<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: iSCSI and Fibre Channel on the same host in Data Protection</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/iSCSI-and-Fibre-Channel-on-the-same-host/m-p/3884#M9815</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hmm, why not SnapMirror volume(s) from old filer containing LUNs in question to a volume on a new filer? Then you can break the mirror &amp;amp; attach migrated LUNs via SnapDrive.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Radek&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:37:01 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>radek_kubka</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-01-13T11:37:01Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>iSCSI and Fibre Channel on the same host</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/iSCSI-and-Fibre-Channel-on-the-same-host/m-p/3881#M9814</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We currently have LUNs presented via iSCSI to two filers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We want to present LUNs to the same Windows host on two new filers via Fibre Channel&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SQL databases will then be migrated from the iSCSI LUNs to the Fibre Channel LUNs using Snapmanager for SQL&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can this be done?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If so how can I tell if the DSM was installed with both the iSCSI and Fibre Channel options?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:19:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/iSCSI-and-Fibre-Channel-on-the-same-host/m-p/3881#M9814</guid>
      <dc:creator>Willybobs27</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:19:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: iSCSI and Fibre Channel on the same host</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/iSCSI-and-Fibre-Channel-on-the-same-host/m-p/3884#M9815</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hmm, why not SnapMirror volume(s) from old filer containing LUNs in question to a volume on a new filer? Then you can break the mirror &amp;amp; attach migrated LUNs via SnapDrive.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Radek&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:37:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/iSCSI-and-Fibre-Channel-on-the-same-host/m-p/3884#M9815</guid>
      <dc:creator>radek_kubka</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-13T11:37:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: iSCSI and Fibre Channel on the same host</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/iSCSI-and-Fibre-Channel-on-the-same-host/m-p/3890#M9816</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;They are Windows 2000 Clusters so I think there will be an issue with disk signatures.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:39:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/iSCSI-and-Fibre-Channel-on-the-same-host/m-p/3890#M9816</guid>
      <dc:creator>Willybobs27</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-13T11:39:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: iSCSI and Fibre Channel on the same host</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/iSCSI-and-Fibre-Channel-on-the-same-host/m-p/3894#M9817</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Replicated LUNs will be identical as the original ones, including their signatures. I don't think Windows will attempt to re-signature them when attached to the host.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Why not try this out? Your original LUNs will remain intact all the time anyway.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;Radek&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 11:55:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/iSCSI-and-Fibre-Channel-on-the-same-host/m-p/3894#M9817</guid>
      <dc:creator>radek_kubka</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-13T11:55:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: iSCSI and Fibre Channel on the same host</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/iSCSI-and-Fibre-Channel-on-the-same-host/m-p/3898#M9818</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Because I have Mission Critical systems hosted and such a procedure wouldn't get through Change Control.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Unfortunately I don't have test infrastructure so I have to play this safe.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 12:04:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/iSCSI-and-Fibre-Channel-on-the-same-host/m-p/3898#M9818</guid>
      <dc:creator>Willybobs27</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-01-13T12:04:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

