<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: MSSQL and Exchange DB in the same aggregate ? in Data Protection</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/MSSQL-and-Exchange-DB-in-the-same-aggregate/m-p/74851#M9970</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sure you can, and we have many customers that do.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The bottom line is your SLA.&amp;nbsp; If you are not 100% Outlook cached mode, blips in latency (above 20ms) for the Exchange DB or (above 5-10ms) transaction logs will cause end users to have to wait (OWA/mobile), or cause an Outlook popup (online mode). &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To prevent this, you want to understand your SQL IO, and size appropriately. (Don't run huge SQL batch jobs in the middle of the work day, etc).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;FlexShare can be used to prioritize the Exchange volumes over the SQL ones.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Robert&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:32:12 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>quimbey</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-09-30T17:32:12Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>MSSQL and Exchange DB in the same aggregate ?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/MSSQL-and-Exchange-DB-in-the-same-aggregate/m-p/74843#M9968</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Small question, is there any problem having 1 volume for MSSQL and another volume to host Exchange PF in the SAME aggregate ? We are using FC disks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:29:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/MSSQL-and-Exchange-DB-in-the-same-aggregate/m-p/74843#M9968</guid>
      <dc:creator>itebu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:29:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MSSQL and Exchange DB in the same aggregate ?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/MSSQL-and-Exchange-DB-in-the-same-aggregate/m-p/74847#M9969</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi -- Moving this thread over to the Ask the Expert discussion happening this week (Sept 28-Oct 2).&amp;nbsp; Our experts are ready!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Terri&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:18:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/MSSQL-and-Exchange-DB-in-the-same-aggregate/m-p/74847#M9969</guid>
      <dc:creator>peluso</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-09-30T17:18:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MSSQL and Exchange DB in the same aggregate ?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/MSSQL-and-Exchange-DB-in-the-same-aggregate/m-p/74851#M9970</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sure you can, and we have many customers that do.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The bottom line is your SLA.&amp;nbsp; If you are not 100% Outlook cached mode, blips in latency (above 20ms) for the Exchange DB or (above 5-10ms) transaction logs will cause end users to have to wait (OWA/mobile), or cause an Outlook popup (online mode). &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To prevent this, you want to understand your SQL IO, and size appropriately. (Don't run huge SQL batch jobs in the middle of the work day, etc).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;FlexShare can be used to prioritize the Exchange volumes over the SQL ones.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Robert&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:32:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/Data-Protection/MSSQL-and-Exchange-DB-in-the-same-aggregate/m-p/74851#M9970</guid>
      <dc:creator>quimbey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-09-30T17:32:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

