<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: SnapVault over FC in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapVault-over-FC/m-p/62286#M14722</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm not the product manager -- nor do I play one on TV -- but PVR's are always "considered", per se. If the scenario is compelling enough, anything is possible. &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Nevertheless, I have not seen this particular scenario supported because it is not a frequent request and when it is, there is not enough of a financial justification. Do note that a workaround for this is to use Protection Manager with preferred interfaces and QSM.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope that helps!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;--&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Michael L. Barrow&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Field Technical Lead - TESO&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Data Protection&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;NetApp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;+1.408.782.4249&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;barrow@netapp.com&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.netapp.com" target="_blank"&gt;www.netapp.com&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 03:58:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>barrow</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-11-24T03:58:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>SnapVault over FC</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapVault-over-FC/m-p/62281#M14719</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;IHAC that really prefers to leverage FC links for replication. As such the question has been raised if a PVR would be considered SnapVault using FC if raised. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:21:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapVault-over-FC/m-p/62281#M14719</guid>
      <dc:creator>byermann</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:21:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SnapVault over FC</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapVault-over-FC/m-p/62286#M14722</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm not the product manager -- nor do I play one on TV -- but PVR's are always "considered", per se. If the scenario is compelling enough, anything is possible. &lt;SPAN __jive_emoticon_name="happy"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Nevertheless, I have not seen this particular scenario supported because it is not a frequent request and when it is, there is not enough of a financial justification. Do note that a workaround for this is to use Protection Manager with preferred interfaces and QSM.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope that helps!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;--&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Michael L. Barrow&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Field Technical Lead - TESO&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Data Protection&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;NetApp&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;+1.408.782.4249&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;barrow@netapp.com&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.netapp.com" target="_blank"&gt;www.netapp.com&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 03:58:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapVault-over-FC/m-p/62286#M14722</guid>
      <dc:creator>barrow</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-11-24T03:58:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: SnapVault over FC</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapVault-over-FC/m-p/62295#M14727</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Would you be able to provide some detail with respect to the framework that would be required to make this possible?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:11:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/SnapVault-over-FC/m-p/62295#M14727</guid>
      <dc:creator>byermann</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-11-24T12:11:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

