<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic SM4SQL: possible to combine with SQL-Backup? in Data Protection</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SM4SQL-possible-to-combine-with-SQL-Backup/m-p/76332#M9650</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Community,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we are using an SQL 2008 x64 Standard with SMSQL (5.0 R1) - my question is, if&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;there is an known problem in using the SMSQL for example from 6 to 22 and the&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SQL-Standard-Backup from 23 to 5 o´clock? Exactly at this time i want to verify&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;some of the 16 Snapshots which the SMSQL did before...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;At the first time the SQL-Recovery-Mode will be set to "simple", so there is no&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;seperate backup of the T-LOG needed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for some information and your opinion&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Marc&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:27:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mhasenbeck</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:27:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SM4SQL: possible to combine with SQL-Backup?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SM4SQL-possible-to-combine-with-SQL-Backup/m-p/76332#M9650</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Community,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;we are using an SQL 2008 x64 Standard with SMSQL (5.0 R1) - my question is, if&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;there is an known problem in using the SMSQL for example from 6 to 22 and the&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SQL-Standard-Backup from 23 to 5 o´clock? Exactly at this time i want to verify&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;some of the 16 Snapshots which the SMSQL did before...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;At the first time the SQL-Recovery-Mode will be set to "simple", so there is no&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;seperate backup of the T-LOG needed.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for some information and your opinion&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Marc&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:27:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SM4SQL-possible-to-combine-with-SQL-Backup/m-p/76332#M9650</guid>
      <dc:creator>mhasenbeck</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:27:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SM4SQL: possible to combine with SQL-Backup?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SM4SQL-possible-to-combine-with-SQL-Backup/m-p/76335#M9651</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Marc,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you elaborate on the known problem with SMSQL between 0600 and 2200?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jeff &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 17:08:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SM4SQL-possible-to-combine-with-SQL-Backup/m-p/76335#M9651</guid>
      <dc:creator>jeffbennett</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-04-30T17:08:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

