<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Future of OSSV in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Future-of-OSSV/m-p/60359#M14201</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;OSSV is not supporter by Clustered OnTap 8.2.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As I understand (to be confirmed), there is no roadmap for OSSV and it will be no longer supported.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Syncsort or SnapProtect will be probably the solution for backup Windows box or other third party storage.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 10:06:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>vemery999</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-15T10:06:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Future of OSSV</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Future-of-OSSV/m-p/60349#M14199</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm curious to understand what the roadmap of OSSV is with regards to ONTAP 8.2 Cluster Mode. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm concerned about supporting a plugin we had developed a while ago that uses OSSV under the covers. This is a 'Snap Manager style' plugin for a Windows desktop based Geoscience application by Schlumberger called Petrel. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:11:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Future-of-OSSV/m-p/60349#M14199</guid>
      <dc:creator>oqazi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:11:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Future of OSSV</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Future-of-OSSV/m-p/60354#M14200</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am interessed by the ossv future too. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does OSSV will be supported for Windows 2012 OS ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2013 13:49:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Future-of-OSSV/m-p/60354#M14200</guid>
      <dc:creator>xavierb</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-01-30T13:49:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Future of OSSV</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Future-of-OSSV/m-p/60359#M14201</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi, &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;OSSV is not supporter by Clustered OnTap 8.2.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As I understand (to be confirmed), there is no roadmap for OSSV and it will be no longer supported.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Syncsort or SnapProtect will be probably the solution for backup Windows box or other third party storage.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 10:06:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Future-of-OSSV/m-p/60359#M14201</guid>
      <dc:creator>vemery999</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-05-15T10:06:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Future of OSSV</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Future-of-OSSV/m-p/60365#M14204</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yep that seems to be the case.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SnapVault is support in clustered OnTap8.2 and OSSV will be supported in 7 mode…&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You may wish to confirm if snapprotect covers non netapp stored data in the way OSSV does.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Syncsort definitely does that, but is a very different solution and is really a backup solution that takes advantage of NetApp but doesn’t integrate with NetApp primary storage in the same way as the Snap software does.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 May 2013 11:40:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Future-of-OSSV/m-p/60365#M14204</guid>
      <dc:creator>paulstringfellow</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-05-15T11:40:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

