vfilers, but snapcreator communicate exclusively with the pfiler.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is this correct?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;regards &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thomas&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2014 14:37:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>brauntisc</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-03-10T14:37:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SnapCreator 4.1: Consistency group Snapshot with vFilers</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SnapCreator-4-1-Consistency-group-Snapshot-with-vFilers/m-p/72186#M708</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi All&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have read the Release Notes of SnapCreator 4.1. Under Known limitations I found following line:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Consistency group Snapshot with vFilers is not supported&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In the Release Notes of Snapcreator 4.0 this limitation is not described. Why is this limitation?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it right, that I don't have this limitation in 4.0?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In the Moment we have SnapCreator 3.5 with vfilers and CG Snapshots for Oracle DB Backups.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;TIA&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thomas&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 05:41:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SnapCreator-4-1-Consistency-group-Snapshot-with-vFilers/m-p/72186#M708</guid>
      <dc:creator>brauntisc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T05:41:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SnapCreator 4.1: Consistency group Snapshot with vFilers</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SnapCreator-4-1-Consistency-group-Snapshot-with-vFilers/m-p/72191#M709</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Thomas, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You will still be able to run CG snapshots on vfilers. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The thing that is not supported is around wafl_sync along with CG snapshot, as enabled by this parameter below. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;NTAP_CONSISTENCY_GROUP_WAFL_SYNC=Y&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There are cases, where SC can issue a wafl_sync before a cg snapshot. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since wafl_sync is not enabled at a vfiler level, and only available in pfiler level, having the above setting will cause SC to fail.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please let me know if you have further questions.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;Siva Ramanathan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2014 14:23:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SnapCreator-4-1-Consistency-group-Snapshot-with-vFilers/m-p/72191#M709</guid>
      <dc:creator>sivar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-03-10T14:23:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SnapCreator 4.1: Consistency group Snapshot with vFilers</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SnapCreator-4-1-Consistency-group-Snapshot-with-vFilers/m-p/72199#M710</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Siva&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your answer. This help me a lot.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When I understand your Explanation correct, we are not affected:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;--&amp;gt; The Volumes are in the vfilers, but snapcreator communicate exclusively with the pfiler.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is this correct?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;regards &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thomas&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2014 14:37:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SnapCreator-4-1-Consistency-group-Snapshot-with-vFilers/m-p/72199#M710</guid>
      <dc:creator>brauntisc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-03-10T14:37:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SnapCreator 4.1: Consistency group Snapshot with vFilers</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SnapCreator-4-1-Consistency-group-Snapshot-with-vFilers/m-p/72204#M711</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes Thomas.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ONTAP supports cg-start and cg-commit at both pfiler and vfiler level. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Snap Creator also supports both pfiler and vfiler level. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Your current config should continue to work. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The only change that happened around 4.0p1d2 time-frame is the inclusion of NTAP_CONSISTENCY_GROUP_WAFL_SYNC&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is not supported at the vfiler level&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As long as you leave NTAP_CONSISTENCY_GROUP_WAFL_SYNC=N you are fine&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;Siva Ramanathan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2014 14:52:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SnapCreator-4-1-Consistency-group-Snapshot-with-vFilers/m-p/72204#M711</guid>
      <dc:creator>sivar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-03-10T14:52:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SnapCreator 4.1: Consistency group Snapshot with vFilers</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SnapCreator-4-1-Consistency-group-Snapshot-with-vFilers/m-p/72213#M712</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Personally, I would not use WAFL_SYNC anyway. I would be surprised if that’s every helpful, and it can cause delays and timeouts.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2014 15:16:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SnapCreator-4-1-Consistency-group-Snapshot-with-vFilers/m-p/72213#M712</guid>
      <dc:creator>steiner</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-03-10T15:16:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SnapCreator 4.1: Consistency group Snapshot with vFilers</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SnapCreator-4-1-Consistency-group-Snapshot-with-vFilers/m-p/72217#M713</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Siva&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Perfect.. Thanks for your explanations...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thomas&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2014 11:26:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SnapCreator-4-1-Consistency-group-Snapshot-with-vFilers/m-p/72217#M713</guid>
      <dc:creator>brauntisc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-03-11T11:26:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

