<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Could SDU work with RDMS on VMWare thru FCP? in Data Protection</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/Could-SDU-work-with-RDMS-on-VMWare-thru-FCP/m-p/69848#M9367</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your answer&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Somebody told me this will work in SDU 4.2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best my friend!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mauricio &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 00:09:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>rojas</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-07-03T00:09:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Could SDU work with RDMS on VMWare thru FCP?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/Could-SDU-work-with-RDMS-on-VMWare-thru-FCP/m-p/69836#M9365</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have a customer who is looking to Protect its existing Oracle DB on Virtual Linux Servers on VMware&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The VM Hosts is connected to the data thru FCP using RDMS.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think SDU doesnt support this env officially, but could it work?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mauricio&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:12:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/Could-SDU-work-with-RDMS-on-VMWare-thru-FCP/m-p/69836#M9365</guid>
      <dc:creator>rojas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:12:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Could SDU work with RDMS on VMWare thru FCP?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/Could-SDU-work-with-RDMS-on-VMWare-thru-FCP/m-p/69840#M9366</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't think it will work.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SnapDrive needs to be aware of the virtualisation stack to see &amp;amp; manage RDMs - that is exactly the case with SDW 6.2 which supports both FC &amp;amp; iSCSI RDMs. Prior to SDW 6.1 the only solution was to use software iSCSI initiator from the guest OS, because it looks &amp;amp; behaves identically in both virtual &amp;amp; physical environment.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So this is my understanding of the current state of play with SDU - software initiator is a must, because SDU is still not virtualisation-aware.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Radek&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 20:25:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/Could-SDU-work-with-RDMS-on-VMWare-thru-FCP/m-p/69840#M9366</guid>
      <dc:creator>radek_kubka</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-06-30T20:25:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Could SDU work with RDMS on VMWare thru FCP?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/Could-SDU-work-with-RDMS-on-VMWare-thru-FCP/m-p/69848#M9367</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your answer&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Somebody told me this will work in SDU 4.2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best my friend!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mauricio &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jul 2010 00:09:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/Could-SDU-work-with-RDMS-on-VMWare-thru-FCP/m-p/69848#M9367</guid>
      <dc:creator>rojas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-03T00:09:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

