<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Implementing Snapdrive in a secure multi tenant environment in Data Protection</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/Implementing-Snapdrive-in-a-secure-multi-tenant-environment/m-p/4355#M8532</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a partner that is asking the following question:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;"I’m hoping you can help get me some advice on implementing snapdrive in a secure multi tenant environment.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt; &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;We have numerous customers on the same storage and virtual centre and they want to be able to use SnapDrive and SMSQL, however we haven’t been able to work out how this can be achieved securely.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt; &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Is there someone who can provide some advice?"&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt; &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt; &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Elias&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:59:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>biescas</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:59:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Implementing Snapdrive in a secure multi tenant environment</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/Implementing-Snapdrive-in-a-secure-multi-tenant-environment/m-p/4355#M8532</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a partner that is asking the following question:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;"I’m hoping you can help get me some advice on implementing snapdrive in a secure multi tenant environment.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt; &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;We have numerous customers on the same storage and virtual centre and they want to be able to use SnapDrive and SMSQL, however we haven’t been able to work out how this can be achieved securely.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt; &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Is there someone who can provide some advice?"&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt; &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt; &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Elias&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:59:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/Implementing-Snapdrive-in-a-secure-multi-tenant-environment/m-p/4355#M8532</guid>
      <dc:creator>biescas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:59:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Implementing Snapdrive in a secure multi tenant environment</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/Implementing-Snapdrive-in-a-secure-multi-tenant-environment/m-p/4360#M8533</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have you asked your customer to look into storacl tool, as using that you can configure RBAC.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Though I don't have any experience with RBAC and storacl however I don't see a reson for this to not work.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 12:36:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/Implementing-Snapdrive-in-a-secure-multi-tenant-environment/m-p/4360#M8533</guid>
      <dc:creator>lovik_netapp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-02-25T12:36:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

