<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: CIFS Share Backup with extreme Retentions in Data Protection</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/CIFS-Share-Backup-with-extreme-Retentions/m-p/17575#M790</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Snap Creator does not have a yearly policy yet. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You may definitely use what Chris is suggesting and keep ad-hoc backups for a longer duration. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2014 15:30:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>sivar</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-03-26T15:30:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>CIFS Share Backup with extreme Retentions</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/CIFS-Share-Backup-with-extreme-Retentions/m-p/17566#M788</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Guys&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One of our Customers wants to migrate some File-Servers to native CIFS on our NetApp.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;All together we talk around 24TB of User-Data (Profiles, Documents, private Archives).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Putting it on one or two Volumes with Deduplication enabled and doing Snapshots for 30 Days shouldn't be the Problem there. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The special requirement we are not sure on how to implement is the monthly and yearly Backup they have on the old Servers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Obviously they want something similar on the new Solution for legal requirements.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The two Options that come to mind are SnapVault and Snap2Tape, both I'm not quite sure how to implement.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Updating the Vault only once a month probably causes major problems with the data-transfer taking days and the vault-lag alarms driving storage admins nuts. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But when updating it daily with the normal Snapshots, maybe with only keeping one version on Vault I'm not sure it would help the monthly/yearly Jobs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Probably we would have to configure it in separate SC-Configs with different Snapshot-Names (but the same Source and Target Volumes/FIlers), don't know how that impacts everything.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For the Snap2Tape Option we probably have to mount a Snap to a MediaServer that writes out and indexes the Data or use NDMP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Both Options require separate Scheduling and Mechanisms for restoring Data. Anything there to integrate it directly to SnapCreator or attached Tools?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In case it helps here the current "classic" Backup Schedule in place:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Daily differential Incremental to Tape, Retention 1 Month&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Weekly Full Backup to Tape, Retention 1 Month&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Monthly Full Backup to Tape, Retention 1 Year&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yearly Full Backup to Tape, Retention 10 Years&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for any suggestion&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;BR Stefan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 05:39:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/CIFS-Share-Backup-with-extreme-Retentions/m-p/17566#M788</guid>
      <dc:creator>SVOLLRAT1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T05:39:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CIFS Share Backup with extreme Retentions</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/CIFS-Share-Backup-with-extreme-Retentions/m-p/17570#M789</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SC can run your snapvaults and manage the retentions on the vault copy. Not sure about yearly support, but you could make a policy and call it yearly. Updating the vault copy every day and only keep 1 daily, as you described will keep the transfer time smaller. Using NTAP_SNAPSHOT_RETENTION_AGE in conjunction to the policy retention, will allow runing ad-hoc backups and not cause scheduled snapshots to be deleted prematurely.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;--&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Chris&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2014 15:13:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/CIFS-Share-Backup-with-extreme-Retentions/m-p/17570#M789</guid>
      <dc:creator>clilescapario</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-03-26T15:13:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CIFS Share Backup with extreme Retentions</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/CIFS-Share-Backup-with-extreme-Retentions/m-p/17575#M790</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Snap Creator does not have a yearly policy yet. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You may definitely use what Chris is suggesting and keep ad-hoc backups for a longer duration. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2014 15:30:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/CIFS-Share-Backup-with-extreme-Retentions/m-p/17575#M790</guid>
      <dc:creator>sivar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-03-26T15:30:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CIFS Share Backup with extreme Retentions</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/CIFS-Share-Backup-with-extreme-Retentions/m-p/17580#M791</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any suggestions on an Tape-Out Option?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2014 08:48:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/CIFS-Share-Backup-with-extreme-Retentions/m-p/17580#M791</guid>
      <dc:creator>SVOLLRAT1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-03-28T08:48:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: CIFS Share Backup with extreme Retentions</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/CIFS-Share-Backup-with-extreme-Retentions/m-p/17585#M792</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Stefan,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have a few customers that are sending Snapshots to tape using the CLI commands of their tape utility and calling those commands through Snap Creator.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One customer users Snap Creator to quiesce the database, takes a snapshot using SnapDrive, unquiesces the database, then mounts the Snapshot copy to a drive letter or mount point.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since they have the Snapshot mounted to a specific drive letter they then use their tape utility to schedule a job through that tool to send to tape.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The next time Snap Creator runs the first action is to unmount the drive letter/mount point, then quiesce/Snapshot/unquiesce/mount&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The reason for doing the tape operation outside of Snap Creator is that the tape operation take a long time to run, and this prevents any time out issues from occurring in Snap Creator.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Snap Creator really doesn't have any integrated tape options, so a product like SnapProtect might be better if tape is a big concern and you only want one product to manage.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;John&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2014 12:05:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/CIFS-Share-Backup-with-extreme-Retentions/m-p/17585#M792</guid>
      <dc:creator>spinks</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-03-28T12:05:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

