<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Deduplication of a SnapVault destination in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Deduplication-of-a-SnapVault-destination/m-p/48943#M11471</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Chris,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In regards to your comment about Storage Efficiency only being able to be set as Manual. Are you referring to within the OnCommand interface? I am looking at enabling Deduplication on our Snapvault volumes as well and was curious about this step. Does it list in OnCommand as Manual and then kick off a dedupe run after a SV update but it still shows as Manual within the OnCommand interface?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2013 06:15:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ANTHONYWINTER</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-07-04T06:15:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Deduplication of a SnapVault destination</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Deduplication-of-a-SnapVault-destination/m-p/48920#M11459</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I wonder if anyone can help?&amp;nbsp; I've been doing a bit of reading up on the potential for space savings if I switch on deduplication on a SnapVault target.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The source volume is question is mainly Microsft Office type documents and would therefore benefit greatly from SIS.&amp;nbsp; Actually, we do dedupe the source volume but as I understand it, any benefit is lost in the snapvaulting process.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Most of the advise recommends that SIS is enable prior to the first snapshot being taken.&amp;nbsp; Unfortunately we've missed the boat on this and the peculiar nature of this volume means we retains snapvault snapshots up to one year old.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can anyone confirm that:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;a) We can retrospecitively enable SIS on the SnapVault destination.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;b) How long will it be before we start to see a benefit (I suspect we won't see anything until the older snapshots begin to expire).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;c) How much free space am I likely to need to perform this?&amp;nbsp; Am I likely to see much growth in the volume during the SIS START process?&amp;nbsp; The snapvault target volume is 3TB in size with 2.5TB in use (about 1.5TB is current data and 1TB is SV snapshots.)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Help appreciated!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Richard&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:14:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Deduplication-of-a-SnapVault-destination/m-p/48920#M11459</guid>
      <dc:creator>richardjj</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:14:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Deduplication of a SnapVault destination</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Deduplication-of-a-SnapVault-destination/m-p/48925#M11462</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Forget to mention, we are running OnTap 7.3.7.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 13:10:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Deduplication-of-a-SnapVault-destination/m-p/48925#M11462</guid>
      <dc:creator>richardjj</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-11-27T13:10:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Deduplication of a SnapVault destination</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Deduplication-of-a-SnapVault-destination/m-p/48930#M11465</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Richard,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Did you ever get an answer to this question?&amp;nbsp; You've described the exact same question I was going to post.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have dedupe enabled at the source but not at the destination.&amp;nbsp; I have enabled dedupe and forced a manual scan but all it seems to have done is placed all of the potential savings in to a 400gb snap which I guess will be there for another 12 months now!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've also noticed that there is any way to set the storage efficiency to be automatic, even after the dedupe completes.&amp;nbsp; I'm finding it difficult to get a clear answer on this!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 00:18:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Deduplication-of-a-SnapVault-destination/m-p/48930#M11465</guid>
      <dc:creator>CHRIS_EMMETT</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-03T00:18:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Deduplication of a SnapVault destination</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Deduplication-of-a-SnapVault-destination/m-p/48935#M11467</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;a) Yes you can enable it at any time.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;b) Your suspicion is correct. You will only start to see big benefits once all pre-dedup snapshots have expired.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;c) Difficult to say. You will really need the extra space for the big snapshot(s) until the pre-dedup snapshots expire. Once you've got a couple of snapshots going on the destination volume, you will have dedup benefits on those snapshots, but they will not compensate for the pre-dedup snapshots.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 10:15:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Deduplication-of-a-SnapVault-destination/m-p/48935#M11467</guid>
      <dc:creator>uptimenow</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-03T10:15:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Deduplication of a SnapVault destination</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Deduplication-of-a-SnapVault-destination/m-p/48940#M11469</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am not quite sure what you mean by that last comment about storage efficiency. On a SnapVault destination with dedup enabled, you will get automatic dedup runs after SV updates. Doesn't that qualify "storage efficiency to be automatic" ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 03 Mar 2013 10:17:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Deduplication-of-a-SnapVault-destination/m-p/48940#M11469</guid>
      <dc:creator>uptimenow</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-03T10:17:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Deduplication of a SnapVault destination</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Deduplication-of-a-SnapVault-destination/m-p/48943#M11471</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Chris,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In regards to your comment about Storage Efficiency only being able to be set as Manual. Are you referring to within the OnCommand interface? I am looking at enabling Deduplication on our Snapvault volumes as well and was curious about this step. Does it list in OnCommand as Manual and then kick off a dedupe run after a SV update but it still shows as Manual within the OnCommand interface?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2013 06:15:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Deduplication-of-a-SnapVault-destination/m-p/48943#M11471</guid>
      <dc:creator>ANTHONYWINTER</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-07-04T06:15:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Deduplication of a SnapVault destination</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Deduplication-of-a-SnapVault-destination/m-p/48948#M11473</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have come across the same situation as well. I have read these documents related to snapvault and dedupe'. It seems safe to me and as&amp;nbsp; "uptime" stated above in his comments in summary has hit the nail on the head.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Of course if in doubt open a case with NetApp.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.netapp.com/us/media/tr-3505.pdf" title="http://www.netapp.com/us/media/tr-3505.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.netapp.com/us/media/tr-3505.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;see section 6.2.5 SNAPVAULT&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The behavior of deduplication with SnapVault is similar to the behavior with qtree SnapMirror, except for&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the following points: etc...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.netapp.com/us/media/tr-3487.pdf" title="http://www.netapp.com/us/media/tr-3487.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.netapp.com/us/media/tr-3487.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Jeff&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2014 16:52:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Deduplication-of-a-SnapVault-destination/m-p/48948#M11473</guid>
      <dc:creator>DRUMDUDESAN</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-01-21T16:52:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

