<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: SMSQL Query in Data Protection</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SMSQL-Query/m-p/23893#M9188</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The SMSQL database needs to be seperate so that it can still be available to restore the target database, if needed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;At your service,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Eugene Kashpureff&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 08:41:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ekashpureff</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-11-01T08:41:17Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SMSQL Query</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SMSQL-Query/m-p/23888#M9187</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; IHAC they are going to implemented SMSQL 5.0RC1 version and Customer has some quire why we need to separate the system database and Used database into separate LUN.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;P.Masoodoli&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;+919972251403&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:06:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SMSQL-Query/m-p/23888#M9187</guid>
      <dc:creator>masood</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:06:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SMSQL Query</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SMSQL-Query/m-p/23893#M9188</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The SMSQL database needs to be seperate so that it can still be available to restore the target database, if needed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;At your service,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Eugene Kashpureff&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 08:41:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SMSQL-Query/m-p/23893#M9188</guid>
      <dc:creator>ekashpureff</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-11-01T08:41:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SMSQL Query</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SMSQL-Query/m-p/23898#M9189</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm on leave from 30th Oct to 12th Nov. Please contact my manager&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Senthil (senthilk@netapp.com) for anything urgent.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; Vrishali&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 08:42:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SMSQL-Query/m-p/23898#M9189</guid>
      <dc:creator>vrishali</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-11-01T08:42:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

