<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Static multimode interface throughput in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Static-multimode-interface-throughput/m-p/55175#M12922</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is a FAS2040A running with Data ONTAP 8.0.1RC3.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We config e0a, e0b, e0c, e0d with static multimode interface thourghput into a single ifgrp.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Each e0X is GbE interface.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What the throughput of ifgrp should be? 4Gb or 2Gb?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cuz we heard that Data ONTAP use 2 interfaces for inbound and the other 2 interfaces for outbound,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(we did a test the result shows the throughput more like 2Gb.) &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If this is ture? have any document to talk about this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Or the ifgrp should have 4Gb throughput?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:01:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>stijefflai</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:01:19Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Static multimode interface throughput</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Static-multimode-interface-throughput/m-p/55175#M12922</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is a FAS2040A running with Data ONTAP 8.0.1RC3.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We config e0a, e0b, e0c, e0d with static multimode interface thourghput into a single ifgrp.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Each e0X is GbE interface.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What the throughput of ifgrp should be? 4Gb or 2Gb?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cuz we heard that Data ONTAP use 2 interfaces for inbound and the other 2 interfaces for outbound,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(we did a test the result shows the throughput more like 2Gb.) &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If this is ture? have any document to talk about this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Or the ifgrp should have 4Gb throughput?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:01:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Static-multimode-interface-throughput/m-p/55175#M12922</guid>
      <dc:creator>stijefflai</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:01:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Static multimode interface throughput</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Static-multimode-interface-throughput/m-p/55179#M12924</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; I think it depends on how your switches are configured.&amp;nbsp; Basically what you are creating here is a network trunk and all interfaces will work as one interface giving you higher throughput.&amp;nbsp; Therefore your assumption of a 4GB connection is correct if your switches meet the IEEE 802.3ad standard for LACP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is what our documentation says about static multimode interfaces:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"The static multimode interface group implementation in&amp;nbsp; Data ONTAP is in compliance with IEEE 802.3ad (static). Any switch&amp;nbsp; that supports aggregates, but does not have control packet exchange for&amp;nbsp; configuring an aggregate, can be used with static multimode interface&amp;nbsp; groups."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"A static multimode interface group requires a switch that supports&amp;nbsp; link aggregation over multiple switch ports. The switch is configured so that&amp;nbsp; all ports to which links of an interface group are connected are&amp;nbsp; part of a single logical port. Some switches might not support link aggregation&amp;nbsp; of ports configured for jumbo frames. For more information, see your switch&amp;nbsp; vendor's documentation."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If "Interfaces e0, e1, e2, and e3 are part of the MultiTrunk1 multimode&amp;nbsp; interface group. All four interfaces in the MultiTrunk1 multimode&amp;nbsp; interface group are active."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"You can use round-robin for load balancing multimode interface&amp;nbsp; groups. You should use the round-robin option for load balancing a single&amp;nbsp; connection's traffic across multiple links to increase single connection&amp;nbsp; throughput. However, this method might cause out-of-order packet delivery.&amp;nbsp; If the remote TCP endpoints do not handle TCP reassembly correctly or lack&amp;nbsp; enough memory to store out-of-order packets, they might be forced to drop&amp;nbsp; packets. Therefore, this can lead to unnecessary retransmissions from the&amp;nbsp; storage controller"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is a few links to the documentation I reference:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://now.netapp.com/NOW/knowledge/docs/ontap/rel80/html/ontap/nag/GUID-E976D166-4F8D-4A9B-88CE-5E4091BFAE1A.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://now.netapp.com/NOW/knowledge/docs/ontap/rel80/html/ontap/nag/GUID-E976D166-4F8D-4A9B-88CE-5E4091BFAE1A.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://now.netapp.com/NOW/knowledge/docs/ontap/rel80/html/ontap/nag/GUID-1BC0DA4C-3C5F-49D6-8A57-7C0EBB60AD73.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://now.netapp.com/NOW/knowledge/docs/ontap/rel80/html/ontap/nag/GUID-1BC0DA4C-3C5F-49D6-8A57-7C0EBB60AD73.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 21:22:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Static-multimode-interface-throughput/m-p/55179#M12924</guid>
      <dc:creator>maske</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-02-02T21:22:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

