<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: NetApp SAN storage create ucode option? in Data Protection</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/NetApp-SAN-storage-create-ucode-option/m-p/70720#M7280</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks for the answer!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;but we have the following warning...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;===== SYSCONFIG-C =====&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 11.0pt; font-family: 'Calibri','sans-serif';"&gt;sysconfig: Unless directed by IBM Service and Support volumes ...... &lt;/SPAN&gt;should have the volume option create_ucode set to On.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and also in some document i read that we have to enable &lt;SPAN style="color: #000000;"&gt;create ucode option &lt;/SPAN&gt;for the volume containing LUN&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 19:28:22 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mmaliakas</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-03-21T19:28:22Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>NetApp SAN storage create ucode option?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/NetApp-SAN-storage-create-ucode-option/m-p/70708#M7277</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; I read some doc in now site saying that we have to enable &lt;SPAN style="color: #ff0000;"&gt;create ucode option &lt;/SPAN&gt;for the volume containing LUN.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My question here is &lt;SPAN style="color: #ff0000;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;create ucode option enable or disable&lt;/STRONG&gt; &lt;/SPAN&gt;, this will make any difference ? If yes what is the difference.?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have seen at one customer place they are using SAN with volume containing LUN , but create ucode option is disabled . Here they are using FCP LUNs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But there is no issues here create ucode option disbaled , everything is working fine so far. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:03:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/NetApp-SAN-storage-create-ucode-option/m-p/70708#M7277</guid>
      <dc:creator>whitingha</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:03:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NetApp SAN storage create ucode option?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/NetApp-SAN-storage-create-ucode-option/m-p/70712#M7278</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;i ' m also concern about this matter. any help would be appreciated&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;changing this option to on would have some kind of impact to the data&amp;nbsp; ??&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;does it require downtime?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;anyone ??&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 09:54:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/NetApp-SAN-storage-create-ucode-option/m-p/70712#M7278</guid>
      <dc:creator>mmaliakas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-03-21T09:54:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NetApp SAN storage create ucode option?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/NetApp-SAN-storage-create-ucode-option/m-p/70716#M7279</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This option is meaningless for SAN and has no impact on the SAN data in a volume:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Times-Bold;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Times-Bold;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P align="left"&gt;create_ucode on &lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Times-Roman;"&gt;| &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Times-Bold;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;off&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P align="left"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P align="left"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Times-Bold;"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;Setting this option to on forces UNICODE format directories to be created by default,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P align="left"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Times-Bold;"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;both from NFS and CIFS.&amp;nbsp; By default, it is set to off, in which case, all directories are&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P align="left"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Times-Bold;"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;created in pre-4.0 format, and this first CIFS access will convert it to UNICODE format.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P align="left"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Times-Bold;"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P align="left"&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Times-Bold;"&gt;&lt;STRONG style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Times-Bold;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;STRONG style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Times-Bold;"&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Times-Bold;"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P align="left"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN id="mce_marker"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P align="left"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P align="left"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P align="left"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Times-Bold;"&gt;&lt;SPAN id="mce_marker"&gt;&lt;SPAN id="mce_marker"&gt;&lt;SPAN id="mce_marker"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P align="left"&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 19:21:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/NetApp-SAN-storage-create-ucode-option/m-p/70716#M7279</guid>
      <dc:creator>knight</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-03-21T19:21:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NetApp SAN storage create ucode option?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/NetApp-SAN-storage-create-ucode-option/m-p/70720#M7280</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks for the answer!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;but we have the following warning...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;===== SYSCONFIG-C =====&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 11.0pt; font-family: 'Calibri','sans-serif';"&gt;sysconfig: Unless directed by IBM Service and Support volumes ...... &lt;/SPAN&gt;should have the volume option create_ucode set to On.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and also in some document i read that we have to enable &lt;SPAN style="color: #000000;"&gt;create ucode option &lt;/SPAN&gt;for the volume containing LUN&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2012 19:28:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/NetApp-SAN-storage-create-ucode-option/m-p/70720#M7280</guid>
      <dc:creator>mmaliakas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-03-21T19:28:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NetApp SAN storage create ucode option?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/NetApp-SAN-storage-create-ucode-option/m-p/70723#M7281</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Well, then ...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Why documentation requires it to be on for volumes, containing LUNs? Why SnapDrive explicitly enables it on volumes when creating LUN?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 02:57:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/NetApp-SAN-storage-create-ucode-option/m-p/70723#M7281</guid>
      <dc:creator>aborzenkov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-03-22T02:57:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: NetApp SAN storage create ucode option?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/NetApp-SAN-storage-create-ucode-option/m-p/70727#M7282</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Turns out the next generation of the documentation is addressing this.&amp;nbsp; As for why?&amp;nbsp; That goes back in history to before my time.&amp;nbsp; But, note that this option has only a binary state.&amp;nbsp; The option always exists, and must be set to either enabled or disabled.&amp;nbsp; So SnapDrive has to make a choice; and it picked enabled.&amp;nbsp; SnapDrive assumes that if, in the future, NFS/CIFS directories are ever put onto this volume, the new format should be used rather than the old.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2012 20:46:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/NetApp-SAN-storage-create-ucode-option/m-p/70727#M7282</guid>
      <dc:creator>knight</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-03-22T20:46:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

