<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: aggregate for 2 shelves in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/aggregate-for-2-shelves/m-p/55043#M12880</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mathias,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; Normally, it's highly recommended that you have a single aggregate dedicated to the root volume.&amp;nbsp; In some cases, where you never plan on having more than a shelf or two, that's a big waste.&amp;nbsp; If you don't plan on adding a lot more disk to your controllers, it makes more sense to expand aggr0 and have only one aggregate per controller.&amp;nbsp; If you will be adding more disks over time, leave aggr0 alone and create a second one with your remaining disks.&amp;nbsp; Make sure and leave at least one hot spare disk per shelf.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Per the Storage Management Guide:&amp;nbsp; &lt;A href="https://library.netapp.com/ecm/ecm_download_file/ECMP1141781" target="_blank"&gt;https://library.netapp.com/ecm/ecm_download_file/ECMP1141781&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You should size your Raid Groups between 12 and 28 (recommended between 12 and 20), with all RGs being as close to the same size as possible.&amp;nbsp; With what you have, assuming I would not be expanding again anytime soon or with very many disks, I would do the following:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1 shelf per controller.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1 aggregate per shelf, size 23 disks (1 hot spare).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Raid Group size 12 (1 RG size 12, 1 RG size 11).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Decide what best fits your needs but these guidelines should help (I hope) &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.netapp.com/5.0.1/images/emoticons/happy.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 15:08:41 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>bsti</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-08T15:08:41Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>aggregate for 2 shelves</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/aggregate-for-2-shelves/m-p/55036#M12875</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Got two 2246 shelves with 24*900GB SAS and two controllers&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Should I put all the disks under one aggregate that is root and has a disk count of 3 or should I create a new one and leave the root alone?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If i create a new one I do a disk count of 18 and then have 3 hotspares for that aggregate? And best practice for raid group sice is then? If I in the future whant to upgrade with another shelf....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;18*900*0,8 and with dedup *2 = 25920 / shelf&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;tips and trix please &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":grinning_face_with_big_eyes:"&gt;😃&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:03:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/aggregate-for-2-shelves/m-p/55036#M12875</guid>
      <dc:creator>MISTERMAT</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:03:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: aggregate for 2 shelves</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/aggregate-for-2-shelves/m-p/55043#M12880</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mathias,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; Normally, it's highly recommended that you have a single aggregate dedicated to the root volume.&amp;nbsp; In some cases, where you never plan on having more than a shelf or two, that's a big waste.&amp;nbsp; If you don't plan on adding a lot more disk to your controllers, it makes more sense to expand aggr0 and have only one aggregate per controller.&amp;nbsp; If you will be adding more disks over time, leave aggr0 alone and create a second one with your remaining disks.&amp;nbsp; Make sure and leave at least one hot spare disk per shelf.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Per the Storage Management Guide:&amp;nbsp; &lt;A href="https://library.netapp.com/ecm/ecm_download_file/ECMP1141781" target="_blank"&gt;https://library.netapp.com/ecm/ecm_download_file/ECMP1141781&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You should size your Raid Groups between 12 and 28 (recommended between 12 and 20), with all RGs being as close to the same size as possible.&amp;nbsp; With what you have, assuming I would not be expanding again anytime soon or with very many disks, I would do the following:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1 shelf per controller.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1 aggregate per shelf, size 23 disks (1 hot spare).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Raid Group size 12 (1 RG size 12, 1 RG size 11).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Decide what best fits your needs but these guidelines should help (I hope) &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy" __jive_macro_name="emoticon" class="jive_macro jive_emote" src="https://community.netapp.com/5.0.1/images/emoticons/happy.gif"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 15:08:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/aggregate-for-2-shelves/m-p/55043#M12880</guid>
      <dc:creator>bsti</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-05-08T15:08:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

