<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: SnapMirror Replication Size with Dedupe in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapMirror-Replication-Size-with-Dedupe/m-p/52715#M12328</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Chris,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;if you are using VOLUME SnapMirror, you Volume will be transfered block by block in its deduped state (thus saving bandwith) and you do not need to dedup it at secondary.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you are using QTREE SnapMirror and/or SnapVault, it will be transfered file based, thus the complete undeduped files will be transfered and you need to dedup at the secondary again.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kind regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thomas &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 16:02:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>thomas_glodde</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-11-15T16:02:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SnapMirror Replication Size with Dedupe</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapMirror-Replication-Size-with-Dedupe/m-p/52711#M12325</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello everyone,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So I have a customer that is Snapmirroring between site A and site B, its a T1 and we are trying to reconcile the amount of data being replicated.&amp;nbsp; They are running 7.3.2 at both sites, 3140 at primary and 2040 at secondary.&amp;nbsp; Dedupe running at primary.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If we add up the snapshots between replication cycles, its about 25% (sometimes even less) of what snapmirror is reporting.&amp;nbsp; Looked at Kb vs KB, etc, can't correlate where its coming from.&amp;nbsp; The one thing I found is that as of 7.3, meta data associated with dedupe is at the aggr level, not within the volume itself.&amp;nbsp; And in the online backup guide it says that you should dedupe the secondary as well as the primary.&amp;nbsp; So does this mean that hydration is happening with Snapmirror replication?&amp;nbsp; And that's why its showing larger then what's inside of the snapshots?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any assistance would be appreciated, thanks everyone!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Chris&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:05:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapMirror-Replication-Size-with-Dedupe/m-p/52711#M12325</guid>
      <dc:creator>highvailsys</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:05:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SnapMirror Replication Size with Dedupe</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapMirror-Replication-Size-with-Dedupe/m-p/52715#M12328</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Chris,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;if you are using VOLUME SnapMirror, you Volume will be transfered block by block in its deduped state (thus saving bandwith) and you do not need to dedup it at secondary.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you are using QTREE SnapMirror and/or SnapVault, it will be transfered file based, thus the complete undeduped files will be transfered and you need to dedup at the secondary again.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kind regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thomas &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 16:02:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapMirror-Replication-Size-with-Dedupe/m-p/52715#M12328</guid>
      <dc:creator>thomas_glodde</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-11-15T16:02:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SnapMirror Replication Size with Dedupe</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapMirror-Replication-Size-with-Dedupe/m-p/52720#M12330</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sorry, should have mentioned, I'm using Volume Snapmirror.&amp;nbsp; I agree that is should replicate deduped data, but according to the online backup manual, as of 7.3 dedupe savings are not included in replication, excerpt from page 111;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV id="_mcePaste"&gt;Starting with Data ONTAP 7.3 and onward, the deduplication metadata for a volume is placed outside&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV id="_mcePaste"&gt;the volume, at the aggregate level. This can improve the space savings achieved through the use of&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV id="_mcePaste"&gt;deduplication.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt; &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV id="_mcePaste"&gt;When replicating data using volume SnapMirror, the deduplication metadata for the volume is not&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV id="_mcePaste"&gt;replicated along with the volume. The data in the volume is usable both on the source and the destination.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt; &lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV id="_mcePaste"&gt;To achieve maximum space savings on the destination volume, scan the entire file system to recreate&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV id="_mcePaste"&gt;the deduplication metadata for the destination volume. Use the sis start -s command to do so.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So with this in mind, is this why there's a difference in the size of my replications versus what's in snapshots?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Chris&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 16:12:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapMirror-Replication-Size-with-Dedupe/m-p/52720#M12330</guid>
      <dc:creator>highvailsys</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-11-15T16:12:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

