<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Is it safe to use multiple LIF ips to access CIFS share in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Is-it-safe-to-use-multiple-LIF-ips-to-access-CIFS-share/m-p/62119#M14681</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are you still needing help in this? I've recently set up something similar as a test with a client and it works perfectly fine. The only thing to really keep in mind is direct I/O and contention over the cluster interconnect. It won't affect any failover methodology as long as your LIF failover groups are configured properly. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;For example, if HR hits a share on LIF1 and the data is on an aggregate hosted by the other Node (that the LIF is &lt;STRONG&gt;not&lt;/STRONG&gt; "homed" to), then the data will traverse the cluster interconnect. Might not be a big deal, but something to consider. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have you looked at NetApp's documentation for DNS Load Balancing on the cluster itself? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Source: &lt;A href="https://kb.netapp.com/support/index?page=content&amp;amp;id=1013801" title="https://kb.netapp.com/support/index?page=content&amp;amp;id=1013801" target="_blank"&gt;https://kb.netapp.com/support/index?page=content&amp;amp;id=1013801&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2014 04:25:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>NetApp_SEAL</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-08-27T04:25:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Is it safe to use multiple LIF ips to access CIFS share</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Is-it-safe-to-use-multiple-LIF-ips-to-access-CIFS-share/m-p/62114#M14679</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am using NetApp 8.2 Cluster Mode. I have configured 5 LIFs. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One of the LIF will be entered into the DNS server by NetApp.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I want to distribute the department-wise network traffic load on all LIFs. For this purpose I have created following entries in my DNS server&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;TABLE border="1" class="jiveBorder" height="101" style="border: 1px solid #000000; width: 843px;"&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TH style="text-align: center; background-color: #6690bc; color: #ffffff; padding: 2px;" valign="middle"&gt;Department&lt;/TH&gt;&lt;TH style="text-align: center; background-color: #6690bc; color: #ffffff; padding: 2px;" valign="middle"&gt;DNSName&lt;/TH&gt;&lt;TH style="text-align: center; background-color: #6690bc; color: #ffffff; padding: 2px;" valign="middle"&gt;IP ADDRESS&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/TH&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD style="padding: 2px;"&gt;HR&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD style="padding: 2px;"&gt;HRDept&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD style="padding: 2px;"&gt;LIF1 IP Address&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD style="padding: 2px;"&gt;Account&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD style="padding: 2px;"&gt;AccDept&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD style="padding: 2px;"&gt;LIF2 IP Address&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD style="padding: 2px;"&gt;Admin&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD style="padding: 2px;"&gt;AdminDept&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD style="padding: 2px;"&gt;LIF3 IP Address&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Every department will use its own DNSName to access the CIFS shares. It is working fine.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My question is , Is this configuration is safe to use. Does NetApp recommends such load balancing techniques ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Will it interfere in the NetApp's internal failover logic ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 05:41:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Is-it-safe-to-use-multiple-LIF-ips-to-access-CIFS-share/m-p/62114#M14679</guid>
      <dc:creator>SURESHDULANGE</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T05:41:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is it safe to use multiple LIF ips to access CIFS share</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Is-it-safe-to-use-multiple-LIF-ips-to-access-CIFS-share/m-p/62119#M14681</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are you still needing help in this? I've recently set up something similar as a test with a client and it works perfectly fine. The only thing to really keep in mind is direct I/O and contention over the cluster interconnect. It won't affect any failover methodology as long as your LIF failover groups are configured properly. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;For example, if HR hits a share on LIF1 and the data is on an aggregate hosted by the other Node (that the LIF is &lt;STRONG&gt;not&lt;/STRONG&gt; "homed" to), then the data will traverse the cluster interconnect. Might not be a big deal, but something to consider. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Have you looked at NetApp's documentation for DNS Load Balancing on the cluster itself? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Source: &lt;A href="https://kb.netapp.com/support/index?page=content&amp;amp;id=1013801" title="https://kb.netapp.com/support/index?page=content&amp;amp;id=1013801" target="_blank"&gt;https://kb.netapp.com/support/index?page=content&amp;amp;id=1013801&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2014 04:25:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/Is-it-safe-to-use-multiple-LIF-ips-to-access-CIFS-share/m-p/62119#M14681</guid>
      <dc:creator>NetApp_SEAL</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-08-27T04:25:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

