<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: FlexShare - impact on volumes? in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/FlexShare-impact-on-volumes/m-p/48668#M11421</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;There's no service interruption by setting FlexShare settings.&amp;nbsp; Of course the priority of volumes will change (on the fly), but one of the points of the product is to never starve a volume regardless of it's priority.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 21:12:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>adamfox</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-07-14T21:12:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>FlexShare - impact on volumes?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/FlexShare-impact-on-volumes/m-p/48663#M11420</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello!&amp;nbsp; I must enable FlexShare on our NetApp 3170 (OnTap 7.3.2).&amp;nbsp; Does anyone know if enabling FlexShare (&lt;EM&gt;priority on&lt;/EM&gt;) or setting volume priorities (&lt;EM&gt;priority set volume vol_name level=High&lt;/EM&gt;) will cause any interruption to the volume's operation?&amp;nbsp; Will there be any volume downtime or bump?&amp;nbsp; The OnTap 7.3 Sys Admin Guide doesn't say one way or another.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;TinaS&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:12:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/FlexShare-impact-on-volumes/m-p/48663#M11420</guid>
      <dc:creator>tina_swenson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:12:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FlexShare - impact on volumes?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/FlexShare-impact-on-volumes/m-p/48668#M11421</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;There's no service interruption by setting FlexShare settings.&amp;nbsp; Of course the priority of volumes will change (on the fly), but one of the points of the product is to never starve a volume regardless of it's priority.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 21:12:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/FlexShare-impact-on-volumes/m-p/48668#M11421</guid>
      <dc:creator>adamfox</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-14T21:12:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FlexShare - impact on volumes?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/FlexShare-impact-on-volumes/m-p/48672#M11422</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;One thing to be careful about is that after you enable flexshare, all volumes which have not had their priority explicitly set will all share a default queue or bucket (this is covered in the flexshare best practices guide which you should check out)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In most cases this is absolutely fine, however there are situations with very heavily loaded controllers that a volume which has its priority set to low or very low may actually get more resources allocated to it than the volumes in the default bucket.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is because once a volume has a priority explicitly set for it, it get's its own queue, its only those volumes which dont have an explicit priority set that have to share their queue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I personally feel that if you've enabled flexshare, that you should ensure that all new volumes are assigned a priority as standard. Unfortunatley this isnt part of provisioning manager today, however a failry straigthforward script could be created that detects volumes in the default queue and add give them a medium priority.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;John&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 12:41:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/FlexShare-impact-on-volumes/m-p/48672#M11422</guid>
      <dc:creator>rickymartin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-15T12:41:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FlexShare - impact on volumes?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/FlexShare-impact-on-volumes/m-p/48676#M11423</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Excellent.  I’ve heard of that warning as well.  My plan is to set FlexShare volume priority on all volumes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the reply!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tina&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 15:45:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/FlexShare-impact-on-volumes/m-p/48676#M11423</guid>
      <dc:creator>tina_swenson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-15T15:45:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

