<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: SMSQL verification server issue in Data Protection</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SMSQL-verification-server-issue/m-p/5402#M9967</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Bren and Andrew. This is helpful.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;DH&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 20:05:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>hempy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-09-29T20:05:19Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SMSQL verification server issue</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SMSQL-verification-server-issue/m-p/5382#M9964</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #000000; font-size: 12pt; sans-serif&amp;amp;quot: ; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; Arial&amp;amp;quot: ; ,&amp;amp;quot: ; "&gt;Has anyone run into this before? From a partner SE:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 12pt; color: #000000; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;I was going to ask if he's encountered the behavior that Active are seeing with their SnapManager for SQL verification server.&amp;nbsp; Support wants them to reinstall or upgrade SnapDrive and SnapManager, but they're trying to avoid downtime if possible.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The verification server config is just acting very strange.&amp;nbsp; It's not saving configuration settings or changes.&amp;nbsp; It will also report (intermittently) that the versions of SnapManager on the prod and verification servers are different (they're not).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 12pt; color: #000000; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;"&gt;Dave&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:23:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SMSQL-verification-server-issue/m-p/5382#M9964</guid>
      <dc:creator>hempy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:23:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SMSQL verification server issue</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SMSQL-verification-server-issue/m-p/5387#M9965</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes we had it in our site after upgrading to SD 6.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One of the Windows hot fixes had been missed off the install.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Go back and confirm everything has been installed as per the pre reqs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Bren&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 10:18:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SMSQL-verification-server-issue/m-p/5387#M9965</guid>
      <dc:creator>BrendonHiggins</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-09-27T10:18:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SMSQL verification server issue</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SMSQL-verification-server-issue/m-p/5395#M9966</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;And...if getting a runaround (or seems like you are), can always ask for the duty manager.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Having said that, very good suggestion on the hotfixes -- verifying stuff off the compat matrix can be somewhat helpful there too (iSCSI initiator version, Host Utilities version, all applicable hotfixes, etc.).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 02:42:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SMSQL-verification-server-issue/m-p/5395#M9966</guid>
      <dc:creator>amiller_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-09-28T02:42:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SMSQL verification server issue</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SMSQL-verification-server-issue/m-p/5402#M9967</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Bren and Andrew. This is helpful.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;DH&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 20:05:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/SMSQL-verification-server-issue/m-p/5402#M9967</guid>
      <dc:creator>hempy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-09-29T20:05:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

