<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: FAS 3140 performance issue? in ONTAP Discussions</title>
    <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/FAS-3140-performance-issue/m-p/67361#M15699</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;latency - try this&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;from console type:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;stats show -i 10 volume:VOLume_NAME:read_latency volume:VOLUME_NAME:Write_latency&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(VOLUME NAME - just change name )&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-i 10 - time periot between test in sec.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;results:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Read_latency / Write_latency&amp;nbsp; should be less then 2000 for fileservers&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;TABLE border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" style="width: 211px;"&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD valign="bottom" width="64"&gt;&lt;P style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;0-1000&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="bottom" width="64"&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="bottom" width="83"&gt;&lt;P style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;Good&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD valign="bottom" width="64"&gt;&lt;P style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;1000&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="bottom" width="64"&gt;&lt;P style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;2000&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="bottom" width="83"&gt;&lt;P style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;Reasonable&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD valign="bottom" width="64"&gt;&lt;P style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;2000&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="bottom" width="64"&gt;&lt;P style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;5000&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="bottom" width="83"&gt;&lt;P style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;Busy&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD valign="bottom" width="64"&gt;&lt;P style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;5000&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="bottom" width="64"&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="bottom" width="83"&gt;&lt;P style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;Bad&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;IOPS = ~150-200 IO/per disk in your AGGR if disk are FC,,,, 100-120/per disk&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 07:45:41 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>brenetapp</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-08-31T07:45:41Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>FAS 3140 performance issue?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/FAS-3140-performance-issue/m-p/67356#M15697</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have 2 nodes of FAS3140 in a cluster. Since 1 month I am facing a strange performance issue in it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. Users are reporting that tasks (either copying from filer or starting an installation) from filer are now taking 3-10 times more time to do. This was specially observed in peak hrs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. I checked with the latency of volumes and those volumes have less than 5 latency at that time.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. I also checked the bandwidth utilization of filer ports as well as at cisco switches which are available between users and filers, and they are only 20-30% utilized.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4. What will be the max latency and number of IOPS that 3140 can handle?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can someone help me in identifying the problem?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 07:09:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/FAS-3140-performance-issue/m-p/67356#M15697</guid>
      <dc:creator>sdrcpdpune</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-06-05T07:09:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FAS 3140 performance issue?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/FAS-3140-performance-issue/m-p/67361#M15699</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;latency - try this&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;from console type:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;stats show -i 10 volume:VOLume_NAME:read_latency volume:VOLUME_NAME:Write_latency&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(VOLUME NAME - just change name )&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-i 10 - time periot between test in sec.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;results:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Read_latency / Write_latency&amp;nbsp; should be less then 2000 for fileservers&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;TABLE border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" style="width: 211px;"&gt;&lt;TBODY&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD valign="bottom" width="64"&gt;&lt;P style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;0-1000&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="bottom" width="64"&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="bottom" width="83"&gt;&lt;P style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;Good&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD valign="bottom" width="64"&gt;&lt;P style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;1000&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="bottom" width="64"&gt;&lt;P style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;2000&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="bottom" width="83"&gt;&lt;P style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;Reasonable&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD valign="bottom" width="64"&gt;&lt;P style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;2000&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="bottom" width="64"&gt;&lt;P style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;5000&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="bottom" width="83"&gt;&lt;P style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;Busy&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;TR&gt;&lt;TD valign="bottom" width="64"&gt;&lt;P style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;5000&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="bottom" width="64"&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;TD valign="bottom" width="83"&gt;&lt;P style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"&gt;Bad&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/TD&gt;&lt;/TR&gt;&lt;/TBODY&gt;&lt;/TABLE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;IOPS = ~150-200 IO/per disk in your AGGR if disk are FC,,,, 100-120/per disk&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 07:45:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/FAS-3140-performance-issue/m-p/67361#M15699</guid>
      <dc:creator>brenetapp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-08-31T07:45:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FAS 3140 performance issue?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/FAS-3140-performance-issue/m-p/67366#M15701</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Output of that command is:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;gt; stats show -i 10 volume:vol3:read_latency volume:vol3:write_latency&lt;BR /&gt;Instance read_latency write_latenc&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; us&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; us&lt;BR /&gt; vol3&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 31617.50&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; vol3&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; vol3&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; vol3&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 11179.10&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; vol3&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 8183.47&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; vol3&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 16807.36&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; vol3&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 11206.60&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; vol3&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 12059.46&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; vol3&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 8381.23&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; vol3&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 4848.33&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; vol3&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 6196.23&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; vol3&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 6456.89&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; vol3&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 8402.19&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; vol3&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; vol3&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0 &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What is the solution now?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 08:52:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/FAS-3140-performance-issue/m-p/67366#M15701</guid>
      <dc:creator>sdrcpdpune</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-08-31T08:52:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FAS 3140 performance issue?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/FAS-3140-performance-issue/m-p/67371#M15703</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;How much space is left in your volume and the containing aggregate? If it's tiny (say less than 10% free space), then poor read performance may be the outcome of fragmentation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If that's the case, then the first thing to do would be to provide more 'breathing space' for your volume.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here are tons of information re fragmentation &amp;amp; reallocation:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://communities.netapp.com/thread/6530" target="_blank"&gt;http://communities.netapp.com/thread/6530&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Radek&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:51:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/FAS-3140-performance-issue/m-p/67371#M15703</guid>
      <dc:creator>radek_kubka</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-08-31T09:51:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FAS 3140 performance issue?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/FAS-3140-performance-issue/m-p/67376#M15705</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;appears to be quite busy&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;how many drives you have in aggregate? do you have any other volumes on this aggregate?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;type command: stats show -i 10 volume:vol3:read_ops volume:vol3:write_ops volume:vol3:total_ops&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;results of command divide by number of disk,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;* intable should be one zero more (1000us -- 1ms )&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:15:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/FAS-3140-performance-issue/m-p/67376#M15705</guid>
      <dc:creator>brenetapp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-08-31T12:15:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: FAS 3140 performance issue?</title>
      <link>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/FAS-3140-performance-issue/m-p/67381#M15707</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do you take a lot of snapshots on vol3?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are you using this volume as a snapmirror source?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 03:43:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.netapp.com/t5/ONTAP-Discussions/FAS-3140-performance-issue/m-p/67381#M15707</guid>
      <dc:creator>mitchells</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-09-02T03:43:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

