<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: netapp snapprotect and commvault sympania 9 licensing/integration in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/netapp-snapprotect-and-commvault-sympania-9-licensing-integration/m-p/66103#M15514</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Economical and efficient is snap protect from netapp to netapp and backup client to netapp. Easy going, improved interface.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thank you,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AK G&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 19:11:01 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>AGUMADAVALLI</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-10-12T19:11:01Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>netapp snapprotect and commvault sympania 9 licensing/integration</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/netapp-snapprotect-and-commvault-sympania-9-licensing-integration/m-p/66074#M15498</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you run Commvault Sympania 9 in addition to NetApp SnapProtect in the same environment and "console."&amp;nbsp; The majority of our system are either virtualized or attached to our NetApp SAN, but we still have roughly 15 or so standalone systems that aren't connected to the SAN.&amp;nbsp; We are backing up roughly 18TB during our full backups (15TB of SAN data).&amp;nbsp; If we went with CS9, we would most likely purchase licenses by capacity, whereas the NetApp SP is licensed by controller.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;With either solution, should we purchase a NetApp array such as a 2200 series to be used as a B2D target?&amp;nbsp; I think you have to with NetApp SnapProtect but not with CS9.&amp;nbsp; Are there any advantages to using a NetApp array as a B2D target over non-NetApp array for B2D?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any other suggestions or advice is greatly appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 06:17:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/netapp-snapprotect-and-commvault-sympania-9-licensing-integration/m-p/66074#M15498</guid>
      <dc:creator>daniel_kaiser</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T06:17:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: netapp snapprotect and commvault sympania 9 licensing/integration</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/netapp-snapprotect-and-commvault-sympania-9-licensing-integration/m-p/66079#M15502</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;NetApp SnapProtect and Simpana are independent products with separate consoles.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You would want to use a NetApp array as a backup target, but you would want to leverage SnapVault here (and not just depend on traditional B2D).&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 16:54:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/netapp-snapprotect-and-commvault-sympania-9-licensing-integration/m-p/66079#M15502</guid>
      <dc:creator>bwood</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-10-11T16:54:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: netapp snapprotect and commvault sympania 9 licensing/integration</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/netapp-snapprotect-and-commvault-sympania-9-licensing-integration/m-p/66088#M15508</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are using commvault v9 with a different vendors SAN style devices.&amp;nbsp; commvault will dump data to any device that windows(in our case, not sure about *nix) can see.&amp;nbsp; we have an iSCSI connection to our targets and it works great.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i am currently not backing up our netapp devices with the Commvault SnapProtect product though.&amp;nbsp; But since commvault is injecting the information, i find it highly unlikely that they would require a netapp storage array for that use.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 20:21:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/netapp-snapprotect-and-commvault-sympania-9-licensing-integration/m-p/66088#M15508</guid>
      <dc:creator>DUSTIN_ROMAN</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-10-11T20:21:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: netapp snapprotect and commvault sympania 9 licensing/integration</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/netapp-snapprotect-and-commvault-sympania-9-licensing-integration/m-p/66093#M15511</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;There are several advantages to using the SnapProtect capability to protect NetApp data&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Accelerated backups - Snapshot based, application consistent backups without copy out based data movement with searchable file and application backup catalog and a much smaller backup footprint&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Super fast&amp;nbsp; recovery -&amp;nbsp; Granular recoveries from Snapshot backups along with unique capabilities like Array based restores (Single File Snap Restores) for NAS files and VMDKs &lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Efficient Replication&amp;nbsp; -&amp;nbsp; Seamless workflows to replicate backups efficiently using&amp;nbsp; SnapMirror and SnapVault&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Multi-use of backups - Backups are in native-format enabling multi-use of backup copies to support test/dev, analytics etc&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 18:58:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/netapp-snapprotect-and-commvault-sympania-9-licensing-integration/m-p/66093#M15511</guid>
      <dc:creator>sunderp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-10-12T18:58:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: netapp snapprotect and commvault sympania 9 licensing/integration</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/netapp-snapprotect-and-commvault-sympania-9-licensing-integration/m-p/66103#M15514</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Economical and efficient is snap protect from netapp to netapp and backup client to netapp. Easy going, improved interface.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thank you,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AK G&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 19:11:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/netapp-snapprotect-and-commvault-sympania-9-licensing-integration/m-p/66103#M15514</guid>
      <dc:creator>AGUMADAVALLI</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-10-12T19:11:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

