<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic SMSQL with SQL System Root in Data Protection</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SMSQL-with-SQL-System-Root/m-p/27320#M9511</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Guys,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a customer with this configuration: Drive D:\, Drive L:\ and Drive R:\. The drive D:\ are the SQL System Root and Users Database, drive L:\ are the logs of all Databases and drive R:\ are to SnapInfo.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If i migrate the system database (model, master, temp) to another drive using the SMSQL, is it possible to leave the bases of users in Drive &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":anguished_face:"&gt;😧&lt;/span&gt; \?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;tks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:17:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>andre_columbia</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:17:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SMSQL with SQL System Root</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SMSQL-with-SQL-System-Root/m-p/27320#M9511</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Guys,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a customer with this configuration: Drive D:\, Drive L:\ and Drive R:\. The drive D:\ are the SQL System Root and Users Database, drive L:\ are the logs of all Databases and drive R:\ are to SnapInfo.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If i migrate the system database (model, master, temp) to another drive using the SMSQL, is it possible to leave the bases of users in Drive &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":anguished_face:"&gt;😧&lt;/span&gt; \?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;tks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:17:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SMSQL-with-SQL-System-Root/m-p/27320#M9511</guid>
      <dc:creator>andre_columbia</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:17:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SMSQL with SQL System Root</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SMSQL-with-SQL-System-Root/m-p/27324#M9512</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes that is absolutely possible and also the best practice. Ideally, SQL Server system and user databases should never co-exist on the same LUN.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sourav.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 04:28:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SMSQL-with-SQL-System-Root/m-p/27324#M9512</guid>
      <dc:creator>sourav</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-16T04:28:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SMSQL with SQL System Root</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SMSQL-with-SQL-System-Root/m-p/27329#M9513</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Sourav,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I will test and reply to you with the conclusion.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;tks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;André Dobrões&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 18:08:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SMSQL-with-SQL-System-Root/m-p/27329#M9513</guid>
      <dc:creator>andre_columbia</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-16T18:08:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

