<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Protection Manager and SnapManager for SQL in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Protection-Manager-and-SnapManager-for-SQL/m-p/60378#M14208</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sure do.&amp;nbsp; In the SMSQL documentation the only integration I see mentioned is for SnapVault.&amp;nbsp; So does this mean without a SnapVault license I won't get a clean integration?&amp;nbsp; I really don't care to SnapVault this data anyway.&amp;nbsp; I just want to replicate it over the WAN.&amp;nbsp; I can do it manually, I can do it with SMSQL (Update Mirror options), and I can do it with Protection Manager, but the process seems really kludgy if it is relying on me to time my protection based on when I think the SMSQL jobs will finish.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 21:01:22 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>erick_moore</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-12-14T21:01:22Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Protection Manager and SnapManager for SQL</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Protection-Manager-and-SnapManager-for-SQL/m-p/60360#M14202</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;How are most people setting this up?&amp;nbsp; We have Protection Manager, and SnapManager for SQL, however we do not have a SnapVault license.&amp;nbsp; Are most people trying to time their protection manager settings to coincide with SMSQL backups?&amp;nbsp; i.e. You setup a nightly SMSQL backup at 2AM.&amp;nbsp; Do you then manually create a data set that includes all the SQL LUN's for that system, and set it up to snap and mirror to dr (as an example) at 3AM? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:20:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Protection-Manager-and-SnapManager-for-SQL/m-p/60360#M14202</guid>
      <dc:creator>erick_moore</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:20:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Protection Manager and SnapManager for SQL</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Protection-Manager-and-SnapManager-for-SQL/m-p/60364#M14203</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Erick,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AFAIK, you have to create a Application Dataset in Protection Manager(PM) from SM SQL.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So whenever SM SQL takes a backup(snapshot), it will register with the PM.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then as per the protection policy schedule, PM will copy the backup to the secondary storage system.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And yes you can go &amp;amp; edit the policy schedule in PM.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you manually create a dataset (DS) then I think PM will create local backups on the Primary which may not be application consistent.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This backup might not be good for restoring.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My 2 cents&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Prasad&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt; &lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 18:08:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Protection-Manager-and-SnapManager-for-SQL/m-p/60364#M14203</guid>
      <dc:creator>prasads</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-12-14T18:08:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Protection Manager and SnapManager for SQL</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Protection-Manager-and-SnapManager-for-SQL/m-p/60369#M14205</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The only option I get for PM in SMSQL is under the "Data Protection" step on the configuration wizard, and that is to setup an Archival Policy.&amp;nbsp; That requires a SV license which we don't have.&amp;nbsp; Is there some other way to do this that I am missing?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 19:14:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Protection-Manager-and-SnapManager-for-SQL/m-p/60369#M14205</guid>
      <dc:creator>erick_moore</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-12-14T19:14:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Protection Manager and SnapManager for SQL</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Protection-Manager-and-SnapManager-for-SQL/m-p/60373#M14206</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do you have a SM license?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 20:58:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Protection-Manager-and-SnapManager-for-SQL/m-p/60373#M14206</guid>
      <dc:creator>bmorse</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-12-14T20:58:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Protection Manager and SnapManager for SQL</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Protection-Manager-and-SnapManager-for-SQL/m-p/60378#M14208</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sure do.&amp;nbsp; In the SMSQL documentation the only integration I see mentioned is for SnapVault.&amp;nbsp; So does this mean without a SnapVault license I won't get a clean integration?&amp;nbsp; I really don't care to SnapVault this data anyway.&amp;nbsp; I just want to replicate it over the WAN.&amp;nbsp; I can do it manually, I can do it with SMSQL (Update Mirror options), and I can do it with Protection Manager, but the process seems really kludgy if it is relying on me to time my protection based on when I think the SMSQL jobs will finish.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 21:01:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Protection-Manager-and-SnapManager-for-SQL/m-p/60378#M14208</guid>
      <dc:creator>erick_moore</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-12-14T21:01:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Protection Manager and SnapManager for SQL</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Protection-Manager-and-SnapManager-for-SQL/m-p/60380#M14210</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Erick,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AFAIK, PM only supports SnapVault relationships or "Remote Backups".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 21:38:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Protection-Manager-and-SnapManager-for-SQL/m-p/60380#M14210</guid>
      <dc:creator>bmorse</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-12-14T21:38:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Protection Manager and SnapManager for SQL</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Protection-Manager-and-SnapManager-for-SQL/m-p/60385#M14212</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;PM doesn't support mirroring? I thought I read that it does? I have the same concerns with SME integration. I'd like to be able to use SME and PM to backup AND snapmirror my SME backups. Is this possible?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 19:14:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Protection-Manager-and-SnapManager-for-SQL/m-p/60385#M14212</guid>
      <dc:creator>ianaforbes</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-03-09T19:14:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

