<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ontap 8.0.2 in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/ontap-8-0-2/m-p/52676#M12306</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I just upgraded to 8.0.2 and did some reading up on 64bit aggregates!&amp;nbsp; I wanted to migrate to 64bit, but it seems the root aggregate and volume need to remain on 32 bit.&amp;nbsp; I'm fairly new to netapp and i've always learned to keep the root aggregate in aggr0 and also continue to use aggr0 for other volumes as well.&amp;nbsp; If want to upgrade to 64 bit aggregates and volumes, it seems as though I would have to "waste" 3 disks for a 32 bit aggr0 and the root voume and create 64 bit aggregates for everythign else.&amp;nbsp; It is also annoying I can only use ndmp copy to copy informatin to the new volumes rather than do a volcopy as there is a limitaion taht prevents from copying from 32bit aggr to 64bit agg. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In any case, Does netapp have a best practice for where to where to keep the root volume, in it's own aggregate or shared with other volumes?&amp;nbsp; I am curious to know what everyone else does.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; IMO, it seems like a waste of expensive disks to use only 3 for root aggr. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:39:08 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>sninan</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:39:08Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ontap 8.0.2</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/ontap-8-0-2/m-p/52676#M12306</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I just upgraded to 8.0.2 and did some reading up on 64bit aggregates!&amp;nbsp; I wanted to migrate to 64bit, but it seems the root aggregate and volume need to remain on 32 bit.&amp;nbsp; I'm fairly new to netapp and i've always learned to keep the root aggregate in aggr0 and also continue to use aggr0 for other volumes as well.&amp;nbsp; If want to upgrade to 64 bit aggregates and volumes, it seems as though I would have to "waste" 3 disks for a 32 bit aggr0 and the root voume and create 64 bit aggregates for everythign else.&amp;nbsp; It is also annoying I can only use ndmp copy to copy informatin to the new volumes rather than do a volcopy as there is a limitaion taht prevents from copying from 32bit aggr to 64bit agg. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In any case, Does netapp have a best practice for where to where to keep the root volume, in it's own aggregate or shared with other volumes?&amp;nbsp; I am curious to know what everyone else does.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; IMO, it seems like a waste of expensive disks to use only 3 for root aggr. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:39:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/ontap-8-0-2/m-p/52676#M12306</guid>
      <dc:creator>sninan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:39:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ontap 8.0.2</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/ontap-8-0-2/m-p/52681#M12310</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Root on 64 bit is supported since 8.0.1.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 20:11:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/ontap-8-0-2/m-p/52681#M12310</guid>
      <dc:creator>aborzenkov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-12-21T20:11:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ontap 8.0.2</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/ontap-8-0-2/m-p/52685#M12313</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;ha! there goes my rant!&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 14:04:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/ontap-8-0-2/m-p/52685#M12313</guid>
      <dc:creator>sninan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-12-22T14:04:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

