<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: upgrade from 32 bit to 64 bit aggregate/volumes with flexclone space savings intact in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/upgrade-from-32-bit-to-64-bit-aggregate-volumes-with-flexclone-space-savings/m-p/58421#M13724</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The rumours are, future Data ONTAP versions (I have heard about 8.1) will enable 32 =&amp;gt; 64 bit conversion in place. I expect in this case all volumes will be retained "as is" together with all space savings.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 20:07:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>aborzenkov</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-01-18T20:07:58Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>upgrade from 32 bit to 64 bit aggregate/volumes with flexclone space savings intact</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/upgrade-from-32-bit-to-64-bit-aggregate-volumes-with-flexclone-space-savings/m-p/58417#M13723</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have to ask this question separately in a new thread, because on other threads people jump into answering without reading the question first.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;OK, here are the conditions:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ONTAP 7.3.4 with 32 bit aggregates volumes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HEAVY use of file based flexcloning - on some volumes space savings exceed 70%. For example real data on a volume is 1TB and logical volume size is 8TB. We are already using &amp;gt;200% of usable capacity due to file based flexcloning.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Goal - migrate/upgrade the storage system to ONTAP 8.0.1/8.x.x with 64 bit aggregates/volumes WITH THE PRESERVATION of file based flexcloning savings.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Current methods - NDMP or QTS ARE NOT acceptable because they eliminate file based flexclone savings.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Question: WILL it be possible with upcoming releases of ONTAP? I know that NOW it is NOT possible.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:01:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/upgrade-from-32-bit-to-64-bit-aggregate-volumes-with-flexclone-space-savings/m-p/58417#M13723</guid>
      <dc:creator>irakli_natsvlishvili</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:01:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: upgrade from 32 bit to 64 bit aggregate/volumes with flexclone space savings intact</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/upgrade-from-32-bit-to-64-bit-aggregate-volumes-with-flexclone-space-savings/m-p/58421#M13724</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The rumours are, future Data ONTAP versions (I have heard about 8.1) will enable 32 =&amp;gt; 64 bit conversion in place. I expect in this case all volumes will be retained "as is" together with all space savings.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 20:07:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/upgrade-from-32-bit-to-64-bit-aggregate-volumes-with-flexclone-space-savings/m-p/58421#M13724</guid>
      <dc:creator>aborzenkov</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-01-18T20:07:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

