<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic High CPU-load - caused by &amp;quot;Ignoring stale resume trigger&amp;quot;? in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/High-CPU-load-caused-by-quot-Ignoring-stale-resume-trigger-quot/m-p/51662#M12133</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi there,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I recently saw very high CPU load (around 90%) coupled with high disk utilization of between 65-90% on one node of a clustered FAS2040 system.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The nodes are simple snapvault destinations and are not serving any data, and since no deduplication and only two snapvault transfers were running I couldn't figure out why the system was under so much load.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Performance graphs of the system showed that it normally just trotted along at 2-3% CPU utilization, but since 08:00 this morning it had started having very high load instead.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I checked the logs on the filer, not finding anything suspicious in messages or any other, except for the etc/log/volread log. It showed lines like the following, several each second:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Wed Jan 25 08:00:22 CET Ignoring stale resume trigger (Backup UUID 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Wed Jan 25 08:00:36 CET Ignoring stale resume trigger (Backup UUID 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Wed Jan 25 08:00:36 CET Ignoring stale resume trigger (Backup UUID 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Wed Jan 25 08:00:36 CET Ignoring stale resume trigger (Backup UUID 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;lt;cut&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Wed Jan 25 11:53:14 CET Ignoring stale resume trigger (Backup UUID 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Wed Jan 25 11:53:14 CET Ignoring stale resume trigger (Backup UUID 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Wed Jan 25 11:53:16 CET Ignoring stale resume trigger (Backup UUID 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Wed Jan 25 11:53:16 CET Ignoring stale resume trigger (Backup UUID 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Wed Jan 25 11:53:16 CET Ignoring stale resume trigger (Backup UUID 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;These are the first and last entries in that log (of a total of 105321 lines!), and indeed the system now seems back to normal after 12:00.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Has anyone seen anything like this before? Could it happen again? This is an 8.0.2P3 7-mode release I might add.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks and best regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Peter&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:36:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PROACTPETER</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:36:39Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>High CPU-load - caused by "Ignoring stale resume trigger"?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/High-CPU-load-caused-by-quot-Ignoring-stale-resume-trigger-quot/m-p/51662#M12133</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi there,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I recently saw very high CPU load (around 90%) coupled with high disk utilization of between 65-90% on one node of a clustered FAS2040 system.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The nodes are simple snapvault destinations and are not serving any data, and since no deduplication and only two snapvault transfers were running I couldn't figure out why the system was under so much load.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Performance graphs of the system showed that it normally just trotted along at 2-3% CPU utilization, but since 08:00 this morning it had started having very high load instead.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I checked the logs on the filer, not finding anything suspicious in messages or any other, except for the etc/log/volread log. It showed lines like the following, several each second:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Wed Jan 25 08:00:22 CET Ignoring stale resume trigger (Backup UUID 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Wed Jan 25 08:00:36 CET Ignoring stale resume trigger (Backup UUID 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Wed Jan 25 08:00:36 CET Ignoring stale resume trigger (Backup UUID 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Wed Jan 25 08:00:36 CET Ignoring stale resume trigger (Backup UUID 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;lt;cut&amp;gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Wed Jan 25 11:53:14 CET Ignoring stale resume trigger (Backup UUID 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Wed Jan 25 11:53:14 CET Ignoring stale resume trigger (Backup UUID 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Wed Jan 25 11:53:16 CET Ignoring stale resume trigger (Backup UUID 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Wed Jan 25 11:53:16 CET Ignoring stale resume trigger (Backup UUID 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Wed Jan 25 11:53:16 CET Ignoring stale resume trigger (Backup UUID 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;These are the first and last entries in that log (of a total of 105321 lines!), and indeed the system now seems back to normal after 12:00.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Has anyone seen anything like this before? Could it happen again? This is an 8.0.2P3 7-mode release I might add.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks and best regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Peter&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:36:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/High-CPU-load-caused-by-quot-Ignoring-stale-resume-trigger-quot/m-p/51662#M12133</guid>
      <dc:creator>PROACTPETER</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:36:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: High CPU-load - caused by "Ignoring stale resume trigger"?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/High-CPU-load-caused-by-quot-Ignoring-stale-resume-trigger-quot/m-p/51666#M12134</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since you have not gotten an answer, you may want to ask this question in the &lt;A href="https://forums.netapp.com/community/support" target="_blank"&gt;NetApp Support Community.&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp; The current customers, partners and internal Subject Matter Experts are addressing technical product questions there.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mike&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:51:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/High-CPU-load-caused-by-quot-Ignoring-stale-resume-trigger-quot/m-p/51666#M12134</guid>
      <dc:creator>crocker</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-01-31T15:51:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

